IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/ajagec/v83y2001i5p1293-1301.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Dynamics of Child Care Subsidy use by Rural Families in Oregon

Author

Listed:
  • Elizabeth E. Davis
  • Roberta B. Weber

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Elizabeth E. Davis & Roberta B. Weber, 2001. "The Dynamics of Child Care Subsidy use by Rural Families in Oregon," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 83(5), pages 1293-1301.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:ajagec:v:83:y:2001:i:5:p:1293-1301
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1111/0002-9092.00281
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Bruce Weber & Leif Jensen & Kathleen Miller & Jane Mosley & Monica Fisher, 2005. "A Critical Review of Rural Poverty Literature: Is There Truly a Rural Effect?," International Regional Science Review, , vol. 28(4), pages 381-414, October.
    2. Allison De Marco & Lynne Vernon-Feagans, 2015. "Child Care Subsidy Use and Child Care Quality in Low-Wealth, Rural Communities," Journal of Family and Economic Issues, Springer, vol. 36(3), pages 383-395, September.
    3. Jurga Bucaite-Vilke, 2021. "Family Choices on Welfare and Territorial Disadvantages: The Perception of the Child Care Services Approach in Urban and Rural Areas," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(3), pages 21582440211, July.
    4. Weber, Roberta B. & Grobe, Deana & Scott, Ellen K., 2018. "Predictors of low-income parent child care selections," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 528-540.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:ajagec:v:83:y:2001:i:5:p:1293-1301. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aaeaaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.