IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/now/jnlcfr/104.00000096.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Treasury Rates No Longer Predict Returns: A Reappraisal of Breen, Glosten and Jagannathan (1989)

Author

Listed:
  • Philip Gray
  • Thanh Huynh

Abstract

Breen et al. (1989) show that the negative relation between excess stock returns and Treasury bill rates is economically important. From 1954 to 1986, the predictive ability of interest rates facilitated a trading strategy that generated average returns at least on par with a buy-and-hold market investment but with significantly lower risk. The services of a portfolio manager using this predictive model to invest justified a management fee of nearly 2% per annum. Using currently-available data, we can nearly perfectly replicate Breen et al.’s (1989) key findings in sample. However, the success of Treasury bill rates as a predictor of equity returns appears to be specific to the time period studied. When the same methodology is applied out of sample from 1987 to 2018, there is little statistical or economic evidence of predictability. Additional out-of-sample analysis of G20 countries shows only sporadic support for the notion that interest rates predict equity returns.

Suggested Citation

  • Philip Gray & Thanh Huynh, 2021. "Treasury Rates No Longer Predict Returns: A Reappraisal of Breen, Glosten and Jagannathan (1989)," Critical Finance Review, now publishers, vol. 10(3), pages 429-444, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:now:jnlcfr:104.00000096
    DOI: 10.1561/104.00000096
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1561/104.00000096
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1561/104.00000096?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Nusret Cakici & Christian Fieberg & Daniel Metko & Adam Zaremba, 2024. "Do Anomalies Really Predict Market Returns? New Data and New Evidence," Review of Finance, European Finance Association, vol. 28(1), pages 1-44.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Return predictability; Treasury bill rates; Trading strategy; Out-of-sample forecasts;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • G11 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - Portfolio Choice; Investment Decisions
    • G12 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - Asset Pricing; Trading Volume; Bond Interest Rates
    • G14 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - Information and Market Efficiency; Event Studies; Insider Trading

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:now:jnlcfr:104.00000096. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Lucy Wiseman (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nowpublishers.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.