IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v23y2012i1p201-209..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparative effects of urban development and anthropogenic noise on bird songs

Author

Listed:
  • J.L. Dowling
  • D.A. Luther
  • P.P. Marra

Abstract

Many avian species live, breed, and communicate in urban areas. To survive and reproduce in these areas, birds must transmit their signals to intended receivers. As an arena for acoustic communication, 2 salient features of the urban environment are an abundance of reflective surfaces and a high level of low-frequency anthropogenic noise. Each presents unique communication challenges, with hard surfaces reflecting and distorting high frequencies and noise masking low-frequency song components. Based on this, we predicted that noise level would affect minimum song frequency and urban development (percentage of impervious surface) would affect maximum frequency and frequency range. We compared the effects of urban development and noise on songs of 6 bird species at 28 sites along an urban to rural gradient, across a broad range of noise levels. We found that minimum song frequency increased as noise level increased for 2 of 6 species, with 5 of 6 species showing a strong trend in the predicted direction. Species with lower frequency songs were more affected by noise. Maximum frequency and frequency range decreased for 2 of 6 species as urban development increased, and this effect was stronger for species with higher frequency songs. For some species, minimum frequency only increased with noise at less urban sites and similarly, maximum frequency and frequency range only decreased with urbanization at quiet sites, suggesting a trade-off between different vocal adjustments. Ours is the first study to investigate how noise and urban development affect song frequency characteristics of multiple bird species.

Suggested Citation

  • J.L. Dowling & D.A. Luther & P.P. Marra, 2012. "Comparative effects of urban development and anthropogenic noise on bird songs," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 23(1), pages 201-209.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:23:y:2012:i:1:p:201-209.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/arr176
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Yoav Benjamini & Yosef Hochberg, 2000. "On the Adaptive Control of the False Discovery Rate in Multiple Testing With Independent Statistics," Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, , vol. 25(1), pages 60-83, March.
    2. Yang Hu & Gonçalo C. Cardoso, 2009. "Are bird species that vocalize at higher frequencies preadapted to inhabit noisy urban areas?," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 20(6), pages 1268-1273.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Shigeyuki Matsui & Hisashi Noma, 2011. "Estimating Effect Sizes of Differentially Expressed Genes for Power and Sample-Size Assessments in Microarray Experiments," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 67(4), pages 1225-1235, December.
    2. Ferreira José A. & Berkhof Johannes & Souverein Olga & Zwinderman Koos, 2009. "A Multiple Testing Approach to High-Dimensional Association Studies with an Application to the Detection of Associations between Risk Factors of Heart Disease and Genetic Polymorphisms," Statistical Applications in Genetics and Molecular Biology, De Gruyter, vol. 8(1), pages 1-58, January.
    3. Long Qu & Dan Nettleton & Jack C. M. Dekkers, 2012. "Improved Estimation of the Noncentrality Parameter Distribution from a Large Number of t-Statistics, with Applications to False Discovery Rate Estimation in Microarray Data Analysis," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 68(4), pages 1178-1187, December.
    4. Guo Wenge & Peddada Shyamal, 2008. "Adaptive Choice of the Number of Bootstrap Samples in Large Scale Multiple Testing," Statistical Applications in Genetics and Molecular Biology, De Gruyter, vol. 7(1), pages 1-21, March.
    5. Shigeyuki Matsui & Shu Zeng & Takeharu Yamanaka & John Shaughnessy, 2008. "Sample Size Calculations Based on Ranking and Selection in Microarray Experiments," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 64(1), pages 217-226, March.
    6. Juan David Carvajal-Castro & Ana María Ospina-L & Yemay Toro-López & Anny Pulido-G & Laura Ximena Cabrera-Casas & Sebastián Guerrero-Peláez & Víctor Hugo García-Merchán & Fernando Vargas-Salinas, 2019. "Birds vs bricks: Patterns of species diversity in response to urbanization in a Neotropical Andean city," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(6), pages 1-20, June.
    7. Yu, Chang & Zelterman, Daniel, 2017. "A parametric model to estimate the proportion from true null using a distribution for p-values," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 105-118.
    8. Yoav Benjamini, 2010. "Discovering the false discovery rate," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 72(4), pages 405-416, September.
    9. Hai Shu & Bin Nan & Robert Koeppe, 2015. "Multiple testing for neuroimaging via hidden Markov random field," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 71(3), pages 741-750, September.
    10. Döhler, Sebastian, 2018. "A discrete modification of the Benjamini–Yekutieli procedure," Econometrics and Statistics, Elsevier, vol. 5(C), pages 137-147.
    11. Wenguang Sun & T. Tony Cai, 2009. "Large‐scale multiple testing under dependence," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 71(2), pages 393-424, April.
    12. Mithat Gönen & Peter H. Westfall & Wesley O. Johnson, 2003. "Bayesian Multiple Testing for Two-Sample Multivariate Endpoints," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 59(1), pages 76-82, March.
    13. Danya Lagos, 2018. "Looking at Population Health Beyond “Male” and “Female”: Implications of Transgender Identity and Gender Nonconformity for Population Health," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 55(6), pages 2097-2117, December.
    14. David Ruppert & Dan Nettleton & J. T. Gene Hwang, 2007. "Exploring the Information in p-Values for the Analysis and Planning of Multiple-Test Experiments," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 63(2), pages 483-495, June.
    15. Alessio Farcomeni, 2009. "Generalized Augmentation to Control the False Discovery Exceedance in Multiple Testing," Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, Danish Society for Theoretical Statistics;Finnish Statistical Society;Norwegian Statistical Association;Swedish Statistical Association, vol. 36(3), pages 501-517, September.
    16. Kong Xin-Bing & Xu Qin-Feng, 2015. "On False Discovery and Non-discovery Proportions of the Dynamic Adaptive Procedure," Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, Danish Society for Theoretical Statistics;Finnish Statistical Society;Norwegian Statistical Association;Swedish Statistical Association, vol. 42(2), pages 530-544, June.
    17. Marina Bogomolov & Ruth Heller, 2018. "Assessing replicability of findings across two studies of multiple features," Biometrika, Biometrika Trust, vol. 105(3), pages 505-516.
    18. Gonçalo C. Cardoso, 2012. "Paradoxical calls: the opposite signaling role of sound frequency across bird species," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 23(2), pages 237-241.
    19. Wenge Guo & Sanat K. Sarkar & Shyamal D. Peddada, 2010. "Controlling False Discoveries in Multidimensional Directional Decisions, with Applications to Gene Expression Data on Ordered Categories," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 66(2), pages 485-492, June.
    20. Mitter, Hermine & Schmid, Erwin, 2019. "Computing the economic value of climate information for water stress management exemplified by crop production in Austria," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 221(C), pages 430-448.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:23:y:2012:i:1:p:201-209.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.