IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v18y2007i1p41-46.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Aposematic coloration, luminance contrast, and the benefits of conspicuousness

Author

Listed:
  • Kathleen L. Prudic
  • Ana K. Skemp
  • Daniel R. Papaj

Abstract

Many organisms use warning, or aposematic, coloration to signal their unprofitability to potential predators. Aposematically colored prey are highly visually conspicuous. There is considerable empirical support that conspicuousness promotes the effectiveness of the aposematic signal. From these experiments, it is well documented that conspicuous, unprofitable prey are detected sooner and aversion learned faster by the predator as compared with cryptic, unprofitable prey. Predators also retain memory of the aversion longer when prey is conspicuous. The present study focused on the elements of conspicuousness that confer these benefits of aposematic coloration. Drawing on current understanding of animal vision, we distinguish 2 features of warning coloration: high chromatic contrast and high brightness, or luminance, contrast. Previous investigations on aposematic signal efficacy have focused mainly on the role of high chromatic contrast between prey and background, whereas little research has investigated the role of high luminance contrast. Using the Chinese mantid as a model predator and gray-painted milkweed bugs as model prey, we found that increased prey luminance contrast increased detection of prey, facilitated predator aversion learning, and increased predator memory retention of the aversive response. Our results suggest that the luminance contrast component of aposematic coloration can be an effective warning signal between the prey and predator. Thus, warning coloration can even evolve as an effective signal to color blind predators. Copyright 2007.

Suggested Citation

  • Kathleen L. Prudic & Ana K. Skemp & Daniel R. Papaj, 2007. "Aposematic coloration, luminance contrast, and the benefits of conspicuousness," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 18(1), pages 41-46, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:18:y:2007:i:1:p:41-46
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/arl046
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Marie-Christin Hardenbicker & Cynthia Tedore, 2023. "Peacock spiders prefer image statistics of average natural scenes over those of male ornamentation," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 34(5), pages 719-728.
    2. Amanda M Franklin & Matthew B Applegate & Sara M Lewis & Fiorenzo G Omenetto, 2017. "Stomatopods detect and assess achromatic cues in contests," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 28(5), pages 1329-1336.
    3. Ossi Nokelainen & Sanni A. Silvasti & Sharon Y. Strauss & Niklas Wahlberg & Johanna Mappes, 2024. "Predator selection on phenotypic variability of cryptic and aposematic moths," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-12, December.
    4. Maria E McNamara & Derek E G Briggs & Patrick J Orr & Sonja Wedmann & Heeso Noh & Hui Cao, 2011. "Fossilized Biophotonic Nanostructures Reveal the Original Colors of 47-Million-Year-Old Moths," PLOS Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(11), pages 1-8, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:18:y:2007:i:1:p:41-46. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.