IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/ajagec/v54y1972i3p503-506..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Reliability of Using the Mean Absolute Deviation to Derive Efficient E,V Farm Plans

Author

Listed:
  • K. J. Thomson
  • P. B. R. Hazell

Abstract

A linear programming approximation using the mean absolute deviation can be used to derive efficient E,V farm plans when a suitable quadratic programming computer code is not available. This note reports a Monte Carlo simulation study designed to test the accuracy of this method, and concludes that it is more reliable than previously thought.

Suggested Citation

  • K. J. Thomson & P. B. R. Hazell, 1972. "Reliability of Using the Mean Absolute Deviation to Derive Efficient E,V Farm Plans," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 54(3), pages 503-506.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:ajagec:v:54:y:1972:i:3:p:503-506.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.2307/1239169
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Collender, Robert N., 1988. "Normative Economics under Uncertainty and Risk Aversion: The Land Allocation Problem Revisited," Department of Economics and Business - Archive 259432, North Carolina State University, Department of Economics.
    2. Sherrick, Bruce J. & Irwin, Scott H. & Forster, D. Lynn, 1986. "Returns to Capital in Agriculture: A Historical View Using Portfolio Theory," 1986 Annual Meeting, July 27-30, Reno, Nevada 278457, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    3. Petrick, Martin & Ditges, C. Markus, 2000. "Risk In Agriculture As Impediment To Rural Lending - The Case Of North-Western Kazakhstan," IAMO Discussion Papers 14939, Institute of Agricultural Development in Transition Economies (IAMO).
    4. Zuckerkandel, Karen & Elterich, G. Joachim, 1983. "Risk and Return in Field Crops as Compared to Processing Vegetables on the Delmarva Peninsula," Journal of the Northeastern Agricultural Economics Council, Northeastern Agricultural and Resource Economics Association, vol. 12(2), pages 1-8.
    5. Lichtenberg, Erik, 1990. "Determination of Regional Environmental Policy Under Uncertainty: Theory and Case Studies," Working Papers 197748, University of Maryland, Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics.
    6. Schoney, R. A., 1990. "An Analysis of Wheat Supply Response Under Risk and Uncertainty," Working Papers 244030, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada.
    7. Adesina, A. A. & Ouattara, A. D., 2000. "Risk and agricultural systems in northern Cote d'Ivoire," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 66(1), pages 17-32, October.
    8. Angirasa, Aditi K. & Shumway, C. Richard & Nelsen, T. C. & Cartwright, T. C., 1981. "Integration, Risk, and Supply Response: A Simulation and Linear Programming Analysis of An East Texas Cow-Calf Producer," Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 13(1), pages 89-98, July.
    9. Bechtel, Amos I. & Young, Douglas L., 1999. "The Importance Of Using Farm Level Risk Estimates In Crp Enrollment Decisions," 1999 Annual Meeting, July 11-14, 1999, Fargo, ND 35717, Western Agricultural Economics Association.
    10. Throsby, C.D., 1973. "New Methodologies in Agricultural Production Economics: a Review," 1973 Conference, August 19-30, 1973, São Paulo, Brazil 181385, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    11. Jock R. Anderson, 1975. "Programming For Efficient Planning Against Non‐Normal Risk," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 19(2), pages 94-107, August.
    12. Zuckerkandel, Karen & Elterich, G. Joachim, 1983. "Risk and Return in Field Crops as Compared to Processing Vegetables on the Delmarva Peninsula," Northeastern Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Northeastern Agricultural and Resource Economics Association, vol. 0(Number 2), pages 1-8.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:ajagec:v:54:y:1972:i:3:p:503-506.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aaeaaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.