IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v21y2010i3p570-575.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Learning by proportional observation in a species of fish

Author

Listed:
  • Thomas W. Pike
  • Jeremy R. Kendal
  • Luke E. Rendell
  • Kevin N. Laland

Abstract

Theoretical analyses predict that animals should not copy other individuals indiscriminately but rather should do so selectively, according to evolved behavioral strategies that dictate the circumstances under which they copy. Here, we show experimentally that nine-spined sticklebacks (Pungitius pungitius) use social information in accordance with 1 of 3 theoretically predicted optimal strategies to guide their foraging behavior. Under test, sticklebacks copied the foraging patch choice of demonstrator individuals with a probability proportional to the demonstrators' payoff. The observation of this highly efficient form of learning in a species of fish supports the view that the presence of enhanced social learning may be better predicted by specific sources of selection than by how closely the species is related to humans and sheds light on the character of an adaptive specialization in stickleback learning. Copyright 2010, Oxford University Press.

Suggested Citation

  • Thomas W. Pike & Jeremy R. Kendal & Luke E. Rendell & Kevin N. Laland, 2010. "Learning by proportional observation in a species of fish," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 21(3), pages 570-575.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:21:y:2010:i:3:p:570-575
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/arq025
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Choudhury, Kangkan Dev & Aydinyan, Tigran, 2023. "Stochastic replicator dynamics: A theoretical analysis and an experimental assessment," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 851-865.
    2. Dominique Guillo & Nicolas Claidière, 2020. "Do guide dogs have culture? The case of indirect social learning," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 7(1), pages 1-9, December.
    3. Karl H. Schlag, 2022. "Social Learning between Groups: Imitation and the Role of Experience," Games, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-14, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:21:y:2010:i:3:p:570-575. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.