IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v23y2012i4p863-868..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Inducible defense behavior of an anuran tadpole: cue-detection range and cue types used against predator

Author

Listed:
  • Teruhiko Takahara
  • Yukihiro Kohmatsu
  • Atsushi Maruyama
  • Hideyuki Doi
  • Hiroki Yamanaka
  • Ryohei Yamaoka

Abstract

Inducible behavioral defense in response to predator cue detection is a key phenomenon in predator–prey interactions. The mechanisms by which prey use chemical/visual cues to avoid predation remain little known. We hypothesized that the distance at which prey species detect predator cues would be related to avoiding detection by the predator. To test this hypothesis, we performed laboratory experiments using an anuran tadpole (Hyla japonica) and a predatory dragonfly nymph (Anax parthenope julius). Tadpole activity level was reduced as a function of exposure to chemical cues from the dragonfly predator, but activity levels did not change when tadpoles were exposed to potential visual cues from the dragonfly. The distances over which tadpoles detected predator cues were longer than those over which the dragonfly predator detected tadpoles. The differences in cue-detection ranges between tadpoles and dragonfly predators are related both to predator avoidance by tadpoles and effective foraging strategies by dragonfly predators. Chemical cue detection as a trigger of inducible defense by prey species may shape predator–prey relationships in aquatic habitats.

Suggested Citation

  • Teruhiko Takahara & Yukihiro Kohmatsu & Atsushi Maruyama & Hideyuki Doi & Hiroki Yamanaka & Ryohei Yamaoka, 2012. "Inducible defense behavior of an anuran tadpole: cue-detection range and cue types used against predator," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 23(4), pages 863-868.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:23:y:2012:i:4:p:863-868.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/ars044
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Nick Colegrave & Graeme D. Ruxton, 2003. "Confidence intervals are a more useful complement to nonsignificant tests than are power calculations," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 14(3), pages 446-447, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Cuypers, I.R.P., 2009. "Essays on equity joint ventures, uncertainty and experience," Other publications TiSEM 8dc79e86-c625-467f-a450-8, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    2. Akin, Becci A., 2011. "Predictors of foster care exits to permanency: A competing risks analysis of reunification, guardianship, and adoption," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 33(6), pages 999-1011, June.
    3. Lisa A. Taylor & Kevin J. McGraw, 2013. "Male ornamental coloration improves courtship success in a jumping spider, but only in the sun," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 24(4), pages 955-967.
    4. Maciel, Everton A. & Martins, Valeria F. & de Paula, Mateus D. & Huth, Andreas & Guilherme, Frederico A.G. & Fischer, Rico & Giles, André & Barbosa, Reinaldo I. & Cavassan, Osmar & Martins, Fernando R, 2021. "Defaunation and changes in climate and fire frequency have synergistic effects on aboveground biomass loss in the brazilian savanna," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 454(C).
    5. Bruns, Hendrik & Kantorowicz-Reznichenko, Elena & Klement, Katharina & Luistro Jonsson, Marijane & Rahali, Bilel, 2016. "Can Nudges Be Transparent and Yet Effective?," WiSo-HH Working Paper Series 33, University of Hamburg, Faculty of Business, Economics and Social Sciences, WISO Research Laboratory.
    6. Liu, S.Y. & Walter, S. & Marden, J. & Rehkopf, D.H. & Kubzansky, L.D. & Nguyen, T. & Glymour, M.M., 2015. "Genetic vulnerability to diabetes and obesity: Does education offset the risk?," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 127(C), pages 150-158.
    7. Pavel Linhart & Hans Slabbekoorn & Roman Fuchs, 2012. "The communicative significance of song frequency and song length in territorial chiffchaffs," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 23(6), pages 1338-1347.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:23:y:2012:i:4:p:863-868.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.