IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nat/nature/v612y2022i7940d10.1038_s41586-022-05447-w.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Wetland emission and atmospheric sink changes explain methane growth in 2020

Author

Listed:
  • Shushi Peng

    (Peking University
    Peking University
    Peking University)

  • Xin Lin

    (Université Paris-Saclay)

  • Rona L. Thompson

    (Norwegian Institute for Air Research (NILU))

  • Yi Xi

    (Peking University
    Peking University)

  • Gang Liu

    (Peking University
    Peking University)

  • Didier Hauglustaine

    (Université Paris-Saclay)

  • Xin Lan

    (Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences of University of Colorado
    National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration)

  • Benjamin Poulter

    (NASA Goddard Space Flight Center)

  • Michel Ramonet

    (Université Paris-Saclay)

  • Marielle Saunois

    (Université Paris-Saclay)

  • Yi Yin

    (California Institute of Technology)

  • Zhen Zhang

    (University of Maryland)

  • Bo Zheng

    (Tsinghua University
    State Environmental Protection Key Laboratory of Sources and Control of Air Pollution Complex)

  • Philippe Ciais

    (Université Paris-Saclay
    The Cyprus Institute)

Abstract

Atmospheric methane growth reached an exceptionally high rate of 15.1 ± 0.4 parts per billion per year in 2020 despite a probable decrease in anthropogenic methane emissions during COVID-19 lockdowns1. Here we quantify changes in methane sources and in its atmospheric sink in 2020 compared with 2019. We find that, globally, total anthropogenic emissions decreased by 1.2 ± 0.1 teragrams of methane per year (Tg CH4 yr−1), fire emissions decreased by 6.5 ± 0.1 Tg CH4 yr−1 and wetland emissions increased by 6.0 ± 2.3 Tg CH4 yr−1. Tropospheric OH concentration decreased by 1.6 ± 0.2 per cent relative to 2019, mainly as a result of lower anthropogenic nitrogen oxide (NOx) emissions and associated lower free tropospheric ozone during pandemic lockdowns2. From atmospheric inversions, we also infer that global net emissions increased by 6.9 ± 2.1 Tg CH4 yr−1 in 2020 relative to 2019, and global methane removal from reaction with OH decreased by 7.5 ± 0.8 Tg CH4 yr−1. Therefore, we attribute the methane growth rate anomaly in 2020 relative to 2019 to lower OH sink (53 ± 10 per cent) and higher natural emissions (47 ± 16 per cent), mostly from wetlands. In line with previous findings3,4, our results imply that wetland methane emissions are sensitive to a warmer and wetter climate and could act as a positive feedback mechanism in the future. Our study also suggests that nitrogen oxide emission trends need to be taken into account when implementing the global anthropogenic methane emissions reduction pledge5.

Suggested Citation

  • Shushi Peng & Xin Lin & Rona L. Thompson & Yi Xi & Gang Liu & Didier Hauglustaine & Xin Lan & Benjamin Poulter & Michel Ramonet & Marielle Saunois & Yi Yin & Zhen Zhang & Bo Zheng & Philippe Ciais, 2022. "Wetland emission and atmospheric sink changes explain methane growth in 2020," Nature, Nature, vol. 612(7940), pages 477-482, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:612:y:2022:i:7940:d:10.1038_s41586-022-05447-w
    DOI: 10.1038/s41586-022-05447-w
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-022-05447-w
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1038/s41586-022-05447-w?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Shiliang Liu & Yingying Chen & Rongjie Yang & Di Li & Yuling Qiu & Kezhu Lu & Xinhao Cao & Qibing Chen, 2024. "Spatiotemporal Dynamics of Constructed Wetland Landscape Patterns during Rapid Urbanization in Chengdu, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-26, June.
    2. Mingxu Liu & Yu Song & Hitoshi Matsui & Fang Shang & Ling Kang & Xuhui Cai & Hongsheng Zhang & Tong Zhu, 2024. "Enhanced atmospheric oxidation toward carbon neutrality reduces methane’s climate forcing," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-8, December.
    3. Francesco D’Amico & Ivano Ammoscato & Daniel Gullì & Elenio Avolio & Teresa Lo Feudo & Mariafrancesca De Pino & Paolo Cristofanelli & Luana Malacaria & Domenico Parise & Salvatore Sinopoli & Giorgia D, 2024. "Anthropic-Induced Variability of Greenhouse Gasses and Aerosols at the WMO/GAW Coastal Site of Lamezia Terme (Calabria, Southern Italy): Towards a New Method to Assess the Weekly Distribution of Gathe," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(18), pages 1-31, September.
    4. Tilman Schmider & Anne Grethe Hestnes & Julia Brzykcy & Hannes Schmidt & Arno Schintlmeister & Benjamin R. K. Roller & Ezequiel Jesús Teran & Andrea Söllinger & Oliver Schmidt & Martin F. Polz & Andre, 2024. "Physiological basis for atmospheric methane oxidation and methanotrophic growth on air," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-15, December.
    5. Francesco D’Amico & Ivano Ammoscato & Daniel Gullì & Elenio Avolio & Teresa Lo Feudo & Mariafrancesca De Pino & Paolo Cristofanelli & Luana Malacaria & Domenico Parise & Salvatore Sinopoli & Giorgia D, 2024. "Trends in CO, CO 2 , CH 4 , BC, and NO x during the First 2020 COVID-19 Lockdown: Source Insights from the WMO/GAW Station of Lamezia Terme (Calabria, Southern Italy)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(18), pages 1-28, September.
    6. repec:caa:jnlpse:v:preprint:id:340-2023-pse is not listed on IDEAS
    7. Zhao, Jianyu & Meng, Chaobiao & Yang, Kaijing & Shock, Clinton C. & Wang, Ning & Wang, Fengxin, 2024. "The use of small emitter flow rate in drip irrigation favored methane uptake in arid potato fields," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 291(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:612:y:2022:i:7940:d:10.1038_s41586-022-05447-w. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.