IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ora/journl/v1y2013i2p595-604.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Stakeholders, The Determinant Factors In Development And Operationalization Of E-Governance In Romania

Author

Listed:
  • NEAMTU FLORENTINA

    (Universitatea Transilvania din Brasov, AFER)

Abstract

With the development of information society, the introduction of information and communication technology raises new challenges for public administration efficiency while providing the opportunity and the coordinates for developing activities closer to the citizen; in this context, increasing administrative capacity improves the ability for Romania to defend its interests at European and international level. Electronic government or e-Government becomes more and more a major feature of the new information and knowledge-based society. The phenomenon is complex and refers to the many connections that exist between authorities, individuals and organizations present in a society. E-Government is the use of information technology applications by central government authorities with the following objectives: improving access to information and public services of central public administration authorities, removing red tape and simplify working methodologies, improving information and services exchange between central and local authorities, improving the quality of public services to the central government. The basis for the development of this concept was the need felt by the government to provide to citizens and organizational and social entities quality services, providing time and place utility, creating added value for all stakeholders. The arguments supporting this process of modernization of public services consist in improving public services, public confidence and democratization of society as a whole. This paper captures, in theory, structural elements of e-government platforms in Romania, focusing on stakeholder theory - taken from the sphere of private organizations and adapted to public domain - as a prerequisite to rethink governance. Thus, were analyzed the system coordinates of the relationships between public system and stakeholders and the benefits emerging from rethinking their alignment with EU policy context.

Suggested Citation

  • Neamtu Florentina, 2013. "Stakeholders, The Determinant Factors In Development And Operationalization Of E-Governance In Romania," Annals of Faculty of Economics, University of Oradea, Faculty of Economics, vol. 1(2), pages 595-604, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:ora:journl:v:1:y:2013:i:2:p:595-604
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://anale.steconomiceuoradea.ro/volume/2013/n2/058.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Reed, Darryl, 1999. "Stakeholder Management Theory: A Critical Theory Perspective," Business Ethics Quarterly, Cambridge University Press, vol. 9(3), pages 453-483, July.
    2. Phillips, Robert A., 1997. "Stakeholder Theory and A Principle of Fairness," Business Ethics Quarterly, Cambridge University Press, vol. 7(1), pages 51-66, January.
    3. Etzioni, Amitai, 1998. "A Communitarian Note on Stakeholder Theory 1," Business Ethics Quarterly, Cambridge University Press, vol. 8(4), pages 679-691, October.
    4. Marens, Richard & Wicks, Andrew, 1999. "Getting Real: Stakeholder Theory, Managerial Practice, and the General Irrelevance of Fiduciary Duties Owed to Shareholders," Business Ethics Quarterly, Cambridge University Press, vol. 9(2), pages 273-293, April.
    5. Mihaela PACESILA & Sofia Elena COLESCA, 2007. "ORASELE INTELIGENTE:pERSPECTIVA DE ANSAMBLU SI IMPLICATII POLITICE," Theoretical and Empirical Researches in Urban Management, Research Centre in Public Administration and Public Services, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 2(5), pages 12-23, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Liliana Hawrysz, 2020. "Strategic Orientation and Effects of E-Administration: Findings from the Miles and Snow Framework," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-19, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Samantha Miles, 2012. "Stakeholder: Essentially Contested or Just Confused?," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 108(3), pages 285-298, July.
    2. Allen Kaufman & Ernie Englander, 2011. "Behavioral Economics, Federalism, and the Triumph of Stakeholder Theory," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 102(3), pages 421-438, September.
    3. Cedric Dawkins, 2014. "The Principle of Good Faith: Toward Substantive Stakeholder Engagement," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 121(2), pages 283-295, May.
    4. Michel Renault & Yvan Renou, 2007. "Processus d'individuation, éthique et pragmatisme. A la recherche de fondements théoriques pour appréhender la firme partenariale," Post-Print halshs-00202148, HAL.
    5. Silke Machold & Pervaiz Ahmed & Stuart Farquhar, 2008. "Corporate Governance and Ethics: A Feminist Perspective," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 81(3), pages 665-678, September.
    6. David Weitzner & Yuval Deutsch, 2023. "Harm Reduction, Solidarity, and Social Mobility as Target Functions: A Rortian Approach to Stakeholder Theory," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 186(3), pages 479-492, September.
    7. Silvia Biraghi & Rossella Gambetti & Stefania Romenti, 2017. "Stakeholder Engagement beyond the Tension between Idealism and Practical Concerns," International Journal of Business and Management, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 12(2), pages 1-14, January.
    8. Lauren Purnell & R. Freeman, 2012. "Stakeholder Theory, Fact/Value Dichotomy, and the Normative Core: How Wall Street Stops the Ethics Conversation," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 109(1), pages 109-116, August.
    9. Robert E. Till & Mary Beth Yount, 2019. "Governance and Incentives: Is It Really All about the Money?," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 159(3), pages 605-618, October.
    10. Fracarolli Nunes, Mauro & Lee Park, Camila & Shin, Hyunju, 2021. "Corporate social and environmental irresponsibilities in supply chains, contamination, and damage of intangible resources: A behavioural approach," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 241(C).
    11. Martinez, Richard J. & Norman, Patricia M., 2004. "Whither reputation? The effects of different stakeholders," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 47(5), pages 25-32.
    12. Federica Alberti & Werner Güth & Kei Tsutsui, 2023. "Experimental Effects of Institutionalizing Co-determination by a Procedurally Fair Bidding Rule," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 184(2), pages 445-458, May.
    13. Jill Brown & William Forster, 2013. "CSR and Stakeholder Theory: A Tale of Adam Smith," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 112(2), pages 301-312, January.
    14. Samuel Mercier, 2000. "La formalisation de l'éthique:un outil stratégique pertinent pour l'entreprise," Revue Finance Contrôle Stratégie, revues.org, vol. 3(3), pages 101-123, September.
    15. Samantha Miles, 2017. "Stakeholder Theory Classification: A Theoretical and Empirical Evaluation of Definitions," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 142(3), pages 437-459, May.
    16. Eleanor O’Higgins, 2010. "Corporations, Civil Society, and Stakeholders: An Organizational Conceptualization," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 94(2), pages 157-176, June.
    17. Boeddeling, Jann, 2011. "Corporate Social Responsibility: Fundamentalstellung für Kapitalismus und Wirtschaftssoziologie," Wittener Diskussionspapiere zu alten und neuen Fragen der Wirtschaftswissenschaft 17/2011, Witten/Herdecke University, Faculty of Management and Economics.
    18. Bidhan L. Parmar & Adrian Keevil & Andrew C. Wicks, 2019. "People and Profits: The Impact of Corporate Objectives on Employees’ Need Satisfaction at Work," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 154(1), pages 13-33, January.
    19. Giacomo Manetti & Simone Toccafondi, 2013. "Il coinvolgimento degli stakeholder nella governance e nel reporting delle fondazioni bancarie," MANAGEMENT CONTROL, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2013(3), pages 51-76.
    20. Dominik van Aaken & Violetta Splitter & David Seidl, 2012. "Why Do Corporate Actors Engage in Pro-Social Behavior? A Bourdieusian Perspective on Corporate Social Responsibility," Working Papers 319, University of Zurich, Department of Business Administration (IBW).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    e-guvernare; e-administratie; stakeholder; orase inteligente; cetateni;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • M31 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Marketing and Advertising - - - Marketing

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ora:journl:v:1:y:2013:i:2:p:595-604. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catalin ZMOLE (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/feoraro.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.