IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ora/journl/v1y2020i1p252-263.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparative Analysis Of Hungarian And Romanian Stock Market Indices In Context Of Covid-19

Author

Listed:
  • KULCSÁR Edina

    (Partium Christian University, Faculty of Economics and Social Science, Department of Economics, Oradea, Romania)

Abstract

The coronavirus pandemic, erupted in 2019, re-emphasized the importance of dealing with risk and uncertainty. In addition to difficulties caused in public and health sectors, the negative consequences of COVID-19 outbreak are more and more obvious also in economy. The rapidly spread of virus from China to Europe and U.S., seriously tests the countries’ ability to deal with such an unexpected situations, both health-wise and economically. As the same time, measures adopted by governments like travel restrictions have further amplify the difficulties in some aspects. In response to growing uncertainty, individuals have suddenly changed their consumer behaviour, manifested in excessive food purchases which caused certain food products shortage. Companies have restrained production and spending. Some categories of services are particularly affected, restaurants and hotel units temporarily fully suspended their activities. There are also serious transport restrictions, airlines cancelled several flights. The news of the outbreak of the novel coronavirus, the rapid spread worldwide, and the measures taken by governments, the panic reactions of individuals and companies, negatively impact the economic and financial stability. The negative effects caused by the coronavirus affect relatively quickly the financial markets, which show terrible volatilities. On March 18, 2020, the stock market prices declined more than 30% compared to the peak price value of recent years, which can be considered significant. Since the outbreak of the coronavirus pandemic, several articles deals with the impact of virus-induced uncertainty on volatility. The results related studies highlights the correlation between COVID-19 cases, deaths and different stock indices price volatility. Based on these, the aim of this article is to examine the relationship between the main stock indices, namely BUX and BET of two neighbouring countries in Central and Eastern Europe (Romania and Hungary) and the COVID-19 cases in European Union. In order to investigate this relationship we used simple linear regression. The results show that in both countries’ stock indices case there is medium-strong correlation between BUX (R=0,6651), BET (R=0,6001) and COVID-19 European Union’s cases. By investigation of stock indices changes in the analysed period we can conclude that the time of reaction of stock markets and the intensity of stock prices changes is quite different in case of BUX (36,27%) and BET (31,12%).

Suggested Citation

  • KULCSÁR Edina, 2020. "Comparative Analysis Of Hungarian And Romanian Stock Market Indices In Context Of Covid-19," Annals of Faculty of Economics, University of Oradea, Faculty of Economics, vol. 1(1), pages 252-263, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:ora:journl:v:1:y:2020:i:1:p:252-263
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://anale.steconomiceuoradea.ro/volume/2020/n1/023.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Scott R. Baker & Nicholas Bloom & Steven J. Davis & Stephen J. Terry, 2020. "COVID-Induced Economic Uncertainty," NBER Working Papers 26983, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    2. Niels Joachim Gormsen & Ralph S J Koijen & Nikolai Roussanov, 0. "Coronavirus: Impact on Stock Prices and Growth Expectations," The Review of Asset Pricing Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 10(4), pages 574-597.
    3. Claudiu Albulescu, 2020. "Coronavirus and financial volatility: 40 days of fasting and fear," Papers 2003.04005, arXiv.org.
    4. Scott R. Baker & Nicholas Bloom & Steven J. Davis & Kyle J. Kost & Marco C. Sammon & Tasaneeya Viratyosin, 2020. "The Unprecedented Stock Market Impact of COVID-19," NBER Working Papers 26945, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    5. repec:aei:rpaper:1008560098 is not listed on IDEAS
    6. Hartwell, Christopher A., 2018. "The impact of institutional volatility on financial volatility in transition economies," Journal of Comparative Economics, Elsevier, vol. 46(2), pages 598-615.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. P. K. Mishra & S. K. Mishra, 2020. "Corona Pandemic and Stock Market Behaviour: Empirical Insights from Selected Asian Countries," Millennial Asia, , vol. 11(3), pages 341-365, December.
    2. Wright, Austin L. & Sonin, Konstantin & Driscoll, Jesse & Wilson, Jarnickae, 2020. "Poverty and economic dislocation reduce compliance with COVID-19 shelter-in-place protocols," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 180(C), pages 544-554.
    3. Guglielmo Maria Caporale & Woo-Young Kang & Fabio Spagnolo & Nicola Spagnolo, 2022. "The COVID-19 pandemic, policy responses and stock markets in the G20," International Economics, CEPII research center, issue 172, pages 77-90.
    4. Prelorentzos, Arsenios-Georgios N. & Konstantakis, Konstantinos N. & Michaelides, Panayotis G. & Xidonas, Panos & Goutte, Stephane & Thomakos, Dimitrios D., 2024. "Introducing the GVAR-GARCH model: Evidence from financial markets," Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    5. Greta Keliuotyte-Staniuleniene & Julius Kviklis, 2021. "Assessing the reaction of the Baltic stock market to the spread of the COVID-19 pandemic," Technium Social Sciences Journal, Technium Science, vol. 25(1), pages 260-272, November.
    6. Ștefan Cristian Gherghina & Daniel Ștefan Armeanu & Camelia Cătălina Joldeș, 2020. "Stock Market Reactions to COVID-19 Pandemic Outbreak: Quantitative Evidence from ARDL Bounds Tests and Granger Causality Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(18), pages 1-35, September.
    7. Jialei Jiang & Eun-Mi Park & Seong-Taek Park, 2021. "The Impact of the COVID-19 on Economic Sustainability—A Case Study of Fluctuation in Stock Prices for China and South Korea," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-17, June.
    8. Jesper Akesson & Sam Ashworth-Hayes & Robert Hahn & Robert Metcalfe & Itzhak Rasooly, 2022. "Fatalism, beliefs, and behaviors during the COVID-19 pandemic," Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, Springer, vol. 64(2), pages 147-190, April.
    9. Bouoiyour, Jamal & Gauthier, Marie & Bouri, Elie, 2023. "Which is leading: Renewable or brown energy assets?," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 117(C).
    10. Richard Mawulawoe Ahadzie & Dan Daugaard & Moses Kangogo & Faisal Khan & Joaquin Vespignani, 2024. "COVID‐19, Mobility Restriction Policies and Stock Market Volatility: A Cross‐Country Empirical Study," Economic Papers, The Economic Society of Australia, vol. 43(2), pages 184-203, June.
    11. Michal Bernardelli & Zbigniew Korzeb & Pawel Niedziolka, 2021. "The banking sector as the absorber of the COVID-19 crisis’ economic consequences: perception of WSE investors," Oeconomia Copernicana, Institute of Economic Research, vol. 12(2), pages 335-374, June.
    12. Wifo, 2020. "WIFO-Monatsberichte, Heft 5/2020," WIFO Monatsberichte (monthly reports), WIFO, vol. 93(5), May.
    13. Bejaoui, Azza & Mgadmi, Nidhal & Moussa, Wajdi, 2022. "On the relationship between Bitcoin and other assets during the outbreak of coronavirus: Evidence from fractional cointegration analysis," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 77(C).
    14. Ammari, Aymen & Chebbi, Kaouther & Ben Arfa, Nouha, 2023. "How does the COVID-19 pandemic shape the relationship between Twitter sentiment and stock liquidity of US firms?," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 88(C).
    15. Alina Butu & Ioan Sebastian Brumă & Lucian Tanasă & Steliana Rodino & Codrin Dinu Vasiliu & Sebastian Doboș & Marian Butu, 2020. "The Impact of COVID-19 Crisis upon the Consumer Buying Behavior of Fresh Vegetables Directly from Local Producers. Case Study: The Quarantined Area of Suceava County, Romania," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(15), pages 1-25, July.
    16. Ahelegbey, Daniel Felix & Cerchiello, Paola & Scaramozzino, Roberta, 2022. "Network based evidence of the financial impact of Covid-19 pandemic," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 81(C).
    17. Croce, Mariano & Farroni, Paolo & Wolfskeil, Isabella, 2020. "When the Markets Get COVID: COntagion, Viruses, and Information Diffusion," CEPR Discussion Papers 14674, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    18. Shibata, Ippei, 2021. "The distributional impact of recessions: The global financial crisis and the COVID-19 pandemic recession," Journal of Economics and Business, Elsevier, vol. 115(C).
    19. Wang, Lipeng & Zhang, Mengyu & Verousis, Thanos, 2021. "The road to economic recovery: Pandemics and innovation," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 75(C).
    20. Herjuna Qobush Izzahdi & Ani Wilujeng Suryani, 2023. "COVID-19 Vaccination, Government Strict Policy and Capital Market Volatility: Evidence from ASEAN Countries," Economic Studies journal, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences - Economic Research Institute, issue 2, pages 117-135.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    risk; uncertainty; COVID-19; pandemic; financial crisis; stock market index; volatility;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • G01 - Financial Economics - - General - - - Financial Crises
    • G15 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - International Financial Markets
    • G18 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - Government Policy and Regulation
    • G3 - Financial Economics - - Corporate Finance and Governance
    • G30 - Financial Economics - - Corporate Finance and Governance - - - General
    • G32 - Financial Economics - - Corporate Finance and Governance - - - Financing Policy; Financial Risk and Risk Management; Capital and Ownership Structure; Value of Firms; Goodwill

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ora:journl:v:1:y:2020:i:1:p:252-263. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catalin ZMOLE The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask Catalin ZMOLE to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/feoraro.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.