IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nat/nature/v587y2020i7833d10.1038_s41586-020-2842-3.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Equilibrium between nascent and parental MCM proteins protects replicating genomes

Author

Listed:
  • Hana Sedlackova

    (University of Copenhagen)

  • Maj-Britt Rask

    (University of Copenhagen)

  • Rajat Gupta

    (University of Copenhagen)

  • Chunaram Choudhary

    (University of Copenhagen)

  • Kumar Somyajit

    (University of Copenhagen)

  • Jiri Lukas

    (University of Copenhagen)

Abstract

Minichromosome maintenance proteins (MCMs) are DNA-dependent ATPases that bind to replication origins and license them to support a single round of DNA replication. A large excess of MCM2–7 assembles on chromatin in G1 phase as pre-replication complexes (pre-RCs), of which only a fraction become the productive CDC45–MCM–GINS (CMG) helicases that are required for genome duplication1–4. It remains unclear why cells generate this surplus of MCMs, how they manage to sustain it across multiple generations, and why even a mild reduction in the MCM pool compromises the integrity of replicating genomes5,6. Here we show that, for daughter cells to sustain error-free DNA replication, their mother cells build up a nuclear pool of MCMs both by recycling chromatin-bound (parental) MCMs and by synthesizing new (nascent) MCMs. Although all MCMs can form pre-RCs, it is the parental pool that is inherently stable and preferentially matures into CMGs. By contrast, nascent MCM3–7 (but not MCM2) undergo rapid proteolysis in the cytoplasm, and their stabilization and nuclear translocation require interaction with minichromosome-maintenance complex-binding protein (MCMBP), a distant MCM paralogue7,8. By chaperoning nascent MCMs, MCMBP safeguards replicating genomes by increasing chromatin coverage with pre-RCs that do not participate on replication origins but adjust the pace of replisome movement to minimize errors during DNA replication. Consequently, although the paucity of pre-RCs in MCMBP-deficient cells does not alter DNA synthesis overall, it increases the speed and asymmetry of individual replisomes, which leads to DNA damage. The surplus of MCMs therefore increases the robustness of genome duplication by restraining the speed at which eukaryotic cells replicate their DNA. Alterations in physiological fork speed might thus explain why even a minor reduction in MCM levels destabilizes the genome and predisposes to increased incidence of tumour formation.

Suggested Citation

  • Hana Sedlackova & Maj-Britt Rask & Rajat Gupta & Chunaram Choudhary & Kumar Somyajit & Jiri Lukas, 2020. "Equilibrium between nascent and parental MCM proteins protects replicating genomes," Nature, Nature, vol. 587(7833), pages 297-302, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:587:y:2020:i:7833:d:10.1038_s41586-020-2842-3
    DOI: 10.1038/s41586-020-2842-3
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-020-2842-3
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1038/s41586-020-2842-3?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Hana Polasek-Sedlackova & Thomas C. R. Miller & Jana Krejci & Maj-Britt Rask & Jiri Lukas, 2022. "Solving the MCM paradox by visualizing the scaffold of CMG helicase at active replisomes," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-11, December.
    2. Mattheus H. E. Wildschut & Julien Mena & Cyril Dördelmann & Marc Oostrum & Benjamin D. Hale & Jens Settelmeier & Yasmin Festl & Veronika Lysenko & Patrick M. Schürch & Alexander Ring & Yannik Severin , 2023. "Proteogenetic drug response profiling elucidates targetable vulnerabilities of myelofibrosis," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-19, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:587:y:2020:i:7833:d:10.1038_s41586-020-2842-3. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.