IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nat/nature/v605y2022i7910d10.1038_s41586-022-04716-y.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Phage anti-CBASS and anti-Pycsar nucleases subvert bacterial immunity

Author

Listed:
  • Samuel J. Hobbs

    (Harvard Medical School
    Dana-Farber Cancer Institute)

  • Tanita Wein

    (Weizmann Institute of Science)

  • Allen Lu

    (Harvard Medical School
    Dana-Farber Cancer Institute)

  • Benjamin R. Morehouse

    (Harvard Medical School
    Dana-Farber Cancer Institute)

  • Julia Schnabel

    (Harvard Medical School
    Dana-Farber Cancer Institute)

  • Azita Leavitt

    (Weizmann Institute of Science)

  • Erez Yirmiya

    (Weizmann Institute of Science)

  • Rotem Sorek

    (Weizmann Institute of Science)

  • Philip J. Kranzusch

    (Harvard Medical School
    Dana-Farber Cancer Institute
    Parker Institute for Cancer Immunotherapy at Dana-Farber Cancer Institute)

Abstract

The cyclic oligonucleotide-based antiphage signalling system (CBASS) and the pyrimidine cyclase system for antiphage resistance (Pycsar) are antiphage defence systems in diverse bacteria that use cyclic nucleotide signals to induce cell death and prevent viral propagation1,2. Phages use several strategies to defeat host CRISPR and restriction-modification systems3–10, but no mechanisms are known to evade CBASS and Pycsar immunity. Here we show that phages encode anti-CBASS (Acb) and anti-Pycsar (Apyc) proteins that counteract defence by specifically degrading cyclic nucleotide signals that activate host immunity. Using a biochemical screen of 57 phages in Escherichia coli and Bacillus subtilis, we discover Acb1 from phage T4 and Apyc1 from phage SBSphiJ as founding members of distinct families of immune evasion proteins. Crystal structures of Acb1 in complex with 3′3′-cyclic GMP–AMP define a mechanism of metal-independent hydrolysis 3′ of adenosine bases, enabling broad recognition and degradation of cyclic dinucleotide and trinucleotide CBASS signals. Structures of Apyc1 reveal a metal-dependent cyclic NMP phosphodiesterase that uses relaxed specificity to target Pycsar cyclic pyrimidine mononucleotide signals. We show that Acb1 and Apyc1 block downstream effector activation and protect from CBASS and Pycsar defence in vivo. Active Acb1 and Apyc1 enzymes are conserved in phylogenetically diverse phages, demonstrating that cleavage of host cyclic nucleotide signals is a key strategy of immune evasion in phage biology.

Suggested Citation

  • Samuel J. Hobbs & Tanita Wein & Allen Lu & Benjamin R. Morehouse & Julia Schnabel & Azita Leavitt & Erez Yirmiya & Rotem Sorek & Philip J. Kranzusch, 2022. "Phage anti-CBASS and anti-Pycsar nucleases subvert bacterial immunity," Nature, Nature, vol. 605(7910), pages 522-526, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:605:y:2022:i:7910:d:10.1038_s41586-022-04716-y
    DOI: 10.1038/s41586-022-04716-y
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-022-04716-y
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1038/s41586-022-04716-y?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Chia-Shin Yang & Tzu-Ping Ko & Chao-Jung Chen & Mei-Hui Hou & Yu-Chuan Wang & Yeh Chen, 2023. "Crystal structure and functional implications of cyclic di-pyrimidine-synthesizing cGAS/DncV-like nucleotidyltransferases," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-14, December.
    2. Ning Duan & Emily Hand & Mannuku Pheko & Shikha Sharma & Akintunde Emiola, 2024. "Structure-guided discovery of anti-CRISPR and anti-phage defense proteins," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-10, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:605:y:2022:i:7910:d:10.1038_s41586-022-04716-y. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.