IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ora/journl/v1y2017i1p181-191.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Empirical Research Regarding The Factors That Influence Foreign Participation In The Share Capital Of Romanian Companies

Author

Listed:
  • Mariana SEHLEANU

    (Universitatea din Oradea)

Abstract

Foreign investment represents an important variable of economic development at global level. According to Romanian National Trade Register Office statistics (ONRC, 2017), the value of subscribed capital (initial registration) in companies with foreign participation in Romania had an oscillatory evolution during 1991 and 2016. It recorded relative small values during 90’s and increased slowly from 2001, reaching a peak in 2008 when the value of subscribed capital was 5924,8 million USD. Economic and financial conditions at the global level were reflected in a decrease of the value of subscribed capital due to the lack of financing and restricted access to credit and lack of liquidity. The lowest value recorded from 2001 until present was registered in 2015, i.e. 1428,5 million USD. In terms of number of companies with foreign participation registered, there was an increase from 5.499 in 1991 to 15.720 in 2007, when the highest number was recorded. From 2008 until present, the number of companies with foreign participation registered annually decreased and reached 5.348 in 2016, which represented a level below that of 1991. However, in recent years the mean value of subscriptions has increased compared to the one specific to the period between 1991 and 2004.The aim of this research is to analyze the influence of several factors on the value of subscribed capital in companies with foreign participation in the share capital in Romania, between 1991 and 2015. Using simple regression models, the study reveals that factors such as gross domestic product (GDP), research & development expenditure, exchange rate, labour cost and infrastructure have an important role in explaining the value of subscribed capital in companies with foreign participation in Romania, trade openness has a moderate influence on the value of subscribed capital, while the number of graduates has a weak influence. Between the value of subscribed capital in companies with foreign participation in Romania and research&development, trade openness, infrastructure, GDP, exchange rate, respectively graduates, there is a direct and linear correlation and between the value of subscribed capital (initial registration) and labour cost there is an inverse linear correlation.

Suggested Citation

  • Mariana SEHLEANU, 2017. "Empirical Research Regarding The Factors That Influence Foreign Participation In The Share Capital Of Romanian Companies," Annals of Faculty of Economics, University of Oradea, Faculty of Economics, vol. 1(1), pages 181-191, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:ora:journl:v:1:y:2017:i:1:p:181-191
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://anale.steconomiceuoradea.ro/volume/2017/n1/17.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hubert Janicki & Phanindra Wunnava, 2004. "Determinants of foreign direct investment: empirical evidence from EU accession candidates," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 36(5), pages 505-509.
    2. Lansbury, Melanie & Pain, Nigel & Smidkova, Katerina, 1996. "Foreign Direct Investment in Central Europe Since 1990: An Econometric Study," National Institute Economic Review, National Institute of Economic and Social Research, vol. 156, pages 104-114, May.
    3. D Sethi & S E Guisinger & S E Phelan & D M Berg, 2003. "Trends in foreign direct investment flows: a theoretical and empirical analysis," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 34(4), pages 315-326, July.
    4. Oziengbe Scott Aigheyisi, 2016. "Does Stock Market Development Play Any Role In The Effect Of Fdi On Economic Growth In Nigeria? An Empirical Investigation," Oradea Journal of Business and Economics, University of Oradea, Faculty of Economics, vol. 1(2), pages 51-61, September.
    5. GOSCHIN Zizi & DANCIU Aniela-Raluca & SERBU Razvan Rares Sorin, 2013. "Understanding The Regional Determinants Of The Fdi In Romania: Evidence From A Panel Data Model," Revista Economica, Lucian Blaga University of Sibiu, Faculty of Economic Sciences, vol. 65(5), pages 207-222.
    6. Ang, James B., 2008. "Determinants of foreign direct investment in Malaysia," Journal of Policy Modeling, Elsevier, vol. 30(1), pages 185-189.
    7. Bevan, Alan A. & Estrin, Saul, 2004. "The determinants of foreign direct investment into European transition economies," Journal of Comparative Economics, Elsevier, vol. 32(4), pages 775-787, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Masahiro Tokunaga & Ichiro Iwasaki, 2017. "The Determinants of Foreign Direct Investment in Transition Economies: A Meta-analysis," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 40(12), pages 2771-2831, December.
    2. Dimitra Mitsi & Constantina Kottaridi, 2022. "Fiscal and non-fiscal institutional context effects and foreign direct investment: empirical evidence in developing countries," SPOUDAI Journal of Economics and Business, SPOUDAI Journal of Economics and Business, University of Piraeus, vol. 72(1-2), pages 11-33, January-J.
    3. Riedl, Aleksandra, 2008. "Contrasting the dynamic patterns of manufacturing and service FDI: Evidence from transition economies," Department of Economics Working Paper Series 117, WU Vienna University of Economics and Business.
    4. Sirin, Selahattin Murat, 2017. "Foreign direct investments (FDIs) in Turkish power sector: A discussion on investments, opportunities and risks," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 1367-1377.
    5. Tokunaga, Masahiro & Iwasaki, Ichiro, 2014. "Transition and FDI: A Meta-Analysis of the FDI Determinants in Transition Economies," RRC Working Paper Series 47, Russian Research Center, Institute of Economic Research, Hitotsubashi University.
    6. Bitzenis, Aristidis & Tsitouras, Antonis & Vlachos, Vasileios A., 2009. "Decisive FDI obstacles as an explanatory reason for limited FDI inflows in an EMU member state: The case of Greece," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 38(4), pages 691-704, August.
    7. Bailey, Nicholas, 2018. "Exploring the relationship between institutional factors and FDI attractiveness: A meta-analytic review," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 27(1), pages 139-148.
    8. Jun, Jong-Kun & Hyun, Jae Hoon, 2014. "Anticipation or risk aversion? The effects of the EU enlargement on Korean trade and FDI activities in Central and Eastern Europe," Journal of East European Management Studies, Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG, vol. 19(4), pages 486-503.
    9. Bellak, Christian & Leibrecht, Markus & Riedl, Aleksandra, 2008. "Labour costs and FDI flows into Central and Eastern European Countries: A survey of the literature and empirical evidence," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 19(1), pages 17-37, March.
    10. Aneta Bobenič Hintošová & František Sudzina & Terézia Barlašová, 2021. "Direct and Indirect Effects of Investment Incentives in Slovakia," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 14(2), pages 1-12, February.
    11. Saul Estrin, 2017. "Foreign direct investment and employment in transition economies," IZA World of Labor, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA), pages 330-330, January.
    12. Kaminski, Bartlomiej, 2006. "Bulgaria's institutions and policies : integrating into Pan-European markets," Policy Research Working Paper Series 3864, The World Bank.
    13. Janna Mai Nguyen & Dodo zu Knyphausen‐Aufseß, 2016. "The Role of Sovereign Ratings in M&A Markets: Empirical Evidence from Latin America and South East Asia," Financial Markets, Institutions & Instruments, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 25(1), pages 5-48, January.
    14. Eric Evans Osei Opoku & Alex O. Acheampong & Janet Dzator & Nana Kwabena Kufuor, 2022. "Does environmental sustainability attract foreign investment? Evidence from developing countries," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(7), pages 3542-3573, November.
    15. Andrzej Cieślik, 2020. "What attracts multinational enterprises from the new EU member states to Poland?," Eurasian Business Review, Springer;Eurasia Business and Economics Society, vol. 10(2), pages 253-269, June.
    16. Burcak Polat, 2015. "Determinants of FDI into Central and Eastern European Countries: Pull or Push Effect?," Eurasian Journal of Economics and Finance, Eurasian Publications, vol. 3(4), pages 39-47.
    17. Miroslav Mateev & Iliya Tsekov, 2014. "Are there any top FDI performers among EU-15 and CEE countries? A comparative panel data analysis," Financial Theory and Practice, Institute of Public Finance, vol. 38(3), pages 337-374.
    18. Patrycja Chodnicka & Renata Karkowska & Malgorzata Olszak (ed.), 2014. "Towards contemporary issues in the financial system," Book, University of Warsaw, Faculty of Management, number 07, June.
    19. Andrew G Ross & Maktoba Omar & Anqi Xu & Samikshya Pandey, 2019. "The impact of institutional quality on Chinese foreign direct investment in Africa," Local Economy, London South Bank University, vol. 34(6), pages 572-588, September.
    20. Fotini Economou & Christis Hassapis & Nikolaos Philippas & Mike Tsionas, 2017. "Foreign Direct Investment Determinants in OECD and Developing Countries," Review of Development Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 21(3), pages 527-542, August.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    foreign subscribed capital; companies; Romania.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • F21 - International Economics - - International Factor Movements and International Business - - - International Investment; Long-Term Capital Movements

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ora:journl:v:1:y:2017:i:1:p:181-191. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catalin ZMOLE (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/feoraro.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.