IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/ajagec/v65y1983i4p694-702..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Soil Conservation with Uncertain Revenues and Input Supplies

Author

Listed:
  • Randall A. Kramer
  • William T. McSweeny
  • Robert W. Stavros

Abstract

The influence of risk on farm level soil conservation decisions is examined. A symmetric quadratic risk-programming model is used which allows the simultaneous consideration of uncertainty in revenues and input supplies. It is demonstrated that risk aversion can influence the selection of soil-conserving activities.

Suggested Citation

  • Randall A. Kramer & William T. McSweeny & Robert W. Stavros, 1983. "Soil Conservation with Uncertain Revenues and Input Supplies," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 65(4), pages 694-702.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:ajagec:v:65:y:1983:i:4:p:694-702.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.2307/1240457
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Shively, Gerald E., 2001. "Poverty, consumption risk, and soil conservation," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 65(2), pages 267-290, August.
    2. Shortle, James S., 1984. "The Use Of Estimated Pollution Flows In Agricultural Pollution Control Policy: Implications For Abatement And Policy Instruments," Northeastern Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Northeastern Agricultural and Resource Economics Association, vol. 13(2), pages 1-9, October.
    3. Yang, Wanhong & Khanna, Madhu & Farnsworth, Richard & Onal, Hayri, 2003. "Integrating economic, environmental and GIS modeling to target cost effective land retirement in multiple watersheds," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 46(2), pages 249-267, September.
    4. Letson, David & Setia, Parveen P., 1994. "On-Farm Costos of Reducing environmental degradation under risk," Estudios Económicos, El Colegio de México, Centro de Estudios Económicos, vol. 9(2), pages 163-187.
    5. Sureshwaran, Suresh & Thompson, C. Stassen & Henry, Mark S. & Loyd, M.I., 1990. "Economic Surplus And The Distributional Consequences Of Deregulating Tobacco Production," Southern Journal of Agricultural Economics, Southern Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 22(2), pages 1-11, December.
    6. Nielsen, Elizabeth G. & Miranowski, John A. & Morehart, Mitchell J, 1989. "Investments in Soil Conservation and Land Improvements: Factors Explaining Farmers' Decisions," Agricultural Economic Reports 308064, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    7. McCarl, Bruce A., 1986. "Innovations In Programming Techniques For Risk Analysis," Regional Research Projects > 1986: S-180 Annual Meeting, March 23-26, 1986, Tampa, Florida 271825, Regional Research Projects > S-180: An Economic Analysis of Risk Management Strategies for Agricultural Production Firms.
    8. Setia, Parveen & Letson, Dave, 1991. "Farm Level Impacts Of Improving Environmental Quality Under Risk," 1991 Annual Meeting, August 4-7, Manhattan, Kansas 271085, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    9. Gillespie, Jeffrey M. & Hatch, L. Upton & Duffy, Patricia A., 1990. "Effect Of The 1985 Farm Bill Provisions On Farmers' Soil Conservation Decisions," Southern Journal of Agricultural Economics, Southern Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 22(2), pages 1-11, December.
    10. Diebel, Penelope L. & Taylor, Daniel B. & Batie, Sandra S. & Heatwole, Conrad D., 1992. "An Economic Analysis of Soil Erosion Control and Low-Input Agriculture," Staff Papers 118171, Kansas State University, Department of Agricultural Economics.
    11. Martins, M.B. & Marques, C., 2006. "Is agricultural policy promoting a new role for farmers?: A case study," Journal of Policy Modeling, Elsevier, vol. 28(8), pages 847-860, November.
    12. Segarra, Eduardo & Kramer, Randall A. & Taylor, Daniel B., 1985. "A Stochastic Programming Analysis Of The Farm Level Implications Of Soil Erosion Control," Southern Journal of Agricultural Economics, Southern Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 17(2), pages 1-8, December.
    13. Willis, David B. & Whittlesey, Norman K., 1998. "The Effect Of Stochastic Irrigation Demands And Surface Water Supplies On On-Farm Water Management," Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 23(1), pages 1-19, July.
    14. Bernard V. Tew & Donald W. Reid, 1987. "More Evidence On Expected Value-Variance Analysis Versus Direct Utility Maximization," Journal of Financial Research, Southern Finance Association;Southwestern Finance Association, vol. 10(3), pages 249-257, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:ajagec:v:65:y:1983:i:4:p:694-702.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aaeaaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.