IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ora/journl/v1y2014i1p1125-1134.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An Exploratory Approach To Integration Of Business Practices In Supply Chain Management

Author

Listed:
  • Constangioara Alexandru

    (Universitatea din Oradea,)

Abstract

Literature on supply chain management focuses increasingly on the topic of supply chain integration. Morash and Bowersox (1989) show that integration links relationships, activities, functions, processes and locations. Integration links a firm with its customers, suppliers and other channel members. The empirical research brings supporting evidence on the theory that organizations achieve the desired competitive advantage only by focusing on one strategy - either collaborative closeness or operational excellence. Wang, Tai and Wei (2006) have developed a virtual integration theory in supply chains. According to them supply chain integration makes the chain agile, allowing a flexible and timely response to disturbances in the environment. Integration, show the above mentioned authors, involves (a) collaborative operation execution, (b) collaborative process planning & control and (c) supplier responsiveness. Collaborative operation execution and planning & control are operationalized through modern IT solutions linking partners throughout the supply chain. Supplier responsiveness reflects the extent to which a supplier meets customer requirements. Evidence shows that the greater the environmental volatility, the greater will be the extent of virtual integration in a supply chain. In the process of creating new value for consumers, the overall output in the supply chain is maximized through collaboration among supply chain members and integration of the key business processes. After reviewing the literature on supply chain integration, present paper proposes an exploratory analysis of the measurement model corresponding to logistics integration. A Romanian dataset of 21 firms from various industries, covering all levels of a supply chain, from production to commerce is used to conduct a principal factor analysis to test for (a) content validity, (b) substantive validity, (c) uni-dimensionality and (d) reliability of scales used to measure integration in supply chains. Also the principal component analysis is used to forecast both dependent and independent variables subsequently used in an OLS estimation of the relationship between supply chain integration and performances in Romanian supply chains. Results support the conclusion that Romanian supply chains focus on a strategy of operational excellence.

Suggested Citation

  • Constangioara Alexandru, 2014. "An Exploratory Approach To Integration Of Business Practices In Supply Chain Management," Annals of Faculty of Economics, University of Oradea, Faculty of Economics, vol. 1(1), pages 1125-1134, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:ora:journl:v:1:y:2014:i:1:p:1125-1134
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://anale.steconomiceuoradea.ro/volume/2014/n1/124.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Yossi Aviv, 2001. "The Effect of Collaborative Forecasting on Supply Chain Performance," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 47(10), pages 1326-1343, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Fildes, Robert & Goodwin, Paul & Onkal, Dilek, 2015. "Information use in supply chain forecasting," MPRA Paper 66034, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    2. Karimi, Majid & Zaerpour, Nima, 2022. "Put your money where your forecast is: Supply chain collaborative forecasting with cost-function-based prediction markets," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 300(3), pages 1035-1049.
    3. Li Chen & Hau L. Lee, 2012. "Bullwhip Effect Measurement and Its Implications," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 60(4), pages 771-784, August.
    4. Kamath, Narasimha B. & Roy, Rahul, 2007. "Capacity augmentation of a supply chain for a short lifecycle product: A system dynamics framework," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 179(2), pages 334-351, June.
    5. Fildes, Robert & Goodwin, Paul & Lawrence, Michael & Nikolopoulos, Konstantinos, 2009. "Effective forecasting and judgmental adjustments: an empirical evaluation and strategies for improvement in supply-chain planning," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 25(1), pages 3-23.
    6. Zhang, Xiaolong & Burke, Gerard J., 2011. "Analysis of compound bullwhip effect causes," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 210(3), pages 514-526, May.
    7. Hyoduk Shin & Tunay I. Tunca, 2010. "Do Firms Invest in Forecasting Efficiently? The Effect of Competition on Demand Forecast Investments and Supply Chain Coordination," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 58(6), pages 1592-1610, December.
    8. Kaijie Zhu & Ulrich W. Thonemann, 2004. "Modeling the Benefits of Sharing Future Demand Information," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 52(1), pages 136-147, February.
    9. Özalp Özer & Yanchong Zheng & Kay-Yut Chen, 2011. "Trust in Forecast Information Sharing," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 57(6), pages 1111-1137, June.
    10. Yue, Xiaohang & Liu, John, 2006. "Demand forecast sharing in a dual-channel supply chain," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 174(1), pages 646-667, October.
    11. Vladimir Kovtun & Avi Giloni & Clifford Hurvich, 2014. "Assessing the value of demand sharing in supply chains," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 61(7), pages 515-531, October.
    12. Mirko Kremer & Enno Siemsen & Douglas J. Thomas, 2016. "The Sum and Its Parts: Judgmental Hierarchical Forecasting," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 62(9), pages 2745-2764, September.
    13. Yossi Aviv, 2003. "A Time-Series Framework for Supply-Chain Inventory Management," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 51(2), pages 210-227, April.
    14. Graça, Paula & Camarinha-Matos, Luís M., 2017. "Performance indicators for collaborative business ecosystems — Literature review and trends," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 116(C), pages 237-255.
    15. Bin Shen & Hau-Ling Chan, 2017. "Forecast Information Sharing for Managing Supply Chains in the Big Data Era: Recent Development and Future Research," Asia-Pacific Journal of Operational Research (APJOR), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 34(01), pages 1-26, February.
    16. Tong Wang & Atalay Atasu & Mümin Kurtuluş, 2012. "A Multiordering Newsvendor Model with Dynamic Forecast Evolution," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 14(3), pages 472-484, July.
    17. Eroglu, Cuneyt & Hofer, Christian & Hofer, Adriana Rossiter & Hou, Young, 2023. "“Cultural inventories”: How dimensions of national culture moderate the effect of demand unpredictability on firm-level inventories," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 264(C).
    18. Xu, Xiaoyan & Choi, Tsan-Ming & Chung, Sai-Ho & Guo, Shu, 2023. "Collaborative-commerce in supply chains: A review and classification of analytical models," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 263(C).
    19. R Fildes & K Nikolopoulos & S F Crone & A A Syntetos, 2008. "Forecasting and operational research: a review," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 59(9), pages 1150-1172, September.
    20. Gunasekaran, Angappa & Ngai, Eric W.T., 2009. "Modeling and analysis of build-to-order supply chains," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 195(2), pages 319-334, June.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    supply chain management; supply chain integration; performances; exploratory analysis;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • M10 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Administration - - - General
    • C54 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric Modeling - - - Quantitative Policy Modeling

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ora:journl:v:1:y:2014:i:1:p:1125-1134. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catalin ZMOLE (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/feoraro.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.