Author
Listed:
- Piotr Wlodzimierz
(University of Cambridge)
- Fernando A. Rabanal
(Max Planck Institute for Biology Tübingen)
- Robin Burns
(University of Cambridge)
- Matthew Naish
(University of Cambridge)
- Elias Primetis
(University of Sussex)
- Alison Scott
(Max Planck Institute for Plant Breeding Research)
- Terezie Mandáková
(Masaryk University)
- Nicola Gorringe
(University of Cambridge)
- Andrew J. Tock
(University of Cambridge)
- Daniel Holland
(University of Cambridge)
- Katrin Fritschi
(Max Planck Institute for Biology Tübingen)
- Anette Habring
(Max Planck Institute for Biology Tübingen)
- Christa Lanz
(Max Planck Institute for Biology Tübingen)
- Christie Patel
(University of Cambridge)
- Theresa Schlegel
(Max Planck Institute for Biology Tübingen)
- Maximilian Collenberg
(Max Planck Institute for Biology Tübingen)
- Miriam Mielke
(Max Planck Institute for Biology Tübingen)
- Magnus Nordborg
(Gregor Mendel Institute, Vienna, Austrian Academy of Sciences, Vienna BioCenter)
- Fabrice Roux
(Université de Toulouse)
- Gautam Shirsekar
(Max Planck Institute for Biology Tübingen)
- Carlos Alonso-Blanco
(Centro Nacional de Biotecnología, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas)
- Martin A. Lysak
(Masaryk University)
- Polina Y. Novikova
(Max Planck Institute for Plant Breeding Research)
- Alexandros Bousios
(University of Sussex)
- Detlef Weigel
(Max Planck Institute for Biology Tübingen)
- Ian R. Henderson
(University of Cambridge)
Abstract
Centromeres are critical for cell division, loading CENH3 or CENPA histone variant nucleosomes, directing kinetochore formation and allowing chromosome segregation1,2. Despite their conserved function, centromere size and structure are diverse across species. To understand this centromere paradox3,4, it is necessary to know how centromeric diversity is generated and whether it reflects ancient trans-species variation or, instead, rapid post-speciation divergence. To address these questions, we assembled 346 centromeres from 66 Arabidopsis thaliana and 2 Arabidopsis lyrata accessions, which exhibited a remarkable degree of intra- and inter-species diversity. A. thaliana centromere repeat arrays are embedded in linkage blocks, despite ongoing internal satellite turnover, consistent with roles for unidirectional gene conversion or unequal crossover between sister chromatids in sequence diversification. Additionally, centrophilic ATHILA transposons have recently invaded the satellite arrays. To counter ATHILA invasion, chromosome-specific bursts of satellite homogenization generate higher-order repeats and purge transposons, in line with cycles of repeat evolution. Centromeric sequence changes are even more extreme in comparison between A. thaliana and A. lyrata. Together, our findings identify rapid cycles of transposon invasion and purging through satellite homogenization, which drive centromere evolution and ultimately contribute to speciation.
Suggested Citation
Piotr Wlodzimierz & Fernando A. Rabanal & Robin Burns & Matthew Naish & Elias Primetis & Alison Scott & Terezie Mandáková & Nicola Gorringe & Andrew J. Tock & Daniel Holland & Katrin Fritschi & Anette, 2023.
"Cycles of satellite and transposon evolution in Arabidopsis centromeres,"
Nature, Nature, vol. 618(7965), pages 557-565, June.
Handle:
RePEc:nat:nature:v:618:y:2023:i:7965:d:10.1038_s41586-023-06062-z
DOI: 10.1038/s41586-023-06062-z
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:618:y:2023:i:7965:d:10.1038_s41586-023-06062-z. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.