IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/apecpp/v34y2012i4p615-636..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Analyzing Farmer Participation Intentions and County Enrollment Rates for the Average Crop Revenue Election Program

Author

Listed:
  • Paul D. Mitchell
  • Roderick M. Rejesus
  • Keith H. Coble
  • Thomas O. Knight

Abstract

The 2008 Farm Bill created the Average Crop Revenue Election (ACRE) program to be a new commodity support program. Using a multinomial logit model to analyze a mail survey administered before the ACRE sign-up deadline, we identify factors driving farmer intentions regarding ACRE participation. Using a Tobit model to analyze actual county-level ACRE enrollment rates, we assess the effect of similar factors on actual farmer decisions. Results suggest that primary crops, risk perceptions, risk aversion, and program complexity were important factors affecting participation. Farmer beliefs and attitudes also played key roles, and were changing during the months before the ACRE deadline.

Suggested Citation

  • Paul D. Mitchell & Roderick M. Rejesus & Keith H. Coble & Thomas O. Knight, 2012. "Analyzing Farmer Participation Intentions and County Enrollment Rates for the Average Crop Revenue Election Program," Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 34(4), pages 615-636.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:apecpp:v:34:y:2012:i:4:p:615-636.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/aepp/pps038
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version below or search for a different version of it.

    Other versions of this item:

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Coble, Keith H. & Barnett, Barry J. & Riley, John Michael, 2013. "Challenging Belief in the Law of Small Numbers," 2013 AAEA: Crop Insurance and the Farm Bill Symposium 156958, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    2. Bigelow, Daniel & Borchers, Allison, 2017. "Major Uses of Land in the United States, 2012," Economic Information Bulletin 263079, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    3. Taylor, Mykel R. & Tonsor, Glynn T. & Wilson, Candice, 2017. "Factors Affecting 2014 Farm Bill Commodity Program Enrollment for Kansas Farmers," 2017 Annual Meeting, July 30-August 1, Chicago, Illinois 258190, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    4. Taylor, Mykel & Wilson, Candice, 2017. "Effects of Imperfect Information on 2014 Farm Bill Program Enrollment," 2017 Annual Meeting, February 4-7, 2017, Mobile, Alabama 252805, Southern Agricultural Economics Association.
    5. Lee, Yu Na & Chau, Nancy & Just, David R., 2019. "Producer group participation in the trade adjustment assistance program for farmers before and after the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 1-1.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:apecpp:v:34:y:2012:i:4:p:615-636.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aaeaaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.