IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nos/ddldem/89.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Budget expenditure management in conditions of decentralization on the example of Ukraine

Author

Listed:
  • Olena Shaporenko

    (State Educational and Scientific Institution «Academy of Financial Management», Kyiv)

Abstract

The object of this research is budget expenditures. The limited financial resources are typical for most countries of the world, therefore, it is important to find and improve the ways of forming and implementing the budgetary policy of the state at every stage of the budgetary process. The budget of any country reflects important economic and social aspects of the life of society as a whole and each person individually. Of course, the budget is a powerful regulator of the main economic processes. One of the most problematic areas is ineffective and inefficient use of budget expenditures. Therefore, this study is aimed at developing practical recommendations for optimizing the process of managing budget expenditures in the context of decentralization to ensure sustainable socio-economic development of the state. To achieve this aim, the author used the problems of managing budget expenditures on the example of Ukraine in the context of the introduction of decentralization processes in the country. The research used the methods of scientific abstraction, systems approach, grouping and classification. To determine the integrated indicator of the efficiency of budget expenditures management at the level of a budgetary institution, society, region, state, a statistical method was used that reflects the correlations of the constituent indicators. To optimize the process of managing budget expenditures, which is considered as a cycle of public policy, two main approaches are proposed. First, a change in the concept of budget expenditures management – a transition from the consumption budget to the development budget, which will allow achieving sustainable economic development in the long term. Secondly, it is proposed to introduce an assessment of the effectiveness of budget expenditure management by calculating an integrated indicator, consisting of all components that reflect the effectiveness of the budgetary policy being implemented. Thanks to the proposed methodology, it is possible to timely adjust the policy for managing budget expenditures in the event of an unsatisfactory value of the integrated indicator of the effectiveness of managing budget expenditures. This provides the advantage that such an adjustment will have a positive effect, since it will be carried out both at the level of a budgetary institution, society, region, and the state as a whole.

Suggested Citation

  • Olena Shaporenko, 2021. "Budget expenditure management in conditions of decentralization on the example of Ukraine," Technology audit and production reserves, Socionet;Technology audit and production reserves, vol. 3(4(59)), pages 41-45.
    • Handle: RePEc:nos:ddldem:89
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://journals.uran.ua/tarp/article/view/235630
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. James M. Buchanan & Richard A. Musgrave, 1999. "Public Finance and Public Choice: Two Contrasting Visions of the State," MIT Press Books, The MIT Press, edition 1, volume 1, number 0262024624, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Marek Wigier, 2015. "Results of Support for Agriculture during the CAP Implementation in Poland," Oblik i finansi, Institute of Accounting and Finance, issue 1, pages 134-144, March.
    2. Christoph March & Ina Schieferdecker, 2021. "Technological Sovereignty as Ability, Not Autarky," CESifo Working Paper Series 9139, CESifo.
    3. Christian Jaramillo, 2009. "Research and Development in Culture: A Case for Cross Subsidies in the Arts," Documentos CEDE 5346, Universidad de los Andes, Facultad de Economía, CEDE.
    4. Pierre Salmon, 2001. "Constitutional Implications of Electoral Assumptions," Constitutional Political Economy, Springer, vol. 12(4), pages 333-349, December.
    5. J. Ronnie Davis, 2020. "History of a Journal: Public Finance Quarterly to Public Finance Review," Public Finance Review, , vol. 48(3), pages 285-302, May.
    6. Jaelani, Aan, 2017. "Manajemen pengeluaran publik di Indonesia: Tinjauan ekonomi Islam pada APBN 2017 [Public expenditure management in Indonesia: Islamic economic review on state budget 2017]," MPRA Paper 77423, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 07 Mar 2017.
    7. Zan Oplotnik & Bostjan Brezovnik, 2004. "Financing local government in Slovenia," Post-Communist Economies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 16(4), pages 483-496.
    8. Hagemann, Harald, 2024. "Émigré Economists in America: Their Impact and Their Experiences," SocArXiv c5v97, Center for Open Science.
    9. Nick Cowen, 2018. "Robust Against Whom?," Advances in Austrian Economics, in: Austrian Economics: The Next Generation, volume 23, pages 91-111, Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
    10. Massimo Florio & Sara Colautti, 2005. "A logistic growth theory of public expenditures: A study of five countries over 100 years," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 122(3), pages 355-393, March.
    11. Matthew Weinzierl, 2018. "Revisiting the Classical View of Benefit‐based Taxation," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 128(612), pages 37-64, July.
    12. Maxime Desmarais-Tremblay, 2017. "Paternalism and the public household. On the domestic origins of public economics," Documents de travail du Centre d'Economie de la Sorbonne 17032, Université Panthéon-Sorbonne (Paris 1), Centre d'Economie de la Sorbonne.
    13. Bagchi, Amaresh & Chakraborty, Pinaki, 2004. "Towards a rational system of centre-state revenue transfers in India: An exploration," Working Papers 04/16, National Institute of Public Finance and Policy.
    14. Karl Case, 2008. "Musgrave’s vision of the public sector: the complex relationship between individual, society and state in public good theory," Journal of Economics and Finance, Springer;Academy of Economics and Finance, vol. 32(4), pages 348-355, October.
    15. Ortiz, Isabel, & Cummins, Matthew. & Karunanethy, Kalaivani., 2015. "Fiscal space for social protection and the SDGs options to expand social investments in 187 countries," ILO Working Papers 994877663402676, International Labour Organization.
    16. Hefeker, Carsten, 2003. "Ressourcenverteilung in der EU: Eine polit-okonomische Perspektive," Discussion Paper Series 26229, Hamburg Institute of International Economics.
    17. Gvozdeva, Margarita (Гвоздева, Маргарита) & Kazakova, M.V. (Казакова, М.В.) & Kiblitskaya, T.R. (Киблицкая, Т.Р.), 2017. "The Concept of Human Capital and its Evolution in the History of Economic Thought [Понятие Человеческого Капитала И Его Эволюция В Истории Экономической Мысли]," Working Papers 051733, Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration.
    18. -, 2020. "Panorama Fiscal de América Latina y el Caribe, 2020: la política fiscal ante la crisis derivada de la pandemia de la enfermedad por coronavirus (COVID-19)," Libros y Documentos Institucionales, Naciones Unidas Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe (CEPAL), number 45730 edited by Cepal.
    19. Allan Barton, 2009. "The Use and Abuse of Accounting in the Public Sector Financial Management Reform Program in Australia," Abacus, Accounting Foundation, University of Sydney, vol. 45(2), pages 221-248, June.
    20. Maxime Desmarais-Tremblay, 2014. "On the Definition of Public Goods. Assessing Richard A. Musgrave's contribution," Documents de travail du Centre d'Economie de la Sorbonne 14004, Université Panthéon-Sorbonne (Paris 1), Centre d'Economie de la Sorbonne.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    development expenditures; consumption expenditures; integrated indicator of the efficiency of budget expenditures management;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • H5 - Public Economics - - National Government Expenditures and Related Policies
    • H6 - Public Economics - - National Budget, Deficit, and Debt

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nos:ddldem:89. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Алина Макаренко (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://socionet.ru/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.