IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nbp/nbpbik/v48y2017i3p235-262.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Analysing revisions to the standardised approach in credit risk. Evidence from sovereigns

Author

Listed:
  • Lukasz Prorokowski

    (H.L. Prorokowski LLC)

Abstract

In December 2015, the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision issued an updated consultative paper that proposes new standards for the standardised treatment of credit risk exposures in the banking book. Reviewing the proposed changes to calculating risk weights, this paper advises on areas that require further improvements from regulators and policymakers, and immediate attention from practitioners. The paper empirically tests for a trade-off between various methodologies of calculating risk weights for sovereign exposures under the standardised approach for credit risk. In doing so, the paper highlights large discrepancies in the risk-weighted capital caused by choosing different calculation methods prescribed by the revised standards. The paper concludes that the standards for the standardised treatment of credit risk require further amendments to address the issues revolving around different capital levels for the same exposure.

Suggested Citation

  • Lukasz Prorokowski, 2017. "Analysing revisions to the standardised approach in credit risk. Evidence from sovereigns," Bank i Kredyt, Narodowy Bank Polski, vol. 48(3), pages 235-262.
    • Handle: RePEc:nbp:nbpbik:v:48:y:2017:i:3:p:235-262
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://bankikredyt.nbp.pl/content/2017/03/BIK_03_2017_01Prorokowski.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Francesco Vallascas & Jens Hagendorff, 2013. "The Risk Sensitivity of Capital Requirements: Evidence from an International Sample of Large Banks," Review of Finance, European Finance Association, vol. 17(6), pages 1947-1988.
    2. Van Roy, Patrick, 2005. "Credit ratings and the standardised approach to credit risk in Basel II," Working Paper Series 517, European Central Bank.
    3. Ms. Sofiya Avramova & Mrs. Vanessa Le Lesle, 2012. "Revisiting Risk-Weighted Assets," IMF Working Papers 2012/090, International Monetary Fund.
    4. Lukasz Prorokowski & Hubert Prorokowski, 2014. "Comprehensive risk measure – current challenges," Journal of Financial Regulation and Compliance, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 22(3), pages 271-284, July.
    5. Jones, David, 2000. "Emerging problems with the Basel Capital Accord: Regulatory capital arbitrage and related issues," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 24(1-2), pages 35-58, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jan Nokkala, 2022. "Are large credit exposures a source of concentration risk?," Bank i Kredyt, Narodowy Bank Polski, vol. 53(4), pages 375-398.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mohamed Albaity & Mohammadmahdi Toobaee, 2017. "The Risk-sensitivity of Bank Capital Requirements: The Moderating Effects of Capital Regulation and Supervisory Power," International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, Econjournals, vol. 7(2), pages 94-102.
    2. Böhnke, Victoria & Ongena, Steven & Paraschiv, Florentina & Reite, Endre J., 2023. "Back to the roots of internal credit risk models: Does risk explain why banks' risk-weighted asset levels converge over time?," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 156(C).
    3. Beltratti, Andrea & Paladino, Giovanna, 2016. "Basel II and regulatory arbitrage. Evidence from financial crises," Journal of Empirical Finance, Elsevier, vol. 39(PB), pages 180-196.
    4. Renaud Beaupain & Yann Braouezec, 2022. "International banking regulation and Tier 1 capital ratios. On the robustness of the critical average risk weight framework," Working Papers 2022-ACF-06, IESEG School of Management.
    5. Stepankova, Barbora & Teply, Petr, 2023. "Consistency of banks' internal probability of default estimates: Empirical evidence from the COVID-19 crisis," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 154(C).
    6. Markus Behn & Rainer Haselmann & Vikrant Vig, 2022. "The Limits of Model‐Based Regulation," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 77(3), pages 1635-1684, June.
    7. Beaupain, Renaud & Braouezec, Yann, 2024. "International banking regulation and Tier 1 capital ratios. On the robustness of the critical average risk weight framework," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    8. Delis, Manthos D. & Kim, Suk-Joong & Politsidis, Panagiotis N. & Wu, Eliza, 2021. "Regulators vs. markets: Are lending terms influenced by different perceptions of bank risk?," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 122(C).
    9. Conlon, Thomas & Cotter, John & Molyneux, Philip, 2020. "Beyond common equity: The influence of secondary capital on bank insolvency risk," Journal of Financial Stability, Elsevier, vol. 47(C).
    10. Yishu Fu & Shih-Cheng Lee & Lei Xu & Ralf Zurbruegg, 2015. "The Effectiveness of Capital Regulation on Bank Behavior in China," International Review of Finance, International Review of Finance Ltd., vol. 15(3), pages 321-345, September.
    11. Barucci, Emilio & Milani, Carlo, 2018. "Do European banks manipulate risk weights?," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 47-57.
    12. Ferri, Giovanni & Pesic, Valerio, 2017. "Bank regulatory arbitrage via risk weighted assets dispersion," Journal of Financial Stability, Elsevier, vol. 33(C), pages 331-345.
    13. Liu, Cai, 2021. "The IRB model, bank regulatory arbitrage, and the Eurozone crisis," Journal of International Money and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 116(C).
    14. Delis, Manthos & Kim, Suk-Joong & Politsidis, Panagiotis & Wu, Eliza, 2020. "Regulators vs. markets: Do differences in their bank risk perceptions affect lending terms?," MPRA Paper 98548, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    15. Yann Braouezec & Lakshithe Wagalath, 2016. "Risk-based capital requirements and optimal liquidation in a stress scenario," Working Papers 2016-ACF-01, IESEG School of Management.
    16. Behn, Markus & Haselmann, Rainer & Vig, Vikrant, 2014. "Risk weights, lending, and financial stability: Limits to model-based capital regulation," VfS Annual Conference 2014 (Hamburg): Evidence-based Economic Policy 100430, Verein für Socialpolitik / German Economic Association.
    17. repec:ies:wpaper:f202211 is not listed on IDEAS
    18. Barakova, Irina & Palvia, Ajay, 2014. "Do banks’ internal Basel risk estimates reflect risk?," Journal of Financial Stability, Elsevier, vol. 13(C), pages 167-179.
    19. Daniela Laas & Caroline Franziska Siegel, 2017. "Basel III Versus Solvency II: An Analysis of Regulatory Consistency Under the New Capital Standards," Journal of Risk & Insurance, The American Risk and Insurance Association, vol. 84(4), pages 1231-1267, December.
    20. Eva Catarineu-Rabell & Patricia Jackson & Dimitrios Tsomocos, 2005. "Procyclicality and the new Basel Accord - banks’ choice of loan rating system," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 26(3), pages 537-557, October.
    21. Christian Calmès & Raymond Théoret, 2021. "Portfolio analysis of big US banks’ performance: the fee business lines factor," Journal of Banking Regulation, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 22(2), pages 112-132, June.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    standardised approach; credit risk; sovereign exposures; risk weights; capital charge;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • G21 - Financial Economics - - Financial Institutions and Services - - - Banks; Other Depository Institutions; Micro Finance Institutions; Mortgages
    • G28 - Financial Economics - - Financial Institutions and Services - - - Government Policy and Regulation

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nbp:nbpbik:v:48:y:2017:i:3:p:235-262. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wojciech Burjanek (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/nbpgvpl.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.