IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/ajagec/v97y2015i3p998-1019..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Inefficiency of Male and Female Labor Supply in Agricultural Households: Evidence from Uganda

Author

Listed:
  • Martyn J. Andrews
  • Jennifer Golan
  • Jann Lay

Abstract

This article analyzes the efficiency of the intra-household allocation of female and male labor inputs in agricultural production. In a collective household model, spouses' optimal on-farm labor supply is such that the marginal rate of technical substitution between male and female labor is equated over different crops. Using the Uganda National Household Survey 2005/06, we test whether this condition holds by estimating production functions and controlling for endogeneity using a method proposed by Gandhi, Navarro, and Rivers (2009). We find that women are less productive than men, that there is more female labor input on low productivity parcels, and that men are relatively more productive on female-controlled plots compared with male-controlled plots. Total farm output could be higher and Pareto improvements could be possible if male labor was reallocated to female-controlled plots and/or female labor was reallocated to male-controlled plots.

Suggested Citation

  • Martyn J. Andrews & Jennifer Golan & Jann Lay, 2015. "Inefficiency of Male and Female Labor Supply in Agricultural Households: Evidence from Uganda," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 97(3), pages 998-1019.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:ajagec:v:97:y:2015:i:3:p:998-1019.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/ajae/aau091
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. repec:ags:aaea22:335811 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Schwab, Benjamin & Hodjo, Manzamasso, 2018. "Who has the time? Gender, Labor and Willingness to Pay for Mechanized technology in Bangladesh and Ethiopia," 2018 Annual Meeting, August 5-7, Washington, D.C. 274258, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    3. Marie Christine Apedo-Amah & Habiba Djebbari & Roberta Ziparo, 2019. "Gender, information and the efficiency of household production decisions: An experiment in rural Togo," Working Papers halshs-02462673, HAL.
    4. Peter Agamile & Ralitza Dimova & Jennifer Golan, 2021. "Crop Choice, Drought and Gender: New Insights from Smallholders’ Response to Weather Shocks in Rural Uganda," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 72(3), pages 829-856, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:ajagec:v:97:y:2015:i:3:p:998-1019.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aaeaaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.