IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v20y2009i3p560-569.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

What decision rules might pink-footed geese use to depart on migration? An individual-based model

Author

Listed:
  • Olivier Duriez
  • Silke Bauer
  • Anne Destin
  • Jesper Madsen
  • Bart A. Nolet
  • Richard A. Stillman
  • Marcel Klaassen

Abstract

Decisions taken during migration can have a large effect on the fitness of birds. Migration must be accurately timed with food availability to allow efficient fueling but is also constrained by the optimal arrival date at the breeding site. The decision of when to leave a site can be driven by energetics (sufficient body stores to fuel flight), time-related cues (internal clock under photoperiodic control), or external cues (temperature, food resources). An individual based model (IBM) that allows a mechanistic description of a range of departure decision rules was applied to the spring migration of pink-footed geese (Anser brachyrhynchus) from wintering grounds in Denmark to breeding grounds on Svalbard via 2 Norwegian staging sites. By comparing predicted with observed departure dates, we tested 7 decision rules. The most accurate predictions were obtained from a decision rule based on a combination of cues including the amount of body stores, date, and plant phenology. Decision rules changed over the course of migration with the external cue decreasing in importance and the time-related cue increasing in importance for sites closer to breeding grounds. These results are in accordance with descriptions of goose migration, following the "green-wave": Geese track the onset of plant growth as it moves northward in spring, with an uncoupling toward the end of the migration if time is running out. We demonstrate the potential of IBMs to study the possible mechanisms underlying stopover ecology in migratory birds and to serve as tools to predict consequences of environmental change. Copyright 2009, Oxford University Press.

Suggested Citation

  • Olivier Duriez & Silke Bauer & Anne Destin & Jesper Madsen & Bart A. Nolet & Richard A. Stillman & Marcel Klaassen, 2009. "What decision rules might pink-footed geese use to depart on migration? An individual-based model," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 20(3), pages 560-569.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:20:y:2009:i:3:p:560-569
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/arp032
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Baveco, Johannes M. & Kuipers, Harold & Nolet, Bart A., 2011. "A large-scale multi-species spatial depletion model for overwintering waterfowl," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 222(20), pages 3773-3784.
    2. Dodson, Stephanie & Abrahms, Briana & Bograd, Steven J. & Fiechter, Jerome & Hazen, Elliott L., 2020. "Disentangling the biotic and abiotic drivers of emergent migratory behavior using individual-based models," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 432(C).
    3. Malishev, Matthew & Kramer-Schadt, Stephanie, 2021. "Movement, models, and metabolism: Individual-based energy budget models as next-generation extensions for predicting animal movement outcomes across scales," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 441(C).
    4. Chudzińska, Magda & Ayllón, Daniel & Madsen, Jesper & Nabe-Nielsen, Jacob, 2016. "Discriminating between possible foraging decisions using pattern-oriented modelling: The case of pink-footed geese in Mid-Norway during their spring migration," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 320(C), pages 299-315.
    5. McLane, Adam J. & Semeniuk, Christina & McDermid, Gregory J. & Marceau, Danielle J., 2011. "The role of agent-based models in wildlife ecology and management," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 222(8), pages 1544-1556.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:20:y:2009:i:3:p:560-569. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.