IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ecomod/v221y2010i2p147-151.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A geometrical model for the effect of interference on food intake

Author

Listed:
  • Rappoldt, Cornelis
  • Stillman, Richard A.
  • Ens, Bruno J.

Abstract

Interference competition is often due to kleptoparasitism (food stealing). In which case, the attack distance, the distance over which one animal attacks another in an attempt to steal food, determines to a large extent the competitor density range over which interference significantly affects the intake rate of foraging animals.

Suggested Citation

  • Rappoldt, Cornelis & Stillman, Richard A. & Ens, Bruno J., 2010. "A geometrical model for the effect of interference on food intake," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 221(2), pages 147-151.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:221:y:2010:i:2:p:147-151
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2009.10.007
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304380009006607
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2009.10.007?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wouter K. Vahl & Jaap van der Meer & Franz J. Weissing & Diederik van Dullemen & Theunis Piersma, 2005. "The mechanisms of interference competition: two experiments on foraging waders," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 16(5), pages 845-855, September.
    2. Wouter K. Vahl & Tamar Lok & Jaap van der Meer & Theunis Piersma & Franz J. Weissing, 2005. "Spatial clumping of food and social dominance affect interference competition among ruddy turnstones," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 16(5), pages 834-844, September.
    3. M. Broom & G. D. Ruxton, 2003. "Evolutionarily stable kleptoparasitism: consequences of different prey types," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 14(1), pages 23-33, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Allert Imre Bijleveld & Eelke Olov Folmer & Theunis Piersma, 2012. "Experimental evidence for cryptic interference among socially foraging shorebirds," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 23(4), pages 806-814.
    2. Castillo-Alvino, Hamlet Humberto & Marvá, Marcos, 2022. "Group defense promotes coexistence in interference competition: The Holling type IV competitive response," Mathematics and Computers in Simulation (MATCOM), Elsevier, vol. 198(C), pages 426-445.
    3. Jutta Leyrer & Tamar Lok & Maarten Brugge & Anne Dekinga & Bernard Spaans & Jan A. van Gils & Brett K. Sandercock & Theunis Piersma, 2012. "Small-scale demographic structure suggests preemptive behavior in a flocking shorebird," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 23(6), pages 1226-1233.
    4. Martin Hinsch & Ido Pen & Jan Komdeur, 2013. "Evolution of defense against depletion of local food resources in a mechanistic foraging model," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 24(1), pages 245-252.
    5. Chowdhury, Noble & Kentiba, Kirubel & Mirajkar, Yashwant & Nasseri, Mana & Rychtář, Jan & Taylor, Dewey, 2020. "Kleptoparasitic interactions modeling varying owner and intruder hunger awareness," Theoretical Population Biology, Elsevier, vol. 136(C), pages 31-40.
    6. Jo Dorning & Stephen Harris, 2017. "Dominance, gender, and season influence food patch use in a group-living, solitary foraging canid," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 28(5), pages 1302-1313.
    7. Christoforos Hadjichrysanthou & Mark Broom, 2012. "When should animals share food? Game theory applied to kleptoparasitic populations with food sharing," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 23(5), pages 977-991.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:221:y:2010:i:2:p:147-151. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/ecological-modelling .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.