IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nms/wsimit/10.5771-0342-300x-2016-7-530.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Gerechtigkeit und Rationalität – Motive interessenpolitischer Aktivierung

Author

Listed:
  • Menz, Wolfgang
  • Nies, Sarah

Abstract

Collective action, whether unionised or not, is usually not a mere result of structural inequalities but. It rather depends on the actual experience that the individual has of violations of the workers’ sense of justicejustice. Drawing on three empirical case studies of activation – in retail, in the IT sector and in public child care services – the article discusses different components of the workers’ sense of justicejustice and their impact on mobiliszation. In our case studies it is the assault on dignity, the violation of the meritocratic principle and the neglect of care responsibility which play the most significant roless infor activation. play the assault on dignity, the violation of the meritocratic principle and the neglect of care responsibility. However, our findings also show that the violation of workers’ ideas of rationality and functionality may also lead to discontent and protest. Regarding the evolvement of a broader social or political movement, conflicts involvingclaims for justicejustice tend towards stronger political generalisations than still are more promising, whereas activation based on the workers’ sense of rationality, which tends to remain within the limits of the particular conflicts at the firm level.

Suggested Citation

  • Menz, Wolfgang & Nies, Sarah, 2016. "Gerechtigkeit und Rationalität – Motive interessenpolitischer Aktivierung," WSI-Mitteilungen, Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG, vol. 69(7), pages 530-539.
  • Handle: RePEc:nms:wsimit:10.5771/0342-300x-2016-7-530
    DOI: 10.5771/0342-300X-2016-7-530
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.nomos-elibrary.de/10.5771/0342-300X-2016-7-530
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.5771/0342-300X-2016-7-530?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Hertwig, Markus & Wirth, Carsten, 2019. "Mitbestimmung ohne Mitbestimmungsrechte? Erkenntnisse aus zwei Fallstudien zum Insourcing von Onsite-Werkverträgen im Einzelhandel," Study / edition der Hans-Böckler-Stiftung, Hans-Böckler-Stiftung, Düsseldorf, volume 127, number 430, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nms:wsimit:10.5771/0342-300x-2016-7-530. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nomos.de/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.