IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v23y2012i5p970-976..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Influence of immediate predation risk by lions on the vigilance of prey of different body size

Author

Listed:
  • S. Périquet
  • L. Todd-Jones
  • M. Valeix
  • B. Stapelkamp
  • N. Elliot
  • M. Wijers
  • O. Pays
  • D. Fortin
  • H. Madzikanda
  • H. Fritz
  • D. W. Macdonald
  • A. J. Loveridge

Abstract

The effects on vigilance behavior of environmental cues that affect perceived risk of predation have been widely measured in gregarious herbivores. How extrinsic (e.g., predator activity within certain habitats) and intrinsic (e.g., within-group competition) cues interact depends on the biology of the prey species. However, very little is known about the impact of the actual presence of the predator in the vicinity on fine scale prey vigilance behavior. For this study, we monitored the vigilance of plains zebra (Equus quagga) and impala (Aepyceros melampus) in and around Hwange National Park, Zimbabwe. We assessed how the presence of radio-collared lions (Panthera leo) affected the vigilance of their prey. To evaluate the factors affecting vigilance behavior, we measured routine and intense vigilance. Routine vigilance can be conducted while chewing, although during intense vigilance chewing is halted and thus imposes foraging costs as food processing is delayed. As the most acute form of vigilance, we predicted that the presence of lions would lead to an increase in intense vigilance in both species. We found this to be the case for zebra, a key prey species for lions, while impala adjusted their intense vigilance to risk cues less specific to the presence of lions. Potential predation risk posed by lions in the immediate vicinity differs not only between species but also for a given species in different contexts. Our results also reveal how other environmental risk indicators influence the structure of vigilance behavior of large prey species in a manner that reflects their respective ecologies.

Suggested Citation

  • S. Périquet & L. Todd-Jones & M. Valeix & B. Stapelkamp & N. Elliot & M. Wijers & O. Pays & D. Fortin & H. Madzikanda & H. Fritz & D. W. Macdonald & A. J. Loveridge, 2012. "Influence of immediate predation risk by lions on the vigilance of prey of different body size," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 23(5), pages 970-976.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:23:y:2012:i:5:p:970-976.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/ars060
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Roper Roy E. & Goodzey C., 2004. "Ecology of Fear," Journal of Homeland Security and Emergency Management, De Gruyter, vol. 1(2), pages 1-7, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Dries P.J. Kuijper & Jakub W. Bubnicki & Marcin Churski & Bjorn Mols & Pim van Hooft, 2015. "Context dependence of risk effects: wolves and tree logs create patches of fear in an old-growth forest," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 26(6), pages 1558-1568.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Iain J. Gordon & F. Javier Pérez-Barbería & Adrian D. Manning, 2021. "Rewilding Lite: Using Traditional Domestic Livestock to Achieve Rewilding Outcomes," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-15, March.
    2. Panday, Pijush & Samanta, Sudip & Pal, Nikhil & Chattopadhyay, Joydev, 2020. "Delay induced multiple stability switch and chaos in a predator–prey model with fear effect," Mathematics and Computers in Simulation (MATCOM), Elsevier, vol. 172(C), pages 134-158.
    3. Fernando A. Campos & Linda M. Fedigan, 2014. "Spatial ecology of perceived predation risk and vigilance behavior in white-faced capuchins," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 25(3), pages 477-486.
    4. Nicolas Treich, 2022. "The Dasgupta Review and the Problem of Anthropocentrism," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 83(4), pages 973-997, December.
    5. Ghosh, Joydev & Sahoo, Banshidhar & Poria, Swarup, 2017. "Prey-predator dynamics with prey refuge providing additional food to predator," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 96(C), pages 110-119.
    6. LaRue, Michelle A. & Nielsen, Clayton K., 2016. "Population viability of recolonizing cougars in midwestern North America," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 321(C), pages 121-129.
    7. Riggs, Robert A. & Keane, Robert E. & Cimon, Norm & Cook, Rachel & Holsinger, Lisa & Cook, John & DelCurto, Timothy & Baggett, L.Scott & Justice, Donald & Powell, David & Vavra, Martin & Naylor, Bridg, 2015. "Biomass and fire dynamics in a temperate forest-grassland mosaic: Integrating multi-species herbivory, climate, and fire with the FireBGCv2/GrazeBGC system," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 296(C), pages 57-78.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:23:y:2012:i:5:p:970-976.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.