IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nat/nature/v618y2023i7963d10.1038_s41586-023-05936-6.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Ancient gene linkages support ctenophores as sister to other animals

Author

Listed:
  • Darrin T. Schultz

    (University of Vienna
    Monterey Bay Aquarium Research Institute
    University of California)

  • Steven H. D. Haddock

    (Monterey Bay Aquarium Research Institute
    University of California)

  • Jessen V. Bredeson

    (University of California)

  • Richard E. Green

    (University of California)

  • Oleg Simakov

    (University of Vienna)

  • Daniel S. Rokhsar

    (University of California
    Okinawa Institute of Science and Technology Graduate University
    Chan Zuckerberg Biohub)

Abstract

A central question in evolutionary biology is whether sponges or ctenophores (comb jellies) are the sister group to all other animals. These alternative phylogenetic hypotheses imply different scenarios for the evolution of complex neural systems and other animal-specific traits1–6. Conventional phylogenetic approaches based on morphological characters and increasingly extensive gene sequence collections have not been able to definitively answer this question7–11. Here we develop chromosome-scale gene linkage, also known as synteny, as a phylogenetic character for resolving this question12. We report new chromosome-scale genomes for a ctenophore and two marine sponges, and for three unicellular relatives of animals (a choanoflagellate, a filasterean amoeba and an ichthyosporean) that serve as outgroups for phylogenetic analysis. We find ancient syntenies that are conserved between animals and their close unicellular relatives. Ctenophores and unicellular eukaryotes share ancestral metazoan patterns, whereas sponges, bilaterians, and cnidarians share derived chromosomal rearrangements. Conserved syntenic characters unite sponges with bilaterians, cnidarians, and placozoans in a monophyletic clade to the exclusion of ctenophores, placing ctenophores as the sister group to all other animals. The patterns of synteny shared by sponges, bilaterians, and cnidarians are the result of rare and irreversible chromosome fusion-and-mixing events that provide robust and unambiguous phylogenetic support for the ctenophore-sister hypothesis. These findings provide a new framework for resolving deep, recalcitrant phylogenetic problems and have implications for our understanding of animal evolution.

Suggested Citation

  • Darrin T. Schultz & Steven H. D. Haddock & Jessen V. Bredeson & Richard E. Green & Oleg Simakov & Daniel S. Rokhsar, 2023. "Ancient gene linkages support ctenophores as sister to other animals," Nature, Nature, vol. 618(7963), pages 110-117, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:618:y:2023:i:7963:d:10.1038_s41586-023-05936-6
    DOI: 10.1038/s41586-023-05936-6
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-023-05936-6
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1038/s41586-023-05936-6?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Lauren E. Vandepas & Caroline Stefani & Phillip P. Domeier & Nikki Traylor-Knowles & Frederick W. Goetz & William E. Browne & Adam Lacy-Hulbert, 2024. "Extracellular DNA traps in a ctenophore demonstrate immune cell behaviors in a non-bilaterian," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-11, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:618:y:2023:i:7963:d:10.1038_s41586-023-05936-6. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.