IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v22y2011i4p831-836.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Prey jitters; protean behaviour in grouped prey

Author

Listed:
  • Katherine A. Jones
  • Andrew L. Jackson
  • Graeme D. Ruxton

Abstract

There have been many descriptive accounts of so-called "protean" or unpredictable escape tactics in prey animals. It is assumed that predators will have difficulty targeting more protean prey either via the prey's escape trajectory and/or via enhancement of the confusion effect (reduced ability to track an individual target in a group of moving and phenotypically similar prey). However, to date no studies have examined whether protean movements decrease predation risk as predicted. In this paper we test, using humans as model predators, whether "protean" prey that have a higher variance in turning angle (and thus change direction abruptly, rather than move on a smoother trajectory) are more difficult to capture and whether this interacts with the confusion effect (previously found using the same model system). We found that protean prey were significantly more difficult to capture. However, protean behaviour did not enhance the confusion effect. We suggest that the primary purpose of protean movements may simply be to make it more difficult for a predator to chase and capture prey, increasing the likelihood predators will give up chase sooner, and that such protean behaviour need not be contingent on prey aggregation. Copyright 2011, Oxford University Press.

Suggested Citation

  • Katherine A. Jones & Andrew L. Jackson & Graeme D. Ruxton, 2011. "Prey jitters; protean behaviour in grouped prey," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 22(4), pages 831-836.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:22:y:2011:i:4:p:831-836
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/arr062
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Frédéric B. Muratori & Angéla Rouyar & Thierry Hance, 2014. "Clonal variation in aggregation and defensive behavior in pea aphids," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 25(4), pages 901-908.
    2. Gabe Winter & Luis Wirsching & Holger Schielzeth, 2023. "Condition dependence of (un)predictability in escape behavior of a grasshopper species," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 34(5), pages 741-750.
    3. Caroline H. Brighton & Laura N. Kloepper & Christian D. Harding & Lucy Larkman & Kathryn McGowan & Lillias Zusi & Graham K. Taylor, 2022. "Raptors avoid the confusion effect by targeting fixed points in dense aerial prey aggregations," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-13, December.
    4. Callum Duffield & Christos C Ioannou, 2017. "Marginal predation: do encounter or confusion effects explain the targeting of prey group edges?," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 28(5), pages 1283-1292.
    5. Jack A Brand & Jason Henry & Gabriela C Melo & Donald Wlodkowic & Bob B M Wong & Jake M Martin, 2023. "Sex differences in the predictability of risk-taking behavior," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 34(1), pages 108-116.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:22:y:2011:i:4:p:831-836. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.