IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v19y2008i1p79-86.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Shared parental care is costly for nestlings of common cuckoos and their great reed warbler hosts

Author

Listed:
  • Márk E. Hauber
  • Csaba Moskát

Abstract

Obligate avian brood parasitism typically involves one of 2 strategies: parasite chicks are either 1) virulent and evict all other eggs and nest mates to be raised alone or 2) more tolerant and share foster parental care with host chicks for some or the entirety of the nestling period. We studied the consequences of experimentally forced mixed broods of age-matched one common cuckoo (Cuculus canorus) and 2 great reed warbler (Acrocephalus arundinaceus) chicks. In these broods, both cuckoo and host chicks grew slower than did either individual cuckoos or great reed warblers in broods of 1 parasite or 3 host chicks, respectively. Video records showed that in mixed broods, cuckoo chicks received feedings less frequently than the 33% predicted by chance at 4 days of age but parental food allocations increased to chance levels at 8 days of age. The consistent patterns of lower growth rates arose even though chicks in broods of 1 parasite and 2 hosts received the largest prey items per feeding. In addition, several other measures of parental provisioning also did not predict species and brood-specific differences in nestling growth rates across the different treatments. However, variation in begging displays and its specific costs on host and parasite chicks in the different nest treatments were not quantified in this study. We conclude that young of nest mate--evictor common cuckoos benefit from the sole occupancy of host nests in part owing to an initial competitive disadvantage for parental care in broods with age-matched great reed warbler chicks. Copyright 2008, Oxford University Press.

Suggested Citation

  • Márk E. Hauber & Csaba Moskát, 2008. "Shared parental care is costly for nestlings of common cuckoos and their great reed warbler hosts," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 19(1), pages 79-86.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:19:y:2008:i:1:p:79-86
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/arm108
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ros Gloag & Diego T. Tuero & Vanina D. Fiorini & Juan C. Reboreda & Alex Kacelnik, 2012. "The economics of nestmate killing in avian brood parasites: a provisions trade-off," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 23(1), pages 132-140.
    2. Karen L. Wiebe & Tore Slagsvold, 2012. "Brood parasites may use gape size constraints to exploit provisioning rules of smaller hosts: an experimental test of mechanisms of food allocation," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 23(2), pages 391-396.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:19:y:2008:i:1:p:79-86. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.