IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/ajagec/v69y1987i5p1101-1105..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Risk Attitudes Measured by the Interval Approach: A Case Study of Kansas Farmers

Author

Listed:
  • Arthur C. Thomas

Abstract

Risk attitudes of farmers are of major importance to agricultural economists. This study utilizes a questionnaire designed to determine risk aversion levels. Risk aversion intervals are elicited using generalized stochastic dominance for thirty northeastern Kansas farmers in order to investigate the relationship between age and level of risk aversion, the consistency of risk aversion over five income ranges, and the accuracy of farmers self-assessments of risk aversion. Results indicate no statistically significant difference between the risk aversion levels of younger and older farmers. The majority of farmers expressed fairly consistent risk attitudes over different income ranges. Finally, farmers show some ability to assess their own risk attitudes.

Suggested Citation

  • Arthur C. Thomas, 1987. "Risk Attitudes Measured by the Interval Approach: A Case Study of Kansas Farmers," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 69(5), pages 1101-1105.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:ajagec:v:69:y:1987:i:5:p:1101-1105.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.2307/1242266
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Fausti, Scott W. & Gillespie, Jeffrey M., 2006. "Measuring risk attitude of agricultural producers using a mail survey: how consistent are the methods?," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 50(2), pages 1-18, June.
    2. Angelos Liontakis & Irene Tzouramani, 2016. "Economic Sustainability of Organic Aloe Vera Farming in Greece under Risk and Uncertainty," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(4), pages 1-13, April.
    3. Williams, J. R. & DeLano, D. R. & Heiniger, R. W. & Vanderlip, R. L. & Llewelyn, R. V., 1999. "Replanting strategies for grain sorghum under risk," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 60(2), pages 137-155, May.
    4. Toland, Gerald D. Jr. & Schmiesing, Brain H. & Black, J. Roy, 1990. "A Comparison of Crop Yield Coverage Plans for Multiple Peril Crop Insurance," 1990 Annual meeting, August 5-8, Vancouver, Canada 271049, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    5. Schurle, Bryan W. & Tierney, William I., Jr., 1990. "A Comparison of Risk Preference Measurements with Implications for Extension Programming," Staff Papers 118185, Kansas State University, Department of Agricultural Economics.
    6. Lombard, J. P. & Kassier, W. E., 1990. "Implementering Van Die Intervalbenadering By Die Bepaling Van Besluitnemers Se Houding Teenoor Risiko," Agrekon, Agricultural Economics Association of South Africa (AEASA), vol. 29(4), December.
    7. Ahearn, Mary Clare & Collender, Robert N. & Diao, Xinshen & Harrington, David H. & Hoppe, Robert A. & Korb, Penelope J. & Makki, Shiva S. & Morehart, Mitchell J. & Roberts, Michael J. & Roe, Terry L. , 2004. "Decoupled Payments In A Changing Policy Setting," Agricultural Economic Reports 33981, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    8. Eihab M. Fathelrahman & James C. Ascough II & Dana L. Hoag & Robert W. Malone & Philip Heilman & Lori J. Wiles & Ramesh S. Kanwar, 2011. "Continuum of Risk Analysis Methods to Assess Tillage System Sustainability at the Experimental Plot Level," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 3(7), pages 1-29, July.
    9. Stockil, R.C. & Ortmann, Gerald F., 1997. "Perceptions Of Risk Among Commercial Farmers In Kwazulu-Natal In A Changing Economic Environment," Agrekon, Agricultural Economics Association of South Africa (AEASA), vol. 36(2), pages 1-21, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:ajagec:v:69:y:1987:i:5:p:1101-1105.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aaeaaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.