IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ora/journl/v1y2020i1p284-292.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Do Romanian Companies And Their Stakeholders Benefit From The Advantages Of A Good Corporate Governance? Empirical Research On The Level Of Compliance

Author

Listed:
  • MIHALCEA Mihaela Maria

    (Department of Doctoral Accounting Studies, "1 Decembrie 1918" University of Alba Iulia, Romania)

Abstract

Corporate governance is a topical subject interrelated with many other concepts such as financial performance and earnings management and also a topic of real interest especially to shareholders and potential investors, but also to other stakeholders. The advantages attributed to corporate governance (maximizing global and long-term financial performance, increasing transparency and investor confidence) are the impetus for carrying out the present paper by asking a question related to approaching the concept in our country and, more importantly, the extent to which the principles of corporate governance are applied practically. The specialized literature in Romania has been dealing intensely with the subject in recent years, both through theoretical and empirical studies. The present empirical research is carried out among the companies listed on the regulated market of the Bucharest Stock Exchange in 2017 for which we analyzed the Statement on compliance with the provisions of the Corporate Governance Code issued by the Bucharest Stock Exchange.The results show that 40% of the analyzed companies apply more than 75% of the principles of the Code regarding the responsibilities of the board of directors, the risk management system and the internal control, to the just reward and motivation and last but not least, to the relationship with investors, to transparency. Moreover, 66% of the analyzed companies apply over 50% of the principles. Comparing the results obtained with the results of other studies from the past, we appreciate a positive evolution of the corporate governance in Romania, obtaining for 2017 an average compliance score of 58% with growth prospects, considering the mentions regarding the implementation process of certain criteria stated by some companies. However, at EU level, Romania occupies the last positions in some aspects regarding corporate governance according to indicators published by the World Economic Forum.

Suggested Citation

  • MIHALCEA Mihaela Maria, 2020. "Do Romanian Companies And Their Stakeholders Benefit From The Advantages Of A Good Corporate Governance? Empirical Research On The Level Of Compliance," Annals of Faculty of Economics, University of Oradea, Faculty of Economics, vol. 1(1), pages 284-292, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:ora:journl:v:1:y:2020:i:1:p:284-292
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://anale.steconomiceuoradea.ro/volume/2020/n1/026.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Maria MANOLESCU & Aureliana-Geta ROMAN & Mihaela MOCANU, 2011. "Corporate Governance in Romania: from Regulation to Implementation," Journal of Accounting and Management Information Systems, Faculty of Accounting and Management Information Systems, The Bucharest University of Economic Studies, vol. 10(1), pages 4-24, March.
    2. Lawrence Brown & Marcus Caylor, 2009. "Corporate governance and firm operating performance," Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Springer, vol. 32(2), pages 129-144, February.
    3. Patricia M. Dechow & Richard G. Sloan & Amy P. Sweeney, 1996. "Causes and Consequences of Earnings Manipulation: An Analysis of Firms Subject to Enforcement Actions by the SEC," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 13(1), pages 1-36, March.
    4. John E. Core & Wayne R. Guay & Tjomme O. Rusticus, 2006. "Does Weak Governance Cause Weak Stock Returns? An Examination of Firm Operating Performance and Investors' Expectations," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 61(2), pages 655-687, April.
    5. Irene Karamanou & Nikos Vafeas, 2005. "The Association between Corporate Boards, Audit Committees, and Management Earnings Forecasts: An Empirical Analysis," Journal of Accounting Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 43(3), pages 453-486, June.
    6. Alina Beattrice Vladu & Dumitru MatiÅŸ, 2010. "Corporate Governance And Creative Accounting: Two Concepts Strongly Connected? Some Intersting Insights Highlighted By Constructing The Internal History Of A Literature," Annales Universitatis Apulensis Series Oeconomica, Faculty of Sciences, "1 Decembrie 1918" University, Alba Iulia, vol. 1(12), pages 1-33.
    7. Ryan Davidson & Jenny Goodwin‐Stewart & Pamela Kent, 2005. "Internal governance structures and earnings management," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 45(2), pages 241-267, July.
    8. Erickson, John & Park, Yun W. & Reising, Joe & Shin, Hyun-Han, 2005. "Board composition and firm value under concentrated ownership: the Canadian evidence," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 13(4), pages 387-410, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Nancy Harp & Mark Myring & Rebecca Shortridge, 2014. "Do Variations in the Strength of Corporate Governance Still Matter? A Comparison of the Pre- and Post-Regulation Environment," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 122(3), pages 361-373, July.
    2. David B. Bryan & Terry W. Mason, 2023. "Lead independent directors and accruals quality," Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 50(3-4), pages 660-679, March.
    3. Jacqueline Christensen & Pamela Kent & Jenny Stewart, 2010. "Corporate Governance and Company Performance in Australia," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 20(4), pages 372-386, December.
    4. Mohamed Khalil & Aydin Ozkan, 2016. "Board Independence, Audit Quality and Earnings Management: Evidence from Egypt," Journal of Emerging Market Finance, Institute for Financial Management and Research, vol. 15(1), pages 84-118, April.
    5. Haß, Lars Helge & Vergauwe, Skrålan & Zhang, Qiyu, 2014. "Corporate governance and the information environment: Evidence from Chinese stock markets," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 36(C), pages 106-119.
    6. Husam Aldamen & Keith Duncan & Simone Kelly & Ray McNamara & Stephan Nagel, 2012. "Audit committee characteristics and firm performance during the global financial crisis," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 52(4), pages 971-1000, December.
    7. Mehdi Bouras & Mohamed Imen Gallali, 2017. "Earnings Management, Equity-based Compensation, Economic Conjuncture and Governance Mechanisms: A Comparative Study between France and the United States," International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, Econjournals, vol. 7(2), pages 585-600.
    8. Simeng Liu & Kun Tracy Wang & Yue Wu, 2024. "Corporate Governance Reforms and Analyst Forecasts: International Evidence," Abacus, Accounting Foundation, University of Sydney, vol. 60(2), pages 272-304, June.
    9. Anis Mnif, 2009. "Corporate Governance And Management Earnings Forecast Quality: Evidence From French Ipos," Post-Print halshs-00459171, HAL.
    10. David B. Bryan & Terry W. Mason, 2020. "Independent director reputation incentives, accruals quality and audit fees," Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 47(7-8), pages 982-1011, July.
    11. Balachandran, Balasingham & Faff, Robert, 2015. "Corporate governance, firm value and risk: Past, present, and future," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 35(PA), pages 1-12.
    12. Jacqueline Christensen & Pamela Kent & James Routledge & Jenny Stewart & Gary Monroe, 2015. "Do corporate governance recommendations improve the performance and accountability of small listed companies?," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 55(1), pages 133-164, March.
    13. Martin Kyere & Marcel Ausloos, 2021. "Corporate governance and firms financial performance in the United Kingdom," International Journal of Finance & Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 26(2), pages 1871-1885, April.
    14. Carol Liu, M.H. & Zhuang, Zili, 2011. "Management earnings forecasts and the quality of analysts’ forecasts: The moderating effect of audit committees," Journal of Contemporary Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 7(1), pages 31-45.
    15. James Routledge & David Morrison, 2012. "Insolvency administration as a strategic response to financial distress," Australian Journal of Management, Australian School of Business, vol. 37(3), pages 441-459, December.
    16. Al-Faryan, Mamdouh Abdulaziz Saleh, 2017. "The relationship between corporate governance mechanisms and the performance of Saudi listed firms," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 14(2-2), pages 338-349.
    17. Pamela Kent & James Routledge & Jenny Stewart, 2010. "Innate and discretionary accruals quality and corporate governance," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 50(1), pages 171-195, March.
    18. Intan Suryani Abu Bakar & Arifur Khan & Paul Mather & George Tanewski, 2020. "Board monitoring and covenant restrictiveness in private debt contracts during the global financial crisis," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 60(S1), pages 661-692, April.
    19. Lonkani, Ravi, 2019. "Gender differences and managerial earnings forecast bias: Are female executives less overconfident than male executives?," Emerging Markets Review, Elsevier, vol. 38(C), pages 18-34.
    20. Xiangyu Chen & Muhammad Safdar Sial & Dang Khoa Tran & Waseem Alhaddad & Jinsoo Hwang & Phung Anh Thu, 2020. "Are Socially Responsible Companies Really Ethical? The Moderating Role of State-Owned Enterprises: Evidence from China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-19, April.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    corporate governance; protection of shareholders’ interests; transparency; financial reporting quality; performance;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • G34 - Financial Economics - - Corporate Finance and Governance - - - Mergers; Acquisitions; Restructuring; Corporate Governance
    • O16 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economic Development - - - Financial Markets; Saving and Capital Investment; Corporate Finance and Governance
    • M41 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Accounting - - - Accounting
    • M49 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Accounting - - - Other

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ora:journl:v:1:y:2020:i:1:p:284-292. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catalin ZMOLE (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/feoraro.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.