IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nat/nature/v607y2022i7917d10.1038_s41586-022-04877-w.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Compatibility rules of human enhancer and promoter sequences

Author

Listed:
  • Drew T. Bergman

    (Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard
    Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth)

  • Thouis R. Jones

    (Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard)

  • Vincent Liu

    (Stanford University School of Medicine)

  • Judhajeet Ray

    (Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard)

  • Evelyn Jagoda

    (Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard)

  • Layla Siraj

    (Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard
    Harvard University)

  • Helen Y. Kang

    (Stanford University School of Medicine
    Lucile Packard Children’s Hospital, Stanford University School of Medicine)

  • Joseph Nasser

    (Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard)

  • Michael Kane

    (Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard)

  • Antonio Rios

    (Stanford University School of Medicine)

  • Tung H. Nguyen

    (Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard)

  • Sharon R. Grossman

    (Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard)

  • Charles P. Fulco

    (Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard
    Bristol Myers Squibb)

  • Eric S. Lander

    (Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard
    MIT
    Harvard Medical School)

  • Jesse M. Engreitz

    (Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard
    Stanford University School of Medicine
    Lucile Packard Children’s Hospital, Stanford University School of Medicine)

Abstract

Gene regulation in the human genome is controlled by distal enhancers that activate specific nearby promoters1. A proposed model for this specificity is that promoters have sequence-encoded preferences for certain enhancers, for example, mediated by interacting sets of transcription factors or cofactors2. This ‘biochemical compatibility’ model has been supported by observations at individual human promoters and by genome-wide measurements in Drosophila3–9. However, the degree to which human enhancers and promoters are intrinsically compatible has not yet been systematically measured, and how their activities combine to control RNA expression remains unclear. Here we design a high-throughput reporter assay called enhancer × promoter self-transcribing active regulatory region sequencing (ExP STARR-seq) and applied it to examine the combinatorial compatibilities of 1,000 enhancer and 1,000 promoter sequences in human K562 cells. We identify simple rules for enhancer–promoter compatibility, whereby most enhancers activate all promoters by similar amounts, and intrinsic enhancer and promoter activities multiplicatively combine to determine RNA output (R2 = 0.82). In addition, two classes of enhancers and promoters show subtle preferential effects. Promoters of housekeeping genes contain built-in activating motifs for factors such as GABPA and YY1, which decrease the responsiveness of promoters to distal enhancers. Promoters of variably expressed genes lack these motifs and show stronger responsiveness to enhancers. Together, this systematic assessment of enhancer–promoter compatibility suggests a multiplicative model tuned by enhancer and promoter class to control gene transcription in the human genome.

Suggested Citation

  • Drew T. Bergman & Thouis R. Jones & Vincent Liu & Judhajeet Ray & Evelyn Jagoda & Layla Siraj & Helen Y. Kang & Joseph Nasser & Michael Kane & Antonio Rios & Tung H. Nguyen & Sharon R. Grossman & Char, 2022. "Compatibility rules of human enhancer and promoter sequences," Nature, Nature, vol. 607(7917), pages 176-184, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:607:y:2022:i:7917:d:10.1038_s41586-022-04877-w
    DOI: 10.1038/s41586-022-04877-w
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-022-04877-w
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1038/s41586-022-04877-w?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Clarice K. Y. Hong & Yawei Wu & Alyssa A. Erickson & Jie Li & Arnold J. Federico & Barak A. Cohen, 2024. "Massively parallel characterization of insulator activity across the genome," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-14, December.
    2. Inês A. M. Barbosa & Rajaraman Gopalakrishnan & Samuele Mercan & Thanos P. Mourikis & Typhaine Martin & Simon Wengert & Caibin Sheng & Fei Ji & Rui Lopes & Judith Knehr & Marc Altorfer & Alicia Lindem, 2023. "Cancer lineage-specific regulation of YAP responsive elements revealed through large-scale functional epigenomic screens," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-15, December.
    3. Dongmei Wang & Haimin Li & Navdeep S. Chandel & Yali Dou & Rui Yi, 2023. "MOF-mediated histone H4 Lysine 16 acetylation governs mitochondrial and ciliary functions by controlling gene promoters," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-17, December.
    4. Vincent Loubiere & Bernardo P. Almeida & Michaela Pagani & Alexander Stark, 2024. "Developmental and housekeeping transcriptional programs display distinct modes of enhancer-enhancer cooperativity in Drosophila," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-11, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:607:y:2022:i:7917:d:10.1038_s41586-022-04877-w. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.