IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ora/journl/v1y2020i2p116-125.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Innovative Enterprises In Serbia And Romania

Author

Listed:
  • STAN Lavinia

    (Doctoral School of Economics, Faculty of Economic Sciences, University of Oradea, Oradea, Romania)

Abstract

The well-being of the population depends on the ability of innovative enterprises to adapt to the needs of people in perpetual change. Workers capable of innovation are becoming more and more sought after on the labor markets, being the pillars of the innovative ensemble in national enterprises. In this article we have made a comparative analysis of existing innovative enterprises in Serbia and Romania, during the years 2010-2016. The research is based on the observation and analysis of data provided by the statistical offices of both countries. The importance of this analysis is given by the establishment of the existing discrepancies and similarities between the innovative enterprises from Serbia and Romania, as well as the identification of the existing deficiencies within the development of these activities.The companies on the Romanian territory were in a continuous decreasing trend, highlighting the low investments made in the field of innovation, as well as a poor opening to foreign markets. At the opposite pole, Serbia, which despite not integrating into the European Union, shows an increasing trend of innovative enterprises. However, there are still areas for improvement, with the aim of synchronizing innovative enterprises in the two countries with enterprises in countries around the world, recognized for their innovative activities. The innovative centers in the two countries are located in the Beogradski region of Serbia and the Bucharest-Ilfov region of Romania.

Suggested Citation

  • STAN Lavinia, 2020. "Innovative Enterprises In Serbia And Romania," Annals of Faculty of Economics, University of Oradea, Faculty of Economics, vol. 1(2), pages 116-125, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:ora:journl:v:1:y:2020:i:2:p:116-125
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://anale.steconomiceuoradea.ro/volume/2020/n2/010.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gerhard Wegner, 2019. "Entrepreneurship in autocratic regimes – how neo-patrimonialism constrains innovation," Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Springer, vol. 29(5), pages 1507-1529, November.
    2. Martijn Boermans & Hein Roelfsema, 2015. "The Effects of Internationalization on Innovation: Firm-Level Evidence for Transition Economies," Open Economies Review, Springer, vol. 26(2), pages 333-350, April.
    3. Robert Stackowiak, 2019. "Remaining Relevant in Your Tech Career," Springer Books, Springer, number 978-1-4842-3703-8, January.
    4. Myint Moe Chit, 2018. "Political openness and the growth of small and medium enterprises: empirical evidence from transition economies," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 55(2), pages 781-804, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Alexandra Braga & Carla Susana Marques & Zélia Serrasqueiro, 2018. "Internationalisation Strategy of Knowledge-Intensive Business Services," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 9(2), pages 359-377, June.
    2. Martínez-Román, Juan A. & Gamero, Javier & Delgado-González, María de Loreto & Tamayo, Juan A., 2019. "Innovativeness and internationalization in SMEs: An empirical analysis in European countries," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 148(C).
    3. Lukasz Arendt & Wojciech Grabowski, 2019. "The role of firm-level factors and regional innovation capabilities for Polish SMEs," Journal of Entrepreneurship, Management and Innovation, Fundacja Upowszechniająca Wiedzę i Naukę "Cognitione", vol. 15(3), pages 11-44.
    4. Wioletta Mierzejewska & Maria Aluchna & Emilia Tomczyk, 2023. "Do coopetition and cohesion of business groups stimulate their innovation performance?," DECISION: Official Journal of the Indian Institute of Management Calcutta, Springer;Indian Institute of Management Calcutta, vol. 50(2), pages 153-168, June.
    5. Michael A. Abebe & Yamlaksira S. Getachew & Sarah Kimakwa, 2022. "Entrepreneurs’ Ethnic and Political Identity Alignment as Determinants of Access to Government Support in Africa: A Conceptual Framework," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 46(2), pages 449-476, March.
    6. Niklas Elert & Magnus Henrekson, 2021. "Entrepreneurship prompts institutional change in developing economies," The Review of Austrian Economics, Springer;Society for the Development of Austrian Economics, vol. 34(1), pages 33-53, March.
    7. Fabio Distefano & Giacomo Gambillara & Alberto Di Minin, 2016. "Extending the Innovation Paradigm: a Double ‘I’ Environment and Some Evidence from BRIC Countries," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 7(1), pages 126-154, March.
    8. Rodríguez-Pose, Andrés & Hardy, Daniel, 2017. "Firm competitiveness and regional disparities in Georgia," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 67543, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    9. Dung Nguyen‐Van & Chia‐Hua Chang, 2021. "Internationalization and product innovation in ASEAN: The moderating role of organizational innovation," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 42(2), pages 437-462, March.
    10. Samuel AMPONSAH ODEI & Michael AMPONSAH ODEI & Henry Junior ANDERSON, 2020. "Consultants and firm-level innovation performances: a doubly robust estimation approach," Eastern Journal of European Studies, Centre for European Studies, Alexandru Ioan Cuza University, vol. 11, pages 288-311, December.
    11. Umut Kılınç, 2018. "Assessing Productivity Gains from International Trade in a Small Open Economy," Open Economies Review, Springer, vol. 29(5), pages 953-980, November.
    12. Xu, Tao & Zhu, Weiwei, 2022. "Entrepreneurs or Employees: What Chinese Citizens Encouraged to Become by Social Attitudes?," MPRA Paper 113212, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    13. Singh, Rashmeet & Chandrashekar, Deepak & Subrahmanya Mungila Hillemane, Bala & Sukumar, Arun & Jafari-Sadeghi, Vahid, 2022. "Network cooperation and economic performance of SMEs: Direct and mediating impacts of innovation and internationalisation," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 148(C), pages 116-130.
    14. Joachim Wagner, 2018. "Multiple Import Sourcing. First Evidence for German Enterprises from Manufacturing Industries," Open Economies Review, Springer, vol. 29(1), pages 165-175, February.
    15. Rodríguez, Alicia & Hernández, Virginia & Nieto, María Jesús, 2022. "International and domestic external knowledge in the innovation performance of firms from transition economies: The role of institutions," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 176(C).
    16. Andrew Smith & Graham Brownlow, 2023. "Informal Institutions as Inhibitors of Rent-Seeking Entrepreneurship: Evidence From U.S. Legal History," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 47(6), pages 2323-2346, November.
    17. Farhad Uddin Ahmed & Louis Brennan, 2019. "Performance determinants of early internationalizing firms: The role of international entrepreneurial orientation," Journal of International Entrepreneurship, Springer, vol. 17(3), pages 389-424, September.
    18. Vladimír Baláž & Tomáš Jeck & Miroslav Balog, 2023. "Firm performance over innovation cycle: evidence from a small European economy," Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, Springer, vol. 12(1), pages 1-23, December.
    19. Valeria A. Arsenyevа & Svetlana A. Litvinova & Valentina N. Parakhina & Zinaida N. Kozenko & Mikhail Y. Denisov, 2016. "Innovational Development for Transitional Economy – Russia Case Study," Contemporary Economics, University of Economics and Human Sciences in Warsaw., vol. 10(4), December.
    20. Liliana Meza González, 2016. "Internacionalización y creación de nuevos productos y procesos en la industria manufacturera mexicana," Estudios Económicos, El Colegio de México, Centro de Estudios Económicos, vol. 31(2), pages 235-263.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    innovation; enterprises; Serbia; Romania;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • O14 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economic Development - - - Industrialization; Manufacturing and Service Industries; Choice of Technology
    • O31 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - Innovation and Invention: Processes and Incentives
    • O32 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - Management of Technological Innovation and R&D

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ora:journl:v:1:y:2020:i:2:p:116-125. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catalin ZMOLE (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/feoraro.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.