IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nos/vgmu00/2018i2p94-113.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

On the Effectiveness of Electronic Platforms of Citizen Participation in Public Administration

Author

Listed:
  • Sergey Revyakin

Abstract

Information and communication technologies have been increasingly used to involve citizens in the government decision-making process. Given high costs associated with the development and maintenance of the electronic platforms, the eff ectiveness of such projects has not been frequently assessed. The article discusses theoretical approaches to evaluating the effectiveness of e-participation projects, suggests criteria and methodology for conducting such evaluations, and provides the results of Activniy grazhdanin [Active Citizen] platform evaluation based on the analysis of the reports published in 2014-2016. On the one hand the study attempts to respond to the public administration changes in Russia where the number of electronic platforms (and costs respectively) is increasing given the insufficient public importance of the topics under discussion (according to public interests). On the other hand, the study aims to develop a methodology for evaluating the effectiveness of the new form of public participation projects. The article concludes that in order for e-platforms to be an effective tool for government decision-making process the platforms not only have to consider advanced technical parameters and high level of public involvement, but also sufficient public interest of the topics under discussion. Perhaps, at a minimum, consideration of these three factors is required to ensure e-platforms effectiveness. This conclusion may provide the basis for developing an evaluation methodology applicable by the government. In this way the present research provides basis for local governments benchmarking, since there is no similar study concerning Russia.

Suggested Citation

  • Sergey Revyakin, 2018. "On the Effectiveness of Electronic Platforms of Citizen Participation in Public Administration," Public administration issues, Higher School of Economics, issue 2, pages 94-113.
  • Handle: RePEc:nos:vgmu00:2018:i:2:p:94-113
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://vgmu.hse.ru/data/2018/07/04/1152927525/%D0%A0%D0%B5%D0%B2%D1%8F%D0%BA%D0%B8%D0%BD%202-2018.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Herbert Kubicek & Georg Aichholzer, 2016. "Closing the Evaluation Gap in e-Participation Research and Practice," Public Administration and Information Technology, in: Georg Aichholzer & Herbert Kubicek & Lourdes Torres (ed.), Evaluating e-Participation, chapter 2, pages 11-45, Springer.
    2. Greg Brown & Sean Yeong Wei Chin, 2013. "Assessing the Effectiveness of Public Participation in Neighbourhood Planning," Planning Practice & Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 28(5), pages 563-588, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ревякин С. А., 2018. "Об Эффективности Электронных Платформ Участия Граждан В Государственном Управлении," Вопросы государственного и муниципального управления // Public administration issues, НИУ ВШЭ, issue 2, pages 94-113.
    2. Kimberly Jones, 2023. "Community Engagement in Local Communities: Hearing the Voices of the Public," SPP Research Papers, The School of Public Policy, University of Calgary, vol. 16(32), October.
    3. Francis Marleau Donais & Irène Abi-Zeid & E. Owen D. Waygood & Roxane Lavoie, 2021. "A Framework for Post-Project Evaluation of Multicriteria Decision Aiding Processes from the Stakeholders’ Perspective: Design and Application," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 30(5), pages 1161-1191, October.
    4. Aubert, Alice H. & Esculier, Fabien & Lienert, Judit, 2020. "Recommendations for online elicitation of swing weights from citizens in environmental decision-making," Operations Research Perspectives, Elsevier, vol. 7(C).
    5. Sonia Royo & Vicente Pina & Jaime Garcia-Rayado, 2020. "Decide Madrid: A Critical Analysis of an Award-Winning e-Participation Initiative," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-19, February.
    6. Kantola, Sini & Fagerholm, Nora & Nikula, Ari, 2023. "Utilization and implementation of PPGIS in land use planning and decision-making from the perspective of organizations," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 127(C).
    7. Devindi Geekiyanage & Terrence Fernando & Kaushal Keraminiyage, 2021. "Mapping Participatory Methods in the Urban Development Process: A Systematic Review and Case-Based Evidence Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-28, August.
    8. Beni Rohrbach & Sharolyn Anderson & Patrick Laube, 2016. "The effects of sample size on data quality in participatory mapping of past land use," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 43(4), pages 681-697, July.
    9. Ertiö, Titiana-Petra & Bhagwatwar, Akshay, 2017. "Citizens as planners: Harnessing information and values from the bottom-up," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 37(3), pages 111-113.
    10. Cristina Ampatzidou & Katharina Gugerell & Teodora Constantinescu & Oswald Devisch & Martina Jauschneg & Martin Berger, 2018. "All Work and No Play? Facilitating Serious Games and Gamified Applications in Participatory Urban Planning and Governance," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 3(1), pages 34-46.
    11. Yanliu Lin & Stijn Kant, 2021. "Using Social Media for Citizen Participation: Contexts, Empowerment, and Inclusion," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-14, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nos:vgmu00:2018:i:2:p:94-113. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Irina A. Zvereva (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://vgmu.hse.ru/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.