IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v23y2012i6p1226-1233..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Small-scale demographic structure suggests preemptive behavior in a flocking shorebird

Author

Listed:
  • Jutta Leyrer
  • Tamar Lok
  • Maarten Brugge
  • Anne Dekinga
  • Bernard Spaans
  • Jan A. van Gils
  • Brett K. Sandercock
  • Theunis Piersma

Abstract

Under the ideal-free distribution, omniscient individuals with similar habitat requirements that are free to move should be distributed such that no individual can improve fitness by changing sites; deviations would indicate trade-offs and constraints on ranging behavior. We studied site occupancy and annual survival in red knots Calidris c. canutus at their main wintering area Banc d’Arguin, Mauritania. We collected mark-resighting data at 2 high-tide roosts (A and B) that were only 3 km apart and within sight. Birds were faithful to their roosts and foraged in nearby intertidal areas, with no overlap between birds from A and B. Shellfish-rich seagrass beds were of greater abundance for birds roosting at A than at B. During 8 winters, we found different sex ratios (48% and 58% males at A and B, respectively) and different proportion of juveniles (22% and 45%) at the 2 roosts. Adult annual survival was higher at A (0.83±0.01 standard error [SE]) than at B (0.81±0.03). Though rare, between winter season movements were 3 times more frequent from B to A than vice versa, indicating that knots can assess the differences in site quality: birds behaved as if they were "ideal". As larger females and older birds occurred more at A, differences in competitive ability might maintain the site occupancy pattern. As females return from the high Arctic breeding grounds first, and adults return before juveniles, priority of occupancy may also play a role. Such an advantage of arriving earlier would represent a seasonal carryover effect.

Suggested Citation

  • Jutta Leyrer & Tamar Lok & Maarten Brugge & Anne Dekinga & Bernard Spaans & Jan A. van Gils & Brett K. Sandercock & Theunis Piersma, 2012. "Small-scale demographic structure suggests preemptive behavior in a flocking shorebird," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 23(6), pages 1226-1233.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:23:y:2012:i:6:p:1226-1233.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/ars106
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wouter K. Vahl & Jaap van der Meer & Franz J. Weissing & Diederik van Dullemen & Theunis Piersma, 2005. "The mechanisms of interference competition: two experiments on foraging waders," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 16(5), pages 845-855, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Rappoldt, Cornelis & Stillman, Richard A. & Ens, Bruno J., 2010. "A geometrical model for the effect of interference on food intake," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 221(2), pages 147-151.
    2. Allert Imre Bijleveld & Eelke Olov Folmer & Theunis Piersma, 2012. "Experimental evidence for cryptic interference among socially foraging shorebirds," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 23(4), pages 806-814.
    3. Castillo-Alvino, Hamlet Humberto & Marvá, Marcos, 2022. "Group defense promotes coexistence in interference competition: The Holling type IV competitive response," Mathematics and Computers in Simulation (MATCOM), Elsevier, vol. 198(C), pages 426-445.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:23:y:2012:i:6:p:1226-1233.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.