Do Capital Controls Matter in India?
Author
Abstract
Suggested Citation
Download full text from publisher
Citations
Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
Cited by:
- Morgan, Peter J. & Lamberte , Mario, 2012.
"Strengthening Financial Infrastructure,"
ADBI Working Papers
345, Asian Development Bank Institute.
- Peter J. Morgan & Mario Lamberte, 2012. "Strengthening Financial Infrastructure," Finance Working Papers 23191, East Asian Bureau of Economic Research.
- Ma, Guonan & McCauley, Robert N., 2013.
"Is China or India more financially open?,"
Journal of International Money and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 39(C), pages 6-27.
- Guonan Ma & Robert N McCauley, 2013. "Is China or India more financially open?," BIS Working Papers 410, Bank for International Settlements.
More about this item
Keywords
India’s capital account liberalization began 20 years ago; but a lot of controls still remain. The central bank’s strategy has been to open financial markets cautiously while ensuring risk management systems and competencies are in place to ensure the system’s resilience to foreign shocks. Has the regulation insulated Indian markets from global shocks? This paper estimates uncovered interest parity relationships and finds that capital controls continue to provide a certain degree of autonomy to the central bank when setting policy rates. Vector Autoregressive (VAR) models are constructed to derive impulse response functions illustrating the transmission of a shock to foreign capital inflows through the different segments of India’s financial sector. To provide a sense of the complexity of the regulation on capital account transactions; the paper provides a primer on the controls in place; which it uses to identify coefficient restrictions in the Structural VAR model;All these keywords.
JEL classification:
- D24 - Microeconomics - - Production and Organizations - - - Production; Cost; Capital; Capital, Total Factor, and Multifactor Productivity; Capacity
- F16 - International Economics - - Trade - - - Trade and Labor Market Interactions
- J5 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Labor-Management Relations, Trade Unions, and Collective Bargaining
- J8 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Labor Standards
- K31 - Law and Economics - - Other Substantive Areas of Law - - - Labor Law
Statistics
Access and download statisticsCorrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nca:ncaerj:v:8:y:2012:i:2012-1:p:225-276. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: B Ramesh (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ncaerin.html .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.