Author
Listed:
- Jeffrey V. Lazarus
(Barcelona Institute for Global Health (ISGlobal)
University of Barcelona
City University of New York Graduate School of Public Health and Health Policy (CUNY SPH))
- Diana Romero
(City University of New York Graduate School of Public Health and Health Policy (CUNY SPH))
- Christopher J. Kopka
(Independent Researcher)
- Salim Abdool Karim
(University of KwaZulu-Natal
Centre for the AIDS Program of Research in South Africa (CAPRISA))
- Laith J. Abu-Raddad
(Weill Cornell Medicine, Cornell University
Weill Cornell Medicine-Qatar, Cornell University, Qatar Foundation-Education City)
- Gisele Almeida
(Pan American Health Organisation)
- Ricardo Baptista-Leite
(UNITE Global Parliamentarians Network
Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, Maastricht University
Institute of Health Sciences (CIIS), Catholic University of Portugal)
- Joshua A. Barocas
(University of Colorado School of Medicine)
- Mauricio L. Barreto
(Oswaldo Cruz Foundation (Fiocruz)
University of Bahia)
- Yaneer Bar-Yam
(New England Complex Systems Institute)
- Quique Bassat
(Barcelona Institute for Global Health (ISGlobal)
Manhiça Health Research Center (CISM)
Catalan Institute for Research and Advanced Studies (ICREA)
University of Barcelona)
- Carolina Batista
(Doctors Without Borders (MSF)
Baraka Impact Finance)
- Morgan Bazilian
(Payne Institute, Colorado School of Mines)
- Shu-Ti Chiou
(National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University)
- Carlos Rio
(Emory School of Medicine)
- Gregory J. Dore
(University of New South Wales (UNSW) Sydney)
- George F. Gao
(Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention)
- Lawrence O. Gostin
(The O’Neill Institute for National and Global Health Law, Georgetown University)
- Margaret Hellard
(Burnet Institute)
- Jose L. Jimenez
(University of Colorado Boulder
University of Colorado Boulder)
- Gagandeep Kang
(Christian Medical College (CMC))
- Nancy Lee
(Wilton Park)
- Mojca Matičič
(University Medical Centre
University of Ljubljana)
- Martin McKee
(The London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine)
- Sabin Nsanzimana
(University Teaching Hospital of Butare)
- Miquel Oliu-Barton
(Paris Dauphine University - PSL)
- Bary Pradelski
(French National Centre for Scientific Research (CNRS))
- Oksana Pyzik
(University College London (UCL))
- Kenneth Rabin
(City University of New York Graduate School of Public Health and Health Policy (CUNY SPH))
- Sunil Raina
(Dr. Rajendra Prasad Government Medical College)
- Sabina Faiz Rashid
(BRAC University)
- Magdalena Rathe
(Plenitud Foundation)
- Rocio Saenz
(University of Costa Rica)
- Sudhvir Singh
(University of Auckland)
- Malene Trock-Hempler
(Independent Philosopher)
- Sonia Villapol
(Department of Neurosurgery, Houston Methodist Research Institute)
- Peiling Yap
(International Digital Health & AI Research Collaborative (I-DAIR))
- Agnes Binagwaho
(University of Global Health Equity)
- Adeeba Kamarulzaman
(University of Malaya)
- Ayman El-Mohandes
(City University of New York Graduate School of Public Health and Health Policy (CUNY SPH))
Abstract
Despite notable scientific and medical advances, broader political, socioeconomic and behavioural factors continue to undercut the response to the COVID-19 pandemic1,2. Here we convened, as part of this Delphi study, a diverse, multidisciplinary panel of 386 academic, health, non-governmental organization, government and other experts in COVID-19 response from 112 countries and territories to recommend specific actions to end this persistent global threat to public health. The panel developed a set of 41 consensus statements and 57 recommendations to governments, health systems, industry and other key stakeholders across six domains: communication; health systems; vaccination; prevention; treatment and care; and inequities. In the wake of nearly three years of fragmented global and national responses, it is instructive to note that three of the highest-ranked recommendations call for the adoption of whole-of-society and whole-of-government approaches1, while maintaining proven prevention measures using a vaccines-plus approach2 that employs a range of public health and financial support measures to complement vaccination. Other recommendations with at least 99% combined agreement advise governments and other stakeholders to improve communication, rebuild public trust and engage communities3 in the management of pandemic responses. The findings of the study, which have been further endorsed by 184 organizations globally, include points of unanimous agreement, as well as six recommendations with >5% disagreement, that provide health and social policy actions to address inadequacies in the pandemic response and help to bring this public health threat to an end.
Suggested Citation
Jeffrey V. Lazarus & Diana Romero & Christopher J. Kopka & Salim Abdool Karim & Laith J. Abu-Raddad & Gisele Almeida & Ricardo Baptista-Leite & Joshua A. Barocas & Mauricio L. Barreto & Yaneer Bar-Yam, 2022.
"A multinational Delphi consensus to end the COVID-19 public health threat,"
Nature, Nature, vol. 611(7935), pages 332-345, November.
Handle:
RePEc:nat:nature:v:611:y:2022:i:7935:d:10.1038_s41586-022-05398-2
DOI: 10.1038/s41586-022-05398-2
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Citations
Citations are extracted by the
CitEc Project, subscribe to its
RSS feed for this item.
Cited by:
- Grimalda, Gianluca & Murtin, Fabrice & Pipke, David & Putterman, Louis & Sutter, Matthias, 2023.
"The politicized pandemic: Ideological polarization and the behavioral response to COVID-19,"
European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 156(C).
- Gianluca Grimalda & Fabrice Murtin & David Pipke & Louis Putterman & Matthias Sutter, 2022.
"The politicized pandemic: Ideological polarization and the behavioral response to COVID-19,"
Discussion Paper Series of the Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods
2022_1, Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods.
- Gianluca Grimalda & Fabrice Murtin & David Pipke & Louis Putterman & Matthias Sutter, 2022.
"The Politicized Pandemic: Ideological Polarization and the Behavioral Response to COVID-19,"
ECONtribute Discussion Papers Series
138, University of Bonn and University of Cologne, Germany.
- Grimalda, Gianluca & Murtin, Fabrice & Pipke, David & Putterman, Louis & Sutter, Matthias, 2022.
"The Politicized Pandemic: Ideological Polarization and the Behavioral Response to COVID-19,"
IZA Discussion Papers
15032, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
- Gianluca Grimalda & Fabrice Murtin & David Pipke & Louis Putterman & Matthias Sutter, 2022.
"The politicized pandemic: Ideological polarization and the behavioral response to COVID-19,"
Discussion Paper Series of the Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods
2022_01, Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods.
- Grimalda, Gianluca & Murtin, Fabrice & Pipke, David & Putterman, Louis G. & Sutter, Matthias, 2022.
"The politicized pandemic: Ideological polarization and the behavioral response to COVID-19,"
Kiel Working Papers
2207, Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel).
- Eva Seidlmayer & Tetyana Melnychuk & Lukas Galke & Lisa Kühnel & Klaus Tochtermann & Carsten Schultz & Konrad U. Förstner, 2024.
"Research topic displacement and the lack of interdisciplinarity: lessons from the scientific response to COVID-19,"
Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 129(9), pages 5141-5179, September.
- Yong Ge & Xilin Wu & Wenbin Zhang & Xiaoli Wang & Die Zhang & Jianghao Wang & Haiyan Liu & Zhoupeng Ren & Nick W. Ruktanonchai & Corrine W. Ruktanonchai & Eimear Cleary & Yongcheng Yao & Amy Wesolowsk, 2023.
"Effects of public-health measures for zeroing out different SARS-CoV-2 variants,"
Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-12, December.
- Heinlein, Bastian & De Domenico, Manlio, 2023.
"Unraveling the role of adapting risk perception during the COVID-19 pandemic in Europe,"
Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 177(C).
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:611:y:2022:i:7935:d:10.1038_s41586-022-05398-2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.