IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v19y2008i2p245-254.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

What best explains vigilance in elk: characteristics of prey, predators, or the environment?

Author

Listed:
  • Stewart Liley
  • Scott Creel

Abstract

We quantified the vigilance levels of elk (Cervus elaphus) preyed on by wolves (Canis lupus) in Yellowstone National Park, between January and May in 2005 and 2006, and used Akaike's information criterion to compare a set of 38 regression models for vigilance levels. These models combined up to 9 predictor variables of 3 types: characteristics of the prey group (herd size and composition), characteristics of the predator (wolf pack size, distance away, and the presence/absence of a kill), and characteristics of the local environment (distance to woodland edges, snow depth, and snow cover). The set of models spanned a range of complexity from simple univariate models to complex combinations with up to 3 variables of each type. Complex models incorporating the characteristics of the wolf pack, the structure of the elk herd, and the environmental conditions had higher information content than simple models. Although univariate models of vigilance detect significant relationships, they have low information content relative to multivariate models. These results show that elk assesses factors of several types when assessing risk and deciding how much time to allocate to vigilance. In particular, we found that all well-supported models of vigilance included several "prey" variables and several "predator" variables. This result highlights the need to consider information about predators when trying to explain variation in vigilance levels in prey. Copyright 2008, Oxford University Press.

Suggested Citation

  • Stewart Liley & Scott Creel, 2008. "What best explains vigilance in elk: characteristics of prey, predators, or the environment?," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 19(2), pages 245-254.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:19:y:2008:i:2:p:245-254
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/arm116
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Dries P.J. Kuijper & Jakub W. Bubnicki & Marcin Churski & Bjorn Mols & Pim van Hooft, 2015. "Context dependence of risk effects: wolves and tree logs create patches of fear in an old-growth forest," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 26(6), pages 1558-1568.
    2. Darcy R Visscher & Evelyn H Merrill, 2018. "Functional connectivity in ruminants: A generalized state-dependent modelling approach," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(6), pages 1-22, June.
    3. Adam Zbyryt & Jakub W Bubnicki & Dries P J Kuijper & Martin Dehnhard & Marcin Churski & Krzysztof Schmidt & Bob WongHandling editor, 2018. "Do wild ungulates experience higher stress with humans than with large carnivores?," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 29(1), pages 19-30.
    4. Federico Tettamanti & Vincent A Viblanc, 2014. "Influences of Mating Group Composition on the Behavioral Time-Budget of Male and Female Alpine Ibex (Capra ibex) during the Rut," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(1), pages 1-14, January.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:19:y:2008:i:2:p:245-254. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.