IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ora/journl/v1y2019i2p385-394.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Innovation And Competitiveness

Author

Listed:
  • MARINCEAN Dan Andrei

    (University of Oradea, Oradea, Romania)

Abstract

This study, addresses the topic of industrial innovation in today's competitive markets and reaches the importance of competitiveness indicators. Any entrepreneurial attempt to produce and promote new and up-to-date products should be carried out, following appropriate mathematical calculations, based on the study of competition, through competitiveness indicators. The concept of innovation will be further investigated in terms of its influence, on industrialized environments. Industrial innovation is conditioned by several specific factors, among which we can list: clear business strategies; setting clearly formulated objectives; correct financing within management programs that benefit the entire innovation activity; the existence of a competent team, that can solve the problems that arise during the innovation projects; the existence of a clear and correct procedure for evaluating the results and the work of the people employed; the existence of a competitive climate inside the company and outside of it, etc. Innovation deals primarily with the introduction of new concepts and values. The present study, serves the tranzition from conceptualizing competition and competitiveness, through competition indicators, to an easier understanding of innovation, as a necessity for future industrial and commercial development. Of course, the stages of a successful innovative-creative plan includes calculations of competitiveness and market studies, all of which form the object of the activity of some institutions dealing with the part of industrial research and development. The part of economic calculations is summarized in this plan, to a set of formulas and calculations of competitive indicators, which need to be drawn up more for the study of innovation, than for the part of entrepreneurial competitiveness. This is why a breakdown between the innovation part and the study part of the competitiveness indicators, can be produced here. It is important to research in this context also the fact that innovation management, as well as technological management, approaches innovation from an organizational point of view. Innovation in the organizational context, is aimed primarily at the renewal of products and technologies, but also the application of organizational management norms. Innovation management is defined as part of performance management. The innovation rules must be formulated in accordance with the competition rules, hence the need to study the competitiveness indicators in relation to the market and the degree of industrialization. Also, in the future, it becomes imperative to regulate innovation management, stressing that innovation and competition must be controlled with the help of the state or some control and evaluation institutions.

Suggested Citation

  • MARINCEAN Dan Andrei, 2019. "Innovation And Competitiveness," Annals of Faculty of Economics, University of Oradea, Faculty of Economics, vol. 1(2), pages 385-394, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:ora:journl:v:1:y:2019:i:2:p:385-394
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://anale.steconomiceuoradea.ro/volume/2019/n2/038.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Utterback, James M & Abernathy, William J, 1975. "A dynamic model of process and product innovation," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 3(6), pages 639-656, December.
    2. Mereuta, Cezar & Albu, Lucian Liviu & Iordan, Marioara & Chilian, Mihaela Nona, 2007. "A Model to Evaluate the Regional Competitiveness of the EU Regions," Journal for Economic Forecasting, Institute for Economic Forecasting, vol. 4(3), pages 81-102, September.
    3. Raymond Vernon, 1966. "International Investment and International Trade in the Product Cycle," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 80(2), pages 190-207.
    4. Madalina-Gabriela ANGHEL & Constantin ANGHELACHE & Tudor SAMSON, 2017. "Analysis Of Quarterly Gdp Evolution In Real Terms In 2017," Romanian Statistical Review Supplement, Romanian Statistical Review, vol. 65(12), pages 127-136, December.
    5. Andreas Mitschke, 2008. "The Influence of National Competition Policy on the International Competitiveness of Nations," Contributions to Economics, Springer, number 978-3-7908-2036-2, May.
    6. Stigler, George J., 1982. "The Process and Progress of Economics," Nobel Prize in Economics documents 1982-1, Nobel Prize Committee.
    7. Stigler, George J., 1983. "The Organization of Industry," University of Chicago Press Economics Books, University of Chicago Press, number 9780226774329, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Peter Mugo & Jimmy Macharia, 2020. "Technological innovation and competitive advantage in telecommunication companies in Kenya," International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science (2147-4478), Center for the Strategic Studies in Business and Finance, vol. 9(5), pages 38-47, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Michaela Trippl & Markus Grillitsch & Arne Isaksen & Tanja Sinozic, 2015. "Perspectives on Cluster Evolution: Critical Review and Future Research Issues," European Planning Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(10), pages 2028-2044, October.
    2. Williams, Christopher & van Triest, Sander, 2009. "The impact of corporate and national cultures on decentralization in multinational corporations," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 18(2), pages 156-167, April.
    3. Karima Kourtit & Peter Nijkamp, 2013. "In Search Of Creative Champions In High-Tech Spaces: A Spatial Application Of Strategic Performance Management," Journal of Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 53(5), pages 749-777, December.
    4. Karlsson, Charlie & Johansson, Börje, 2006. "Regional Development and Knowledge," Working Paper Series in Economics and Institutions of Innovation 76, Royal Institute of Technology, CESIS - Centre of Excellence for Science and Innovation Studies.
    5. Mike Hobday, 1994. "Export‐led Technology Development in the Four Dragons: The Case of Electronics," Development and Change, International Institute of Social Studies, vol. 25(2), pages 333-361, April.
    6. Bos, Jaap W.B. & Economidou, Claire & Sanders, Mark W.J.L., 2013. "Innovation over the industry life-cycle: Evidence from EU manufacturing," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 78-91.
    7. Keun Lee, 2009. "How Can Korea be a Role Model for Catch-up Development?: A 'Capability-based View'," WIDER Working Paper Series RP2009-34, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
    8. Hernandez-Negron, Christian G. & Baker, Erin & Goldstein, Anna P., 2023. "A hypothesis for experience curves of related technologies with an application to wind energy," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 184(C).
    9. Sam Tavassoli & Nunzia Carbonara, 2014. "The role of knowledge variety and intensity for regional innovation," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 43(2), pages 493-509, August.
    10. Tavassoli, Sam, 2015. "Innovation determinants over industry life cycle," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 18-32.
    11. Lee, Keun & Lim, Chaisung, 2001. "Technological regimes, catching-up and leapfrogging: findings from the Korean industries," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 30(3), pages 459-483, March.
    12. Sam Tavassoli & Babak Kianian & Tobias C. Larsson, 2015. "Manufacturing renaissance: return of manufacturing to western countries," Chapters, in: Charlie Karlsson & Urban Gråsjö & Sofia Wixe (ed.), Innovation and Entrepreneurship in the Global Economy, chapter 11, pages 261-280, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    13. Yuandi Wang & Nadine Roijakkers & Wim Vanhaverbeke, 2014. "How fast do Chinese firms learn and catch up? Evidence from patent citations," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 98(1), pages 743-761, January.
    14. Beneito, Pilar & Rochina-Barrachina, María Engracia & Sanchis, Amparo, 2014. "Learning through experience in Research & Development: An empirical analysis with Spanish firms," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 290-305.
    15. Huenteler, Joern & Schmidt, Tobias S. & Ossenbrink, Jan & Hoffmann, Volker H., 2016. "Technology life-cycles in the energy sector — Technological characteristics and the role of deployment for innovation," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 102-121.
    16. Magdalena Olczyk, 2016. "A systematic retrieval of international competitiveness literature: a bibliometric study," Eurasian Economic Review, Springer;Eurasia Business and Economics Society, vol. 6(3), pages 429-457, December.
    17. James E. Bessen, 2010. "Communicating Technical Knowledge," Levine's Working Paper Archive 661465000000000308, David K. Levine.
    18. Magdalena Olczyk, 2016. "International Competitiveness in the Economics Literature: A Bibliometric Study," Athens Journal of Business & Economics, Athens Institute for Education and Research (ATINER), vol. 2(4), pages 375-388, October.
    19. Dijk van, M., 2003. "Industry Evolution in Developing Countries: the Indonesian Pulp and Paper Industry," Working Papers 03.02, Eindhoven Center for Innovation Studies.
    20. Sears, Joshua B., 2019. "A real options model of market entry: Endogenous uncertainty and exogenous uncertainty," Journal of International Management, Elsevier, vol. 25(3), pages 1-1.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    competition; innovation; invention; performance; creative value;

    JEL classification:

    • D42 - Microeconomics - - Market Structure, Pricing, and Design - - - Monopoly

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ora:journl:v:1:y:2019:i:2:p:385-394. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catalin ZMOLE (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/feoraro.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.