IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nos/voprob/2013i1p301-305.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Guide for Authors Publishing Results of Assessment Tool Development

Author

Listed:

Abstract

Yuliya Tyumeneva, Psy.D., senior researcher at the Center for Monitoring Educational Quality, National Research University - Higher School of Economics, Moscow, Russian Federation. Email: jutu@yandex.ru Anisya Yaremenko, M.A. in Psychology, intern researcher at the International Laboratory for Education Policy Analysis, Graduate School of Education, National Research University - Higher School of Economics, Moscow, Russian Federation. Email: anisia89@gmail.com The paper specifies requirements of The Journal of Educational Studies to publications on results of development of an assessment tool. The term tool is used here as a of widespread standardized assessment procedures, such as tests, questionnaires, scales, algorithms, etc.The Guide has been developed in compliance with American Psychological association, American Educational Research Association, and National Council on Measurement in Education standards.Articles on results of assessment tool development should contain the following indispensable information: theoretical grounds for the developed tool; existing assessment tools for the same or similar construct and advantages of the developed tools before them; description of the developed tool; the method of ensuring assessment tool reliability and validity; analysis results. Description of the tool should always include structure of the tool, and scoring. Description of the method of verifying assessment tool reliability and validity should always include: procedure and participants; tools applied for analysis; analysis strategy. Description of results of verifying assessment tool reliability and validity should always include: scoring reliability; validity; standard range, if any. Description of each structural element is supported by relevant examples in the Guide. Additional recommendations are given on how to describe the research procedure with due account for possible specific factors.The Guide will allow authors to identify and fill any possible gaps in their research.

Suggested Citation

  • Yulia Tyumeneva & Anisya Yaremenko, 2013. "Guide for Authors Publishing Results of Assessment Tool Development," Voprosy obrazovaniya / Educational Studies Moscow, National Research University Higher School of Economics, issue 1, pages 301-305.
    • Handle: RePEc:nos:voprob:2013:i:1:p:301-305
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://vo.hse.ru/data/2021/04/08/1391820112/%D0%A2%D1%8E%D0%BC%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%B5%D0%B2%D0%B0,%20%D0%AF%D1%80%D0%B5%D0%BC%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%BA%D0%BE.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nos:voprob:2013:i:1:p:301-305. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Marta Morozova (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://vo.hse.ru/en/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.