IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/osi/journl/v6y2010p776-800.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Provincialism Of Global Brands An Empirical Analysis Of Brand Equity Differences In Mexico And Germany

Author

Listed:
  • Thomas Cleff

    (Pforzheim University; and Research Associate at the Centre for European Economic Research (ZEW) Mannheim, Germany)

  • Lena Fischer

    (Master student at University of Groningen, Netherlands)

  • Nadine Walter

    (Pforzheim University, Germany)

Abstract

The term “global brand” has become widely used by the media and by consumers. Although media and consumers call these brands “global” and centralized marketing departments manage these brands globally – are these “global brands” really global? Can we talk about truly global brand equity? And if there were brand image differences between countries, which factors cause them? The authors conducted an empirical research during May and June 2009 with similarly aged University students in Germany (n=426) and Mexico (n=296). The goal was to identify if brand awareness rates differ between Germans and Mexicans, if the brand image of Apple iPod is perceived in the same way in Germany and in Mexico and what influencing factors might have an impact on any brand image discrepancy between the countries. Results prove that brand recall rates differ between the two countries as well as brand image attributes vary significantly, with Mexico showing higher levels of favorable brand image attributes. Key influencing factors on the different brand image perceptions are perceived quality, satisfaction and the influence of reference groups. The results suggest that so-called “global brands” are not perceived the same way in Germany and Mexico. As a consequence, brand management using standardized marketing instruments for its presumable “global brands” might be better off with a more differentiated approach that takes into account a specific local brand image.

Suggested Citation

  • Thomas Cleff & Lena Fischer & Nadine Walter, 2010. "The Provincialism Of Global Brands An Empirical Analysis Of Brand Equity Differences In Mexico And Germany," Interdisciplinary Management Research, Josip Juraj Strossmayer University of Osijek, Faculty of Economics, Croatia, vol. 6, pages 776-800.
  • Handle: RePEc:osi:journl:v:6:y:2010:p:776-800
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.efos.unios.hr/repec/osi/journl/PDF/InterdisciplinaryManagementResearchVI/IMR6a59.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Cleff, Thomas & Fischer, Lena & Sepúlveda, César & Walter, Nadine, 2010. "How global are global brands? An empirical brand equity analysis," Beiträge der Hochschule Pforzheim 136, Pforzheim University.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Neuer, Kim Dobbie, 2010. "Achieving Lisbon: The EU's R&D challenge. The role of the public sector and implications of US best practice on regional policymaking in Europe," Beiträge der Hochschule Pforzheim 137, Pforzheim University.
    2. Müller, Daniel Wyn, 2012. "Titanschäume als Knochenimplantat," Beiträge der Hochschule Pforzheim 142, Pforzheim University.
    3. Gildeggen, Rainer & Willburger, Andreas, 2016. "What constitutes a compensation free regulation of foreign-owned property in international law? Some thoughts on the protection of foreign investment against expropriations, the states' right to regul," Beiträge der Hochschule Pforzheim 160, Pforzheim University.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Global Marketing; Global Brand; Brand Equity; Brand Image; Brand Awareness; Brand Analysis; Cross-country Comparison;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • C21 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Single Equation Models; Single Variables - - - Cross-Sectional Models; Spatial Models; Treatment Effect Models
    • M31 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Marketing and Advertising - - - Marketing

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:osi:journl:v:6:y:2010:p:776-800. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Hrvoje Serdarusic, PhD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/efosihr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.