IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nos/ddldem/23.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Research of institutional aspects of the project financing of socio-economic development of the region

Author

Listed:
  • Kropelnytska Svitlana

    (Vasyl Stefanyk Precarpathian National University, Ivano-Frankivsk)

  • Hryhoriv Olha

    (Vasyl Stefanyk Precarpathian National University, Ivano-Frankivsk)

Abstract

The object of research is the institutional aspects of project financing of the socio-economic development of the region. One of the most problematic places is the opaque and imperfect system of applying the project approach to its financial support. The study presents a generalized and interpreted definition of project financing of the socio-economic development of the region as an innovative mechanism for financial support for the implementation of the strategic tasks of the socio-economic development of the region based on the project approach. The analysis of the problematic aspects of the institutionalization of state financial support for the development of the regions on the basis of the project approach: – funds of the State Regional Development Fund (SRDF); – subvention for the development of infrastructure of the united territorial communities (UTC); – funds of the state budget of Ukraine received from the European Union. An institutional approach has been applied to consider the mechanisms of interaction and relationships of subjects of public relations, assess their behavior in meeting the norms of distribution and use of funds for project financing. The key general and distinctive institutional aspects of project financing of socio-economic development of the regional level are identified. The main problematic aspects for improving the institutional foundations of project financing of the socio-economic development of the region are identified. It is substantiated in the work that the mismatch of projects with the objective of regional development strategies, the terms of reference for plans for their implementation, as well as lobbying for non-development projects, and «projects supporting current activities» do not contribute to the development of territories. The research results are recommended for use in practice by representatives of legislative and executive authorities making decisions on the use of project financing tools for the socio-economic development of the region. It is proposed to the expert commissions on the selection of regional development projects, the working groups on strategic planning for the development of territories to take into account the identified positive and negative factors in order to further clarify the mechanisms of state financial support for developing projects at the regional level.

Suggested Citation

  • Kropelnytska Svitlana & Hryhoriv Olha, 2020. "Research of institutional aspects of the project financing of socio-economic development of the region," Technology audit and production reserves, Socionet;Technology audit and production reserves, vol. 1(4(51)), pages 45-50.
    • Handle: RePEc:nos:ddldem:23
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://journals.uran.ua/tarp/article/view/194494
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Izabela Jelovac & Frieda Vandeninden, 2008. "How should donors give foreign aid? Project aid versus budget support," Post-Print halshs-00293130, HAL.
    2. Mr. Tito Cordella & Mr. Giovanni Dell'Ariccia, 2003. "Budget Support Versus Project Aid," IMF Working Papers 2003/088, International Monetary Fund.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kimura, Hidemi & Mori, Yuko & Sawada, Yasuyuki, 2012. "Aid Proliferation and Economic Growth: A Cross-Country Analysis," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 40(1), pages 1-10.
    2. HEPP, Ralf, 2010. "CONSEQUENCES OF DEBT RELIEF INITIATIVES IN THE 1990s," Applied Econometrics and International Development, Euro-American Association of Economic Development, vol. 10(1).
    3. Alok Kumar, 2017. "Foreign Aid, Incentives and Efficiency: Can Foreign Aid Lead to the Efficient Level of Investment?," Review of Development Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 21(3), pages 678-697, August.
    4. Carsten Hefeker, 2006. "Project Aid or Budget Aid? The Interests of Governments and Financial Institutions," Review of Development Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 10(2), pages 241-252, May.
    5. Marchesi, Silvia & Sabani, Laura, 2007. "IMF concern for reputation and conditional lending failure: Theory and empirics," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 84(2), pages 640-666, November.
    6. David Fielding & George Mavrotas, 2005. "The Volatility of Aid," WIDER Working Paper Series DP2005-06, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
    7. Tony Addison & George Mavrotas & Mark McGillivray, 2005. "Development assistance and development finance: evidence and global policy agendas," Journal of International Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 17(6), pages 819-836.
    8. Paul Clist & Alessia Isopi & Oliver Morrissey, 2012. "Selectivity on aid modality: Determinants of budget support from multilateral donors," The Review of International Organizations, Springer, vol. 7(3), pages 267-284, September.
    9. Lee, Melissa M. & Izama, Melina Platas, 2015. "Aid Externalities: Evidence from PEPFAR in Africa," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 281-294.
    10. Silvia Marchesi & Alessandro Missale, 2007. "How defensive were lending and aid to HIPC?," Working Papers 115, University of Milano-Bicocca, Department of Economics, revised 2007.
    11. Thiele, Rainer & Nunnenkamp, Peter & Dreher, Axel, 2006. "Sectoral aid priorities: Are donors really doing their best to achieve the millennium development goals?," Kiel Working Papers 1266, Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel).
    12. Dovern, Jonas & Nunnenkamp, Peter, 2006. "Aid and growth accelerations: An alternative approach to assess the effectiveness of aid," Kiel Working Papers 1296, Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel).
    13. Gunatilake, H. & Fabella, R.V & Lagman-Martin, A., 2011. "Foreign Aid, Aid Effectiveness and the New Aid Paradigm: A Review," Sri Lankan Journal of Agricultural Economics, Sri Lanka Agricultural Economics Association (SAEA), vol. 12, pages 1-44.
    14. Mahmoud M. Sabra & Shaker Sartawi, 2015. "Development Impacts of Foreign Aid on Economic Growth, Domestic Savings and Dutch Disease Presence in Palestine," International Journal of Economics and Empirical Research (IJEER), The Economics and Social Development Organization (TESDO), vol. 3(11), pages 532-542, November.
    15. Jean-François Ruhashyankiko, 2005. "Why Do Some Countries Manage to Extract Growth from Foreign Aid?," IMF Working Papers 2005/053, International Monetary Fund.
    16. Axel Dreher & Peter Nunnenkamp & Rainer Thiele, 2008. "Does Aid for Education Educate Children? Evidence from Panel Data," The World Bank Economic Review, World Bank, vol. 22(2), pages 291-314, April.
    17. repec:bep:maccon:v:5:y:2005:i:1:p:1133-1133 is not listed on IDEAS
    18. Silvia Marchesi & Laura Sabani, 2005. "Prolonged Use and Conditionality Failure: Investigating the IMF Responsibility," Development Working Papers 202, Centro Studi Luca d'Agliano, University of Milano.
    19. Axel Dreher & Valentin F. Lang & Sebastian Ziaja, 2017. "Foreign Aid in Areas of Limited Statehood," CESifo Working Paper Series 6340, CESifo.
    20. Djankov, Simeon & Montalvo, Jose G. & Reynal-Querol, Marta, 2009. "Aid with multiple personalities," Journal of Comparative Economics, Elsevier, vol. 37(2), pages 217-229, June.
    21. Craig Burnside & Domenico Fanizza, 2001. "Hiccups for HIPCs?," WIDER Working Paper Series DP2001-99, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    socio-economic development of the region; project financing; institutional aspects; project approach; state support; sector budget support;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • O43 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economic Growth and Aggregate Productivity - - - Institutions and Growth
    • P45 - Political Economy and Comparative Economic Systems - - Other Economic Systems - - - International Linkages
    • R58 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - Regional Government Analysis - - - Regional Development Planning and Policy

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nos:ddldem:23. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Алина Макаренко (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://socionet.ru/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.