IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/ajagec/v71y1989i2p326-337..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Four Approaches to Commodity Market Stabilization: A Comparative Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Joseph Glauber
  • Peter Helmberger
  • Mario Miranda

Abstract

The effects of four alternative price stabilization programs for soybeans are compared using a rational expectations model and simulation. For a given government expenditure, subsidized private storage is the most efficient way to stabilize market price. For a given deadweight loss, a program of direct payments is the most efficient stabilizer of the effective farm price; this program does not stabilize market price. All four programs, including a buffer stock program and one involving both direct payments and buffer stocks, tend to destabilize quasi-rent. Programs that involve an initial build-up of stocks increase producer benefits and hurt consumers.

Suggested Citation

  • Joseph Glauber & Peter Helmberger & Mario Miranda, 1989. "Four Approaches to Commodity Market Stabilization: A Comparative Analysis," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 71(2), pages 326-337.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:ajagec:v:71:y:1989:i:2:p:326-337.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.2307/1241590
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Christophe Gouel, 2012. "Agricultural Price Instability: A Survey Of Competing Explanations And Remedies," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 26(1), pages 129-156, February.
    2. Holt, Matthew T., 1989. "Risk, Rational Expectations, and Price Stabilization in the U.S. Corn Market," Staff Papers 200480, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Department of Agricultural and Applied Economics.
    3. Gouel, Christophe, 2013. "Optimal food price stabilisation policy," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 118-134.
    4. Femenia, Fabienne, 2012. "Should private storage be subsidized to stabilize agricultural markets once price support schemes are removed? A General Equilibrium analysis applied to European reforms," Conference papers 330253, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
    5. Femenia, Fabienne, 2011. "To Subsidize or Not to Subsidize Private Storage? Evaluation of the Effects of Private Storage Subsidies as an Instrument to Stabilize Agricultural Markets After CAP Reforms," 2011 International Congress, August 30-September 2, 2011, Zurich, Switzerland 114360, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    6. Féménia, Fabienne & Gohin, Alexandre, 2010. "Faut-il une intervention publique pour stabiliser les marchés agricoles ? Revue des questions non résolues," Review of Agricultural and Environmental Studies - Revue d'Etudes en Agriculture et Environnement (RAEStud), Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (INRA), vol. 91(4).
    7. Goetz, Stephan J., 1993. "On the Existence of Stable Equilibria in Agriculture," Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 25(1), pages 208-216, July.
    8. Krause, Joyce Hall & Brorsen, B. Wade, 1995. "Outcomes of government corn support policies under alternate assumptions of risk," Journal of Policy Modeling, Elsevier, vol. 17(3), pages 279-291, June.
    9. Kennedy P. Lynn & Schmitz Andrew & van Kooten G. Cornelis, 2020. "The Role of Storage and Trade in Food Security," Journal of Agricultural & Food Industrial Organization, De Gruyter, vol. 18(1), pages 1-13, January.
    10. Femenia, Fabienne, 2012. "Should private storage be subsidized to stabilize agricultural markets after price support schemes are removed?:," IFPRI discussion papers 1205, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:ajagec:v:71:y:1989:i:2:p:326-337.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aaeaaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.