IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nea/journl/y2021i50p183-190.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Research results and bibliometrics: Is a contradiction anatagonistic?

Author

Listed:
  • Minakir, P.

    (Economic Research Institute, Far Eastern Branch, Russian Academy of Sciences, Khabarovsk, Russia)

Abstract

The legislative reforming of the Russian Academy of Sciences was activated in 2013. Not a consequence, but an important tool for the implementation of this reform and its deepening has become "digitalization" in the form of an exaggerated presentation of the results of scientific activity as bibliometric indicators, including the quality and number of publications. Based on the data of the Russian Science Citation Index the article examines the results of the policy of "increasing the visibility" of Russian economic science in the world publication space. It is shown that in a relatively short time, both extensive and intensive factors of increasing the publication mass are practically exhausted. At the same time, the qualitative parameters of publication activity turn out to be of low variability depending on the dynamics of the publications themselves. The issues of displaying the quality of scientific journals in bibliometric indicators are discussed. The conclusion is made that there is no antagonism between bibliometric and expert metrics when the latter prevail. A sequence of using these metrics is proposed for a comprehensive assessment of the results of scientific activities of organizations and scientists.

Suggested Citation

  • Minakir, P., 2021. "Research results and bibliometrics: Is a contradiction anatagonistic?," Journal of the New Economic Association, New Economic Association, vol. 50(2), pages 183-190.
    • Handle: RePEc:nea:journl:y:2021:i:50:p:183-190
    DOI: 10.31737/2221-2264-2021-50-2-10
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.econorus.org/repec/journl/2021-50-183-190r.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.31737/2221-2264-2021-50-2-10?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Rubinstein, A., 2016. "Ranking of Russian Economic Journals: The Scientific Method or "Numbers Game"," Journal of the New Economic Association, New Economic Association, vol. 30(2), pages 162-175.
    2. Minakir, P., 2019. "Economic magazines in the interior of a competitive market," Journal of the New Economic Association, New Economic Association, vol. 44(4), pages 210-216.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Anna Kireenko, 2021. "Improving tax journal’s international visibility: Findings from literature review and faculty survey," Journal of Tax Reform, Graduate School of Economics and Management, Ural Federal University, vol. 7(3), pages 267-283.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Aleskerov, F. & Kazachinskaya, A. & Karabekyan, D. & Semina, A. & Yakuba, V., 2021. "Economic journals of Russia, their characteristics and network analysis," Journal of the New Economic Association, New Economic Association, vol. 50(2), pages 170-182.
    2. Moskovkin, V.M. (Московкин, В.М.) & sun, X. (Сунь, С.), 2019. "Methodology of regional analysis of the Russian economic reseaerch market [Методология Регионального Анализа Российского Рынка Экономических Исследований]," Economy of science, Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration, vol. 5, pages 67-78, April.
    3. Rubinstein, A., 2019. "Man shall not live by RSCI alone..," Journal of the New Economic Association, New Economic Association, vol. 44(4), pages 245-259.
    4. Rubinstein, Alexander & Slutskin, Lev, 2018. "«Multiway data analysis» and the general problem of journals’ ranking," Applied Econometrics, Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration (RANEPA), vol. 50, pages 90-113.
    5. Rubinstein, A. & Burakov, N., 2021. "Economic journals in the optics of scientometrics," Journal of the New Economic Association, New Economic Association, vol. 50(2), pages 205-215.
    6. V. M. Moskovkin & X. Sun, 2019. "Methodology of regional analysis of the Russian economic reseaerch market," Economics of Science, Delo Publishing house, vol. 5(1).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    reform of science; productivity of scientific organizations' activity; bibliometric data; scientific results;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • I28 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Education - - - Government Policy
    • O38 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - Government Policy
    • O39 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - Other

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nea:journl:y:2021:i:50:p:183-190. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Alexey Tcharykov (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/nearuea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.