IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nat/nature/v587y2020i7834d10.1038_d41586-020-03189-1.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Five rules for evidence communication

Author

Listed:
  • Michael Blastland
  • Alexandra L. J. Freeman
  • Sander van der Linden
  • Theresa M. Marteau
  • David Spiegelhalter

Abstract

Avoid unwarranted certainty, neat narratives and partisan presentation; strive to inform, not persuade.

Suggested Citation

  • Michael Blastland & Alexandra L. J. Freeman & Sander van der Linden & Theresa M. Marteau & David Spiegelhalter, 2020. "Five rules for evidence communication," Nature, Nature, vol. 587(7834), pages 362-364, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:587:y:2020:i:7834:d:10.1038_d41586-020-03189-1
    DOI: 10.1038/d41586-020-03189-1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-020-03189-1
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1038/d41586-020-03189-1?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Bianca Rochelle Parry & Errolyn Gordon, 2021. "The shadow pandemic: Inequitable gendered impacts of COVID‐19 in South Africa," Gender, Work and Organization, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(2), pages 795-806, March.
    2. Emma Frances Bloomfield & Chris Manktelow, 2021. "Climate communication and storytelling," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 167(3), pages 1-7, August.
    3. Rai, Birendra & Wang, Liang Choon & Pandit, Simone & Handfield, Toby & So, Chiu Ki, 2021. "Awareness of ethical dilemmas enhances public support for the principle of saving more lives in the United States: A survey experiment based on ethical allocation of scarce ventilators," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 282(C).
    4. Eleonora Alabrese & Francesco Capozza & Prashant Garg, 2024. "Politicized Scientists: Credibility Cost of Political Expression on Twitter," CESifo Working Paper Series 11254, CESifo.
    5. Wyrwich, Michael & Steinberg, Philip J. & Noseleit, Florian & de Faria, Pedro, 2022. "Is open innovation imprinted on new ventures? The cooperation-inhibiting legacy of authoritarian regimes," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 51(1).
    6. Marcus Roel & Manuel Staab, 2021. "The benefits of being misinformed," AMSE Working Papers 2108, Aix-Marseille School of Economics, France.
    7. Sylvia Richardson, 2022. "Statistics in times of increasing uncertainty," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 185(4), pages 1471-1496, October.
    8. repec:jdm:journl:v:17:y:2022:i:4:p:849-882 is not listed on IDEAS
    9. Prince, Nick & Maye, Damian & Ilbery, Brian & Kirwan, James, 2022. "‘Real’ regulation and property relations on agricultural estates: Reducing opportunities for new entrants to agriculture," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 114(C).
    10. repec:cup:judgdm:v:17:y:2022:i:4:p:849-882 is not listed on IDEAS
    11. Du, Manqing & Zhang, Tingru & Liu, Jinting & Xu, Zhigang & Liu, Peng, 2022. "Rumors in the air? Exploring public misconceptions about automated vehicles," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 156(C), pages 237-252.
    12. Danopoulos, Evangelos & Aston, John & Shah, Aarushi & Schneider, Claudia, 2024. "Evidence Communication Rules for Policy (ECR-P) critical appraisal tool," SocArXiv shwfu, Center for Open Science.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Communication;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:587:y:2020:i:7834:d:10.1038_d41586-020-03189-1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.