IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nse/ecosta/ecostat_2023_539_5.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comment – Telework and Productivity Three Years After the Start of the Pandemic

Author

Listed:
  • Pierre Pora

Abstract

[eng] Since March 2020, the COVID‑19 pandemic has caused many companies and employees to turn to telework. The articles by Bergeaud et al. (2023) and Criscuolo et al. (2023) document the effects of telework on productivity in detail and, more broadly, its effects on the behaviour of companies and employees, both before and during the health crisis. This commentary discusses their findings in terms of the uncertain knowledge that was available on the effects of telework before the health crisis, as well as the technical and conceptual difficulties raised by estimating the consequences of telework. Finally, it examines the apparent paradox whereby, despite its positive effects on both the productive efficiency of companies and the working conditions of employees, teleworking remained rare prior to 2020.

Suggested Citation

  • Pierre Pora, 2023. "Comment – Telework and Productivity Three Years After the Start of the Pandemic," Economie et Statistique / Economics and Statistics, Institut National de la Statistique et des Etudes Economiques (INSEE), issue 539, pages 91-96.
  • Handle: RePEc:nse:ecosta:ecostat_2023_539_5
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.24187/ecostat.2023.539.2099
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://WWW.insee.fr/en/statistiques/fichier/7647331/05_ES539_Pora_EN.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/https://doi.org/10.24187/ecostat.2023.539.2099?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Aghion, Philippe & Howitt, Peter, 1992. "A Model of Growth through Creative Destruction," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 60(2), pages 323-351, March.
    2. Antonin Bergeaud & Gilbert Cette & Simon Drapala, 2023. "Telework and Productivity Before, During and After the COVID‑19 Crisis," Economie et Statistique / Economics and Statistics, Institut National de la Statistique et des Etudes Economiques (INSEE), issue 539, pages 73-89.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Funke, Michael & Strulik, Holger, 2000. "On endogenous growth with physical capital, human capital and product variety," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 44(3), pages 491-515, March.
    2. Ewens, Michael & Nanda, Ramana & Rhodes-Kropf, Matthew, 2018. "Cost of experimentation and the evolution of venture capital," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 128(3), pages 422-442.
    3. Straathof, Bas & Zon, Adriaan van, 2002. "Research in energy conversion technologies: Policy instruments and uncertainty," Research Memorandum 005, Maastricht University, Maastricht Economic Research Institute on Innovation and Technology (MERIT).
    4. Ma, Qiang & Murshed, Muntasir & Khan, Zeeshan, 2021. "The nexuses between energy investments, technological innovations, emission taxes, and carbon emissions in China," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 155(C).
    5. Barry B Hughes & Kanishka Narayan, 2021. "Enhancing integrated analysis of national and global goal pursuit by endogenizing economic productivity," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(2), pages 1-24, February.
    6. Aghion, Philippe & Akcigit, Ufuk & Cagé, Julia & Kerr, William R., 2016. "Taxation, corruption, and growth," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 24-51.
    7. Garga, Vaishali & Singh, Sanjay R., 2021. "Output hysteresis and optimal monetary policy," Journal of Monetary Economics, Elsevier, vol. 117(C), pages 871-886.
    8. Gerlagh, Reyer, 2007. "Measuring the value of induced technological change," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 35(11), pages 5287-5297, November.
    9. Haytem Ahmed Troug & Rashid Sbia, 2015. "Testing for the Presence of Asymmetric Information in the Oil Market: A Vector Autoregression Approach," International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, Econjournals, vol. 5(3), pages 753-762.
    10. Antonio Cubel & Vicente Esteve & Juan Sanchis & María Teresa Sanchis, 2011. "Innovación y crecimiento de la productividad en España durante la segunda mitad del siglo XX," Working Papers 1118, Department of Applied Economics II, Universidad de Valencia.
    11. Gray, Elie & Grimaud, André, 2014. "The Lindahl equilibrium in Schumpeterian growth models: Knowledge diffusion, social value of innovations and optimal R&D incentives," IDEI Working Papers 821, Institut d'Économie Industrielle (IDEI), Toulouse.
    12. Philippe Aghion & Antonin Bergeaud & Timo Boppart & Peter J. Klenow & Huiyu Li, 2019. "Missing Growth from Creative Destruction," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 109(8), pages 2795-2822, August.
    13. Abida Hafeez & Karim Bux Shah Syed & Fiza Qureshi, 2019. "Exploring the Relationship between Government R & D Expenditures and Economic Growth in a Global Perspective: A PMG Estimation Approach," International Business Research, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 12(4), pages 163-174, April.
    14. Nela Vlahinic-Dizdarevic & Sasa Zikovic, 2010. "The role of energy in economic growth: the case of Croatia," Zbornik radova Ekonomskog fakulteta u Rijeci/Proceedings of Rijeka Faculty of Economics, University of Rijeka, Faculty of Economics and Business, vol. 28(1), pages 35-60.
    15. Xu, Cheng-Gang & Tong, Jian, 2004. "Financial Institutions and the Wealth of Nations: Tales of Development," CEPR Discussion Papers 4348, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    16. Lin, Xiaoji, 2012. "Endogenous technological progress and the cross-section of stock returns," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 103(2), pages 411-427.
    17. Magnus Henrekson & Dan Johansson & Johan Karlsson, 2024. "To Be or Not to Be: The Entrepreneur in Neo-Schumpeterian Growth Theory," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 48(1), pages 104-140, January.
    18. Nihal Bayraktar & Yan Wang, 2008. "Banking Sector Openness and Economic Growth," Margin: The Journal of Applied Economic Research, National Council of Applied Economic Research, vol. 2(2), pages 145-175, June.
    19. Erica Perego & Lionel Fontagné & Gianluca Santoni, 2022. "MaGE 3.1: Long-term macroeconomic projections of the World economy," International Economics, CEPII research center, issue 172, pages 168-189.
    20. Sefa Awaworyi Churchill & Mehmet Ugur & Siew Ling Yew, 2017. "Does Government Size Affect Per-Capita Income Growth? A Hierarchical Meta-Regression Analysis," The Economic Record, The Economic Society of Australia, vol. 93(300), pages 142-171, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nse:ecosta:ecostat_2023_539_5. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Veronique Egloff (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inseefr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.