IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v23y2012i2p391-396..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Brood parasites may use gape size constraints to exploit provisioning rules of smaller hosts: an experimental test of mechanisms of food allocation

Author

Listed:
  • Karen L. Wiebe
  • Tore Slagsvold

Abstract

We investigated whether a mechanism of gape size limitation could increase the competitive ability of a large brood parasite in a brood of smaller host nestlings. The gape size of hatchling birds may limit the size of prey they can swallow and hence parents should bring larger more profitable prey as their nestlings grow. The relatively large gape of a brood parasite in a brood of smaller hosts may 1) increase provisioning rate to the brood, 2) allow the parasite to swallow large prey, or 3) cause parents to start bringing larger prey at an earlier nestling stage. We added 1 large same-aged great tit Parus major nestling to broods of smaller blue tits Cyanistes caeruleus to simulate a naive brood parasite system and filmed them when 2–3 days old. The cue of a single large nestling did not cause parents to increase provisioning rates nor to change the species of prey, but prey items were larger than in control broods. Large prey were "tested" more often than small prey, that is offered and then removed from the gapes of small nestlings, and 17% of the prey that the great tit nestling received had been previously offered to a blue tit. Our results revealed that prey size brought by parents could further increase the competitive ability of brood parasites.

Suggested Citation

  • Karen L. Wiebe & Tore Slagsvold, 2012. "Brood parasites may use gape size constraints to exploit provisioning rules of smaller hosts: an experimental test of mechanisms of food allocation," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 23(2), pages 391-396.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:23:y:2012:i:2:p:391-396.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/arr202
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Márk E. Hauber & Csaba Moskát, 2008. "Shared parental care is costly for nestlings of common cuckoos and their great reed warbler hosts," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 19(1), pages 79-86.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ros Gloag & Diego T. Tuero & Vanina D. Fiorini & Juan C. Reboreda & Alex Kacelnik, 2012. "The economics of nestmate killing in avian brood parasites: a provisions trade-off," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 23(1), pages 132-140.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:23:y:2012:i:2:p:391-396.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.