IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nos/ddldem/111.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The development of theoretical, methodological and practical recommendations of the innovative development vectors of business process reengineering and strategic management of enterprises

Author

Listed:
  • Oleksandra Mandych

    (State Biotechnological University)

  • Arkadii Mykytas

    (State Biotechnological University)

  • Tetiana Ustik

    (State Biotechnological University)

  • Svitlana Zaika

    (State Biotechnological University)

  • Olena Zaika

    (State Biotechnological University)

Abstract

The object of research is the reengineering of business processes, which is used to increase the effectiveness of strategic management of an enterprise, which will create a new type of environmental enterprise «bioalliance». One of the most problematic places is the possibility of conducting marketing research to ensure the competitiveness of enterprises. The paper used the hypothetical method in substantiating the theoretical and methodological principles of organization and functioning of bio-alliances as the basis of bio-economy for rural areas. The study used the economic-statistical method, ranking of economic zoning, correlation and regression and cluster analysis. These methods were used in the elaboration of directions, sources and strategies of development, components of system and process management, state support for the implementation of traditional and new socio-economic and environmental functions. Also in the course of the work, methods of ideal modelling, mathematical modelling and programming, abstract-logical and structural-logical, extrapolation, expert evaluations, surveys, observations, qualitative and quantitative, imaginary and social experiments were used. The results of the market analyses of agricultural companies showed the inexpediency of agricultural companies. Based on the research, modelling and re-engineering of business processes through the implementation of organisational, corporate, business and functional strategies was proposed. The new form of agrarian enterprises, proposed in the work, is «bioalliance», based on the principles of integration of tourism sphere, sphere of organic production and production of eco-commodities, as well as using bio-resources as the main source. Compared to similar known methodologies of strategic management, the proposed methodology provides enterprises with a high level of importance in the regions, increasing the efficiency of the use of the resources available in their ownership. And also to allocate new market segments in order to attract not only existing, but also potential consumers.

Suggested Citation

  • Oleksandra Mandych & Arkadii Mykytas & Tetiana Ustik & Svitlana Zaika & Olena Zaika, 2021. "The development of theoretical, methodological and practical recommendations of the innovative development vectors of business process reengineering and strategic management of enterprises," Technology audit and production reserves, Socionet;Technology audit and production reserves, vol. 6(4(62)), pages 21-25.
  • Handle: RePEc:nos:ddldem:111
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://journals.uran.ua/tarp/article/view/249830
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Margherita, Alessandro & Heikkilä, Marikka, 2021. "Business continuity in the COVID-19 emergency: A framework of actions undertaken by world-leading companies," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 64(5), pages 683-695.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Wei Feng & Ling Zhao & Yue Chen, 2022. "Research on Collaborative Innovation Mode of Enterprise Group from the Perspective of Comprehensive Innovation Management," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-19, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Fatma Lestari & Margaret Cook & Kelly Johnstone & Miranda Surya Wardhany & Robiana Modjo & Baiduri Widanarko & Devie Fitri Octaviani, 2022. "COVID-19 in the Workplace in Indonesia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-23, February.
    2. Mohamed Saeudy & Ali Meftah Gerged & Khaldoon Albitar, 2022. "Accounting Perspectives on The Business Value of Big Data During and Beyond The COVID-19 Pandemic," Journal of Accounting and Management Information Systems, Faculty of Accounting and Management Information Systems, The Bucharest University of Economic Studies, vol. 21(2), pages 174-199, June.
    3. Cherbib, Jihene, 2024. "Exploring the interplay between entrepreneurial orientation, causation and effectuation under unexpected covid-19 uncertainty: Insights from large French banks," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 200(C).
    4. John Wilson Kimanzi & Anne Christine Kabui & Onesmus Mbaabu Mutiiria, 2024. "Effect of Knowledge Succession on Business Continuity of Community-Based Organizations in Kitui County, Kenya," International Journal of Business and Management, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 19(4), pages 201-201, July.
    5. Isabela Caroline de Sousa & Tiago F. A. C. Sigahi & Izabela Simon Rampasso & Gustavo Hermínio Salati Marcondes de Moraes & Walter Leal Filho & João Henrique Paulino Pires Eustachio & Rosley Anholon, 2024. "A Delphi–Fuzzy Delphi Study on SDGs 9 and 12 after COVID-19: Case Study in Brazil," Forecasting, MDPI, vol. 6(3), pages 1-18, July.
    6. Anna Spoz & Ilona Skibinska-Fabrowska & Grzegorz Kotlinski & Helena Zukowska, 2021. "The Impact of the Covid-19 Pandemic on the Financial Performance of Public Companies in Poland," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(4), pages 955-976.
    7. Sarraf, Shagun & Kushwaha, Amit Kumar & Kar, Arpan Kumar & Dwivedi, Yogesh K. & Giannakis, Mihalis, 2024. "How did online misinformation impact stockouts in the e-commerce supply chain during COVID-19 – A mixed methods study," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 267(C).
    8. Drăgan, George Bogdan & Ben Arfi, Wissal & Tiberius, Victor & Ammari, Aymen, 2023. "Gravitating exogenous shocks to the next normal through entrepreneurial coopetive interactions: A PLS-SEM and fsQCA approach," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 157(C).
    9. Noemi Marujo & Maria do Rosário Borges & Jaime Serra & Rosa Coelho, 2021. "Strategies for Creative Tourism Activities in Pandemic Contexts: The Case of the ‘Saídas de Mestre’ Project," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-17, September.
    10. Anna Kosieradzka & Justyna Smagowicz & Cezary Szwed, 2022. "Application of Protective Measures against COVID-19 in Polish Production Companies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-23, October.
    11. Obłój, Krzysztof & Voronovska, Roksolyana, 2024. "How business pivots during war: Lessons from Ukrainian companies’ responses to crisis," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 67(1), pages 93-105.
    12. Czakon, Wojciech & Hajdas, Monika & Radomska, Joanna, 2023. "Playing the wild cards: Antecedents of family firm resilience," Journal of Family Business Strategy, Elsevier, vol. 14(1).
    13. Julia Siderska, 2021. "The Adoption of Robotic Process Automation Technology to Ensure Business Processes during the COVID-19 Pandemic," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-20, July.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    bioeconomy development; innovative tools; strategic management; marketing research; enterprises competitiveness; agricultural enterprises;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • M11 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Administration - - - Production Management
    • M21 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Economics - - - Business Economics
    • Q57 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Environmental Economics - - - Ecological Economics

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nos:ddldem:111. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Алина Макаренко (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://socionet.ru/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.