Author
Listed:
- Jennifer F. Hoyal Cuthill
(University of Essex
University of Essex
Tokyo Institute of Technology
University of Cambridge)
- Nicholas Guttenberg
(Tokyo Institute of Technology
Cross Labs, Cross Compass Ltd
GoodAI)
- Graham E. Budd
(Uppsala University)
Abstract
The hypothesis that destructive mass extinctions enable creative evolutionary radiations (creative destruction) is central to classic concepts of macroevolution1,2. However, the relative impacts of extinction and radiation on the co-occurrence of species have not been directly quantitatively compared across the Phanerozoic eon. Here we apply machine learning to generate a spatial embedding (multidimensional ordination) of the temporal co-occurrence structure of the Phanerozoic fossil record, covering 1,273,254 occurrences in the Paleobiology Database for 171,231 embedded species. This facilitates the simultaneous comparison of macroevolutionary disruptions, using measures independent of secular diversity trends. Among the 5% most significant periods of disruption, we identify the ‘big five’ mass extinction events2, seven additional mass extinctions, two combined mass extinction–radiation events and 15 mass radiations. In contrast to narratives that emphasize post-extinction radiations1,3, we find that the proportionally most comparable mass radiations and extinctions (such as the Cambrian explosion and the end-Permian mass extinction) are typically decoupled in time, refuting any direct causal relationship between them. Moreover, in addition to extinctions4, evolutionary radiations themselves cause evolutionary decay (modelled co-occurrence probability and shared fraction of species between times approaching zero), a concept that we describe as destructive creation. A direct test of the time to over-threshold macroevolutionary decay4 (shared fraction of species between two times ≤ 0.1), counted by the decay clock, reveals saw-toothed fluctuations around a Phanerozoic mean of 18.6 million years. As the Quaternary period began at a below-average decay-clock time of 11 million years, modern extinctions further increase life’s decay-clock debt.
Suggested Citation
Jennifer F. Hoyal Cuthill & Nicholas Guttenberg & Graham E. Budd, 2020.
"Impacts of speciation and extinction measured by an evolutionary decay clock,"
Nature, Nature, vol. 588(7839), pages 636-641, December.
Handle:
RePEc:nat:nature:v:588:y:2020:i:7839:d:10.1038_s41586-020-3003-4
DOI: 10.1038/s41586-020-3003-4
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Citations
Citations are extracted by the
CitEc Project, subscribe to its
RSS feed for this item.
Cited by:
- Corentin Jouault & André Nel & Vincent Perrichot & Frédéric Legendre & Fabien L. Condamine, 2022.
"Multiple drivers and lineage-specific insect extinctions during the Permo–Triassic,"
Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-16, December.
- Rebecca B. Cooper & Joseph T. Flannery-Sutherland & Daniele Silvestro, 2024.
"DeepDive: estimating global biodiversity patterns through time using deep learning,"
Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-14, December.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:588:y:2020:i:7839:d:10.1038_s41586-020-3003-4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.