IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nms/mamere/10.5771-0935-9915-2018-2-162.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Fear for Doocing and Digital Privacy in the Workplace: A Dual Pathway Model

Author

Listed:
  • Cortini, Michela
  • Fantinelli, Stefania

Abstract

Little is known about how the fear for doocing and the need for digital privacy manifests at the workplace. We address this knowledge gap with a specific interest in the correlation of fear for doocing with age and gender through an online survey, realized with 119 participants. Results suggest that employees are not always aware of the risk of doocing and they often do not know in specific terms the social networking policies of their organizations. In addition, there is a double effect of employees’ age on the need for digital privacy that is evident in the dual pathway model about the moderated mediation effect. Said in different terms, men and millennials are the employees who feel deeper the need for digital privacy in the workplace, rather than women and older participants.

Suggested Citation

  • Cortini, Michela & Fantinelli, Stefania, 2018. "Fear for Doocing and Digital Privacy in the Workplace: A Dual Pathway Model," management revue - Socio-Economic Studies, Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG, vol. 29(2), pages 162-178.
    • Handle: RePEc:nms:mamere:10.5771/0935-9915-2018-2-162
    DOI: 10.5771/0935-9915-2018-2-162
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.nomos-elibrary.de/10.5771/0935-9915-2018-2-162
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.5771/0935-9915-2018-2-162?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Stefania Fantinelli, 2020. "Can an Abusive Supervision Be a Predictor of Doocing? Comment on Akram, Z.; Li, Y.; Akram, U. When Employees Are Emotionally Exhausted Due to Abusive Supervision. A Conservation-of-Resources Perspecti," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(24), pages 1-3, December.
    2. Michela Cortini & Daniela Converso & Teresa Galanti & Teresa Di Fiore & Alberto Di Domenico & Stefania Fantinelli, 2019. "Gratitude at Work Works! A Mix-Method Study on Different Dimensions of Gratitude, Job Satisfaction, and Job Performance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(14), pages 1-12, July.
    3. Parker, Janna M. & Marasi, Shelly & James, Kevin W. & Wall, Alison, 2019. "Should employees be “dooced” for a social media post? The role of social media marketing governance," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 103(C), pages 1-9.
    4. Stefania Fantinelli & Michela Cortini, 2019. "Social Network Services Management and Risk of Doocing. Comment on Kim, S.; Park, H.; Choi, M.J. “Negative Impact of Social Network Services Based on Stressor-Stress-Outcome: The Role of Experience of," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-3, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nms:mamere:10.5771/0935-9915-2018-2-162. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nomos.de/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.