IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/onl/cjoaac/v7y2022i2p112-121id729.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Screening of Fungicides and Botanicals for Controlling False Smut of Rice

Author

Listed:
  • Sumon MMP
  • Islam MS
  • Billah KMM
  • Islam SMA
  • Jahan MN

Abstract

The present investigation was conducted in the field laboratory of the Department of Plant Pathology, Patuakhali Science and Technology University during August 2017 to December 2017 to evaluate the efficacy of botanicals viz., neem leaf extract, garlic clove extract, tulshi leaf extract and zinger rhizome extract at 10% concentration and fungicides viz., TALL 25EC, RAI 32.5 SC, TOWIN 50 WP, Syconazole 25SC and Y-Thane M-45 at 0.2% concentration to control rice false smut disease. The experiment was set up in a Randomized Complete Block Design (RCBD) with 3 replications. Among the treatments RAI 32.5 SC= Suspension concentrate and tulsi leaf extract performed better in respect of percent hill infection and it was 0.51%, 1.03%, 1.28% and 1.79% respectively at 85, 95, 105 and 115 days after transplanting (DAT). Result showed that the lowest percent plant and panicle infection at different days after transplanting were highest in the plot treated with RAI 32.5 SC followed by garlic extract. RAI 32.5 SC showed minimum percent infected grains which were 0.26%, 1.03% and 1.17% at 85, 105 and 115 DAT respectively and maximum 1.22%, 2.39% and 2.99% respectively, in the control plot at 85, 105, and 115 DAT. The highest thousand grain weight (114.6) and yield (4.790) were obtained in RAI 32.5 SC and the lowest thousand grain weight (108.3) and yield (3.587) harvested from the control plot.

Suggested Citation

  • Sumon MMP & Islam MS & Billah KMM & Islam SMA & Jahan MN, 2022. "Screening of Fungicides and Botanicals for Controlling False Smut of Rice," Canadian Journal of Agriculture and Crops, Online Science Publishing, vol. 7(2), pages 112-121.
  • Handle: RePEc:onl:cjoaac:v:7:y:2022:i:2:p:112-121:id:729
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://onlinesciencepublishing.com/index.php/cjac/article/view/729/1467
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: http://onlinesciencepublishing.com/index.php/cjac/article/view/729/1493
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:onl:cjoaac:v:7:y:2022:i:2:p:112-121:id:729. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Pacharapa Naka (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.onlinesciencepublishing.com/index.php/cjac/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.