Author
Listed:
- Katherine L. Milkman
(University of Pennsylvania)
- Sean F. Ellis
(University of Pennsylvania)
- Dena M. Gromet
(University of Pennsylvania)
- Youngwoo Jung
(University of Pennsylvania)
- Alex S. Luscher
(University of Pennsylvania)
- Rayyan S. Mobarak
(University of Maryland)
- Madeline K. Paxson
(University of Pennsylvania)
- Ramon A. Silvera Zumaran
(University of Pennsylvania)
- Robert Kuan
(University of Pennsylvania)
- Ron Berman
(University of Pennsylvania)
- Neil A. Lewis
(Cornell University)
- John A. List
(University of Chicago)
- Mitesh S. Patel
(Ascension Health)
- Christophe Bulte
(University of Pennsylvania)
- Kevin G. Volpp
(University of Pennsylvania)
- Maryann V. Beauvais
(CVS Health)
- Jonathon K. Bellows
(CVS Health)
- Cheryl A. Marandola
(CVS Health)
- Angela L. Duckworth
(University of Pennsylvania
University of Pennsylvania)
Abstract
Encouraging routine COVID-19 vaccinations is likely to be a crucial policy challenge for decades to come. To avert hundreds of thousands of unnecessary hospitalizations and deaths, adoption will need to be higher than it was in the autumn of 2022 or 2023, when less than one-fifth of Americans received booster vaccines1,2. One approach to encouraging vaccination is to eliminate the friction of transportation hurdles. Previous research has shown that friction can hinder follow-through3 and that individuals who live farther from COVID-19 vaccination sites are less likely to get vaccinated4. However, the value of providing free round-trip transportation to vaccination sites is unknown. Here we show that offering people free round-trip Lyft rides to pharmacies has no benefit over and above sending them behaviourally informed text messages reminding them to get vaccinated. We determined this by running a megastudy with millions of CVS Pharmacy patients in the United States testing the effects of (1) free round-trip Lyft rides to CVS Pharmacies for vaccination appointments and (2) seven different sets of behaviourally informed vaccine reminder messages. Our results suggest that offering previously vaccinated individuals free rides to vaccination sites is not a good investment in the United States, contrary to the high expectations of both expert and lay forecasters. Instead, people in the United States should be sent behaviourally informed COVID-19 vaccination reminders, which increased the 30-day COVID-19 booster uptake by 21% (1.05 percentage points) and spilled over to increase 30-day influenza vaccinations by 8% (0.34 percentage points) in our megastudy. More rigorous testing of interventions to promote vaccination is needed to ensure that evidence-based solutions are deployed widely and that ineffective but intuitively appealing tools are discontinued.
Suggested Citation
Katherine L. Milkman & Sean F. Ellis & Dena M. Gromet & Youngwoo Jung & Alex S. Luscher & Rayyan S. Mobarak & Madeline K. Paxson & Ramon A. Silvera Zumaran & Robert Kuan & Ron Berman & Neil A. Lewis &, 2024.
"Megastudy shows that reminders boost vaccination but adding free rides does not,"
Nature, Nature, vol. 631(8019), pages 179-188, July.
Handle:
RePEc:nat:nature:v:631:y:2024:i:8019:d:10.1038_s41586-024-07591-x
DOI: 10.1038/s41586-024-07591-x
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version below or search for a different version of it.
Other versions of this item:
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:631:y:2024:i:8019:d:10.1038_s41586-024-07591-x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.